User talk:CycloneYoris
| This is CycloneYoris's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2025)
[edit]An economic analysis of climate change estimating the median income change by 2050 compared to a baseline scenario
Economic analysis of climate change Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Lead Belly • Comic timing Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:10, 15 September 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lists on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 19:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Akwu (name) for deletion
[edit]These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2025)
[edit]Exterior firefighting at an abandoned convent in Massueville, Canada
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Economic analysis of climate change • Lead Belly Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:09, 22 September 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tet Offensive on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 08:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi CicloneYoris, how are you? Me so and so. Please, I ask you 5 minutes to access and watch this new page I opened now. Please, if you see an y mistake, correct them, my English is ver poor!!!
Thanks a lot for your help. Rei Momo (talk) 08:37, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, Rei Momo. I made a small correction, since everything else appears fine to me. Don't worry, the article is well written in my opinion. Hope you're doing fine, and congrats on your new article. 😉 Take care! CycloneYoris talk! 00:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your important help. See you soon. Rei Momo (talk) 05:55, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Deletion review for Call of the Void
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Call of the Void. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Nire46 (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi, apologies, as I'm new to this process, so help me if this isn't the place for it-- but I think the original page should be kept intact, as it's a separate concept that isn't mentioned on the Suicidal Ideation page, that specifically is noted as NOT being Suicidal Ideation. It's an important concept with a well-known phrase used in many places and culturally important. Naturally, the French page for it is still up. I also believe the original consensus was interpreted incorrectly, as it seemed to be a discussion if it was a suitable fit for redirect, and seemed to migrate topic when the page to which to redirect had been decided.
I'll be opening a deletion review for this. Nire46 (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Coptic language on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 02:31, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2025)
[edit]An Antarctic fur seal biting another one while fighting
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Firefighting • Economic analysis of climate change Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 September 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Imelda misspelled
[edit]I saw that you moved Imelda (2019), saying it was misspelled, but it looked fine to me. What am I missing? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink: The word "Tropical" was written with a capital I at the end, and not with a lowercase L. I also failed to notice it at first tbh. CycloneYoris talk! 01:25, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Oh that is evil! >:( Thank you lol ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurricanehink: Yep. No prob. ;) CycloneYoris talk! 01:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Oh that is evil! >:( Thank you lol ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 October 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Larry Sanger returns with "Nine Theses on Wikipedia"; WMF publishes transparency report
This time "not merely negative".
- In the media: Extraordinary eruption of "EVIL" explained
Wickedpedia wrangles post-truth politics.
- Disinformation report: Emails from a paid editing client
Unexpected news!
- Discussion report: Sourcing, conduct, policy and LLMs: another 1,339 threads analyzed
Fifty hot topics from fourteen noticeboards.
- Community view: The pressing questions of the modern WWW, as seen from the Village Pump
Policy, politics, icons, captchas, and LLMs.
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia a merchant of (non-)doubt for glyphosate?; eight projects awarded Wikimedia Research Fund grants
And other recent publications.
- Opinion: Some disputes aren't worth it
When to walk away.
- Obituary: Michael Q. Schmidt
Rest in peace.
- Traffic report: Death, hear me call your name
Celebrities, deaths and software.
- Comix: A grand spectacle
All invited!
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2025)
[edit]The hierarchy of biological classification's eight major taxonomic ranks. A family contains one or more genera.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Biting • Firefighting Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2025)
[edit]A woman in a crocheted cape
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Genus • Biting Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Painter Giacinto Mondaini
[edit]Hi CycloneYoris, how are you? Me I'm very fine: I restarted to train karate after 22 years stop. It is a wonderful expericence!!!
