User talk:Crookesmoor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive[edit]

Sections before Jan 2016


Ways to improve Final Score (2017 film)[edit]

Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Crookesmoor, thanks for creating Final Score (2017 film)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I looked the film up and couldn't find much information on it. Is it truly notable? If so, please add more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons Talk 17:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to The Glades (Bromley), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 15:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Consensus here (and amongst other places) have been to retain the previous name and you've been told this before so I would kindly ask you stop moving the "Intu" articles and get consensus for them first, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

UTC Oxfordshire[edit]

Thanks for your recent edit to the UTC Oxfordshire article. It's great to get more information like that into short articles like this one. Where did you come across that info? If you could add a reference into the article showing where it comes from, that would be really helpful. Thanks CalzGuy (talk) 10:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Greater Manchester University Technical College[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article The Greater Manchester University Technical College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I believe this is a diploma mill or fake school trading off the name of Manchester University and trying to telescope as many search terms into its name as possible. Its official web address is .co.uk which would not be the case for a bona fide educational establishment which tends to have ac.uk or org.uk depending on whether it is provided by the UK government/local authority via the UK domain name registrar (for the first), or administered by the school itself (for the second). It would be unlikely to be .co.uk. More reasons over at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 3#RM, but I am going to kick this off sooner rather than later before I have done much more homework. That it is next to (but not on the campus of Bolton College is also suspicious. Could be genuine but is doing its best not to seem so. It is formally (not formerly) the "The Greater Manchester Sustainable Engineering University Technical College", according to its lede, which packs one more word (Engineering) into the search engine (and Google indeed finds it as top hit). Barely any credible info there and no references, so deleting per WP:SCHOOL is the most likely thing to do, but this seems to me to border on the fraudulent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Si Trew (talk) 13:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Copa90[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Copa90 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Donnie Park (talk) 22:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Luxborough Tower for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luxborough Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxborough Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 22:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Epping Forest district[edit]

Hi Crookesmoor

I notice that on 31 March you moved Epping Forest District to Epping Forest (district).

While I'm not saying that you were wrong to do so (and please don't feel that you were), I have started a discussion on the article's talk page about whether the "district" in the title should be spelled with a small 'd' and be enclosed within parentheses, or if it should be spelled with a capital 'D' and without parentheses enclosing it.

And I feel that it would be in your best interest to participate in this discussion.

Thanks and regards, Bluebird207 (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Ross Greer (politician) has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg Hello, Crookesmoor. Ross Greer (politician), an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Ross Greer (politician)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 17 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ross Greer (politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2016, Ross Greer became the youngest ever Member of the Scottish Parliament, elected at the age of 21? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ross Greer (politician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ross Greer (politician)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meetings, incentives, conferencing, exhibitions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Event (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sidcup has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Moving Sidcup to Sudcip is rather immature and also disruptive, Please don't do it again otherwise you'll end up blocked. –Davey2010Talk 15:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Davey2010 has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 19:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meridian Crew[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meridian Crew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Launchballer 12:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Copa90[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Copa90 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Absolutely no indication of notability whatsoever. If producing stuff for Instagram made a firm notable, then surely all Instagram users by extension are also notable. Anyone can produce stuff for their own website - I publish music reviews every week - but that doesn't make them notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Launchballer 12:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meridian Crew[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meridian Crew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 18:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Meridian Crew for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meridian Crew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meridian Crew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nordic Nightfury 14:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Crookesmoor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Midlands Engine[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Midlands Engine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 17:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

NCR1[edit]

Your entry for Strood on line 157 is fine (but reference please); I am reverting Rochester Bridge as the link does not belong in the lead on line 4, as there is no further explanation in the article, the lead is only a synopsis. Please resubmit in the right place and add the referenced info to a lot more articles. ClemRutter (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikiproject![edit]

Hello, Crookesmoor! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

2014 National Rail ticket features[edit]

Hello Crookesmoor, hope you are well. Apologies but I have very restricted computer access at the moment because of domestic renovation work (I've logged on at work to send this!). I think something like National Rail ticket redesign might be suitably generic. (Incidentally if I get time, I can substantially expand the article now that we're two years down the line with the actual rollout (i.e. beyond the limited Parkeon trial on Northern). I'll put it on my to-do list. Not sure when I will get my home PC back up and running, so this may be some way off yet.) Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Bromley Common[edit]

On 3 January 2017‎ you placed the {{copyvio}} template onto Bromley Common but didn't add any more detail of the source of the copyvio. So I've removed it. Please fell free to refile with sources. -- WOSlinker (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of London Design and Engineering UTC[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on London Design and Engineering UTC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PUNKMINKIS (TALKYTALK) 15:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)