- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 04:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
what's with your edits to Supreme Court of British Columbia
We're not part of the British Empire; re this and subsequent attempts to add the Royal Coat of Arms, please desist; Canada has a different royal court of arms anyway, and the BCSC has its own, also. Cut it with the neo-imperialism.Skookum1 (talk) 04:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- This is an incorrect (and may I say, disrespectful) statement. All courts in BC use the UK Coat of Arms as the symbols, unlike other courts in Canada. For example, you will see the Coat of Appeal Annual Report prominently display the CoA in its first page. , in the Supreme Court direction  and in the Provincial Court . This matter was long debated ago and it's a settled matter. I am not sure why this debate is being re-opened at this stage.--Cahk (talk) 05:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Now now Skookum1, don't be bitchy. I never did it because I was a neo-imperialist, which I am not and will never be. So, I'm sorry & stfu. And to 117Avenue, sorry for the nonconstructive, was never my intention. Thank you. --Cscott32100 4:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)