Please, I ask 3 minutes of your time to access this new page and correct my poor mistakes. Thanks a lot for your great help. See you soon. Rei Momo (talk) 07:02, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hello there, Rei Momo! Glad that you restarted karate after so long, it's never too late to restart something. I apologize for the late reply, but I've been kinda overwhelmed with Wiki stuff and haven't paid much attention to my talk page. I've just reviewed your article and didn't find any errors. Congrats on your new article. See you soon! CycloneYoris talk! 23:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your visit, see you soon!!! Rei Momo (talk) 07:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I regret you rejected my edits. Dana Sue Gray was suspected of killing 3 elderly women and of attempting to kill a fourth woman. However, she was not charged in one of the murder cases. That is the point I was trying to make, i.e. regarding the number of victims she was legally held accountable for (see here). If you agree please restore the edits. If not ... then not.
Thanks. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 20:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2025)
[edit]A sign at an anti-monarchy protest in the United Kingdom
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Cape • Genus Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
The Signpost: 20 October 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Board shuffles, LLM blocks increase, IPs are going away
And the "Global Resource Distribution Committee" emerges.
- Special report: The election that isn't
Two shortlisted WMF Board candidates removed from the ballot.
- Interview: The BoT bump
Who was bumped and why?
- In the media: An incident at WikiConference North America; WMF reports AI-related traffic drop and explains Wikipedia to US conservatives
...while Musk prepares to launch "Grokipedia".
- Traffic report: One click after another
Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.
- Humour: Wikipedia pay rates
Don't get too excited before you read this.
PCR award
[edit]| A barnstar for you! | |
| Congratulations on being the top 4th pending changes reviewer during 25 September—24 October 2025, accepting over 100 changes. :) [source/credit] randomdude121 16:18, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2025)
[edit]The Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory, granting a 99-year lease on the New Territories
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Criticism of monarchy • Cape Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 October 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Happy Birthday!
[edit]| Happy birthday! Hi CycloneYoris! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday!
[edit]
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2025)
[edit] Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: 99-year lease • Criticism of monarchy Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2025)
[edit]Various crop seeds
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Performance • 99-year lease Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
The Signpost: 10 November 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Temporary accounts go live and WMF board member self-suspends
ArbCom elections draw close, and Wikimania '27 in Santiago.
- Community view: Six Wikipedians' thoughts on Grokipedia, and the humanity of it all
It ain't a five course meal, according to one of our interviewees.
- Wikicup report: BeanieFan11, WikiCup victor of 2025, covers the results
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
- In the media: Jimbo's book, an argument about genocide, and a train of shame
Wikipedia's new rival, political controversy in Italy and other Wiki-reports.
- Recent research: Taking stock of the 2024–2025 research grants
$400,000 USD in total funding: what did we get?
- Opinion: With Grokipedia, top-down control of knowledge is new again
Does it shed any light on particular topics that are better suited to LLM-generation than others?
- Obituary: Struway
Rest in peace.
- Traffic report: The documentaried, the disowned, the deceased, Diwali and the Dodgers
You know your man is working hard, he's worth a deuce.
- Comix: Head of steam
'Sblood!
You relisted the AfD asking for whether it should be redirected or merged. As the nominator of the AfD, I personally believe a merge would be unnecessary, as the Development section of Wayward Realms has nearly the exact same information as in the OnceLost Games article, which you can see for yourself if you compare the two pages. It's possible Mika1h simply stated merge out of habit. Perhaps you could just close it as redirect right away and save time. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm:
Done. My apologies for not noticing that a merge was unnecessary. CycloneYoris talk! 09:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2025)
[edit] Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Crop • Performance Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Hi, dearest CycloneYoris, how are yoiu? Me I'm fine!!!
