User talk:CurtisNaito

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, CurtisNaito, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dismas|(talk) 05:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Hijiri 88 (やや) 00:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom case amendment request[edit]

A case-amendment request in which you were involved has been archived at WT:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 14:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Korean influence on Japanese culture‎‎[edit]

This is unbelievably unacceptable, and exactly the kind of thing that you were blocked for before. The next step is ANI—and given it's a repeat offense, it'll likely be a very long block. Get consensus on the talk page, period, and no games. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 05:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

My point was that you should have just tagged the portion of the article that you are concerned about, not the entire article. When you tagged the article, you didn't even say anything on the talk page to indicate your reasons. Therefore, it's quite unclear which section you want altered. Just tagging the whole article without giving any reason is not particularly useful, especially since the large majority of the article's content is not new and not the subject of any talk page dispute.CurtisNaito (talk) 13:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I didn't put the tags there and you know it, so stop this play-acting. Bottom line: Hands off until you get consensus, and consensus does not mean you and TH1980. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 13:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
The tags were placed there a year ago and refer to disputes that are long since over. If a new neutrality dispute were to appear then you could put the tags back, but even then I still think you should put the tags only over the part of the article that is in dispute. The point of tags is to aid improving the article, but if you just tag it without giving a single reason, it does not serve any useful purpose. You shouldn't put the tags back unless you plan on initiating some dialogue to explain yourself.CurtisNaito (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

topic ban[edit]

Pursuant to consensus at this ANI thread, this is formal notice that you are indefinitely topic banned from articles relating to Japan, broadly construed. Katietalk 13:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)