Please, can you help me expanding a little this page? There aren't many news in Italian, and I don't know where to find in English. Thanks a lot for your great help and have a nice week end. Rei Momo (talk) 08:07, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, dear Rei Momo. Sure thing! I'll see if I can find some English sources. Thanks, I hope you have a nice weekend as well. :) CycloneYoris talk! 09:12, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Grazie mille and have a ncie Sunday!!! Rei Momo (talk) 14:39, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
incase i havent already said this to you
[edit]i have happened to open a discussion in which you may very likely be interested in
you can see the details here if you so wish Oreocooke (talk) 04:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Oreocooke: Thanks! I'll let other editors participate in the RfD before weighing in, since I honestly have no opinion at the moment. CycloneYoris talk! 04:50, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Articles for Creation backlog drive
[edit]
Hello CycloneYoris:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2025)
[edit] Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Kidnapping • Crop Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 24 November 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Kefalonia International Airport
[edit]The IP was removing content that had been tagged with Citation Needed tags - why are we restoring them without sources? Removal of unsourced information is explicitly permitted by WP:V. Danners430 tweaks made 09:43, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Danners430: At least they should've explained why they were removing it. Unexplained removal of content isn't helpful regardless if the content is sourced or not. I went ahead and restored the reference that the IP removed for no apparent reason. CycloneYoris talk! 10:06, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- I do agree - I mean, just look at the userboxes on my talk page... but it is explicitly permitted whether we agree or not. I did miss the sole source they removed. Danners430 tweaks made 10:08, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Danners430: No worries. I just restored it a while ago… and I would've gladly accepted the IPs' edits had they provided an edit summary to explain their actions. I have nothing against those who remove unsourced content, as long as they provide an adequate edit summary along with their edits. CycloneYoris talk! 10:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- It's a difficult one - as much as I agree (I despise users that don't use summaries)... unfortunately it's not a requirement, so if we do revert users for no reason other than not explaining their edits, it's us that may be in breach of policy. I do agree it's an annoying set of circumstances, but that's what we as recent changes patrollers (and adjacent) have to live with. Danners430 tweaks made 10:52, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Danners430: No worries. I just restored it a while ago… and I would've gladly accepted the IPs' edits had they provided an edit summary to explain their actions. I have nothing against those who remove unsourced content, as long as they provide an adequate edit summary along with their edits. CycloneYoris talk! 10:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- I do agree - I mean, just look at the userboxes on my talk page... but it is explicitly permitted whether we agree or not. I did miss the sole source they removed. Danners430 tweaks made 10:08, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| A barnstar for you! | |
| Thank you for being part of the fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia, and being one of the top five most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Your hard work is very much appreciated, please keep it up. – DreamRimmer ■ 14:14, 26 November 2025 (UTC) |
Help
[edit]Dear @CycloneYoris please answer me
I hope my follow-ups won’t cause any issues for my account. I published a draft that hasn’t been reviewed yet, and it was edited by your bot. I wanted to kindly ask you to check it, and if it’s approved, please proceed with transferring it Draft:Ahmadreza Asgari He is a player of the Iranian Lalook (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Lane kiffin
[edit]Please fix the false revision to lane Kiffen page he is still the HC of Ole Miss, idk why this keeps being changed but its worrying that the reviews keep getting accepted befor anything is confirmed ~2025-36592-16 (talk) 06:59, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2025)
[edit] Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Emergency management • Kidnapping Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 December 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
The Signpost: 1 December 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Election cycles come and go, and Wikimedia Foundation achieves record revenue in 2024–2025!
Admin and ArbCom elections upcoming, BoT elects two new members, task force advises to close Wikinews and keep Wikispore, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
- In the media: Wales walk-off, antisemitism, supernatural powers, feminism turmoil, saints, and sex
Plus mammoth mummy sex-change operation completed!
- Recent research: At least 80 million inconsistent facts on Wikipedia – can AI help find them?
And other recent publications about contradictions and retractions.
- Disinformation report: Epstein email exchanges planned strategy, edits and reported progress
At work on Wikipedia whitewashing. How much should they be paid?
- Traffic report: It's a family affair
Even in these times there is something to be thankful for!
- Book review: The Seven Rules of Trust
Jimmy Wales and Dan Gardner write a book inspired by Wikipedia. What's in it?
- From the archives: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein ..."
The twists and turns of Epstein’s portrayal on Wikipedia.
- Humour: An interview with Wikipe-tan
A conversation about being the mascot of Wikipedia.
- Opinion: AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articles
Using ChatGPT to fact-check a month's worth of Today's featured articles.
- Serendipity: Highlights from the itWikiCon 2025
A recap of the latest convention of the Italian Wiki-community, held in Catania from 7–9 November.
- Comix: Madness
It could happen to anyone.
Hi I am Barkeep49. I recently saw that you choose to relist Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whittaker family (2nd nomination) with the comment Delete or keep?
. This comment is both obvious and also incomplete to the point of being unsatisfactory by its failure to address the serious claims of BLP issues that participants in that discussion raised. Given this concern, I reviewed your relists just from today. Many of them seem to be appropriate outcomes but I do have some questions, thoughts, or concerns about several of them:
- I share the concern about the lack of a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jailbreak (Roblox) and think that the comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Smithers is like the Whittaker family particularly unhelpful, though at least Smithers doesn't have the BLP issues of Whittaker.
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VA-38 (U.S. Navy) seems like a particularly aggressive close. I tend to be more willing than most closers to close before a relist, and I'm not sure I'd have been willing to close that as a redirect.
- Conversely, I would be quite willing to close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/התקווה and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/טאהש and in fact will be doing so shortly after leaving this message. There is no serious opposition to removing this articles and so it is only a matter of weighing whether there a consensus for deleting or redirecting. Given this, it is the kind of discussion probably best closed by an admin to avoid cognitive biases in favor of an outcome you could implement (see also WP:RELISTBIAS).
- I almost lumped Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/강수연 in with the two above, but I actually think this one could be reasonably relisted if there were a policy based reason given, but I also think most closers would find it ripe for closure rather than relisting. In other words this is barely within closer discretion to relist, but would need a policy based reason to do so and in particular why the policy does not weight the discussion towards an outcome.
- Speaking of policy based reasons, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vranyo requires
a short explanation either within the {{relist}} template, or in addition to it, on why they did not consider the current state of the discussion sufficient to determine a closure result
because third relists should generally not happen per WP:RELIST.Final relist. Keep or delete?
does not satisfy that requirement.
I know there is a lot here. Please don't hesitate to ask questions if you have them. Thanks and best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:50, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- I see that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragan Obradović was closed with the similarly aggressive close as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VA-38 (U.S. Navy) at the same time as I was leaving the above comment. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:13, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Barkeep49: I'm not sure what you find aggressive about it? These AfDs are all unopposed, meaning nobody has proposed anything different from what the nominator is proposing. Perhaps I could've mentioned this in my closing rationales, but I thought it would've been unnecessary since the lack of opposition would be quite obvious to anyone. What could possibly be the purpose of relisting an unopposed nomination? I'm frankly not sure what you're so concerned about. I'm not closing any AfD where consensus is unclear or disputed, and I'm usually always careful before relisting any discussion as well (even if you consider that I've done a poor job with my most recent relisting comments). CycloneYoris talk! 04:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your question. Two people is a small number to achieve a consensus at AfD. WP:SOFTDELETE certainly allows for AfDs to be closed with one or two participants in limited circumstances. But crucially that kind of consensus is very weak and can be "undone" by any requesting editor. There isn't really any such thing as a "soft redirect". Instead you have found a normal consensus which can only be undone by you changing the close or by a consensus at DRV. It is aggressive. Were it not for the other concerns, which I appreciate you taking on board, I wouldn't have necessarily commented about it, but since it came up in my review I did want to note it. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Barkeep49: I'm not sure what you find aggressive about it? These AfDs are all unopposed, meaning nobody has proposed anything different from what the nominator is proposing. Perhaps I could've mentioned this in my closing rationales, but I thought it would've been unnecessary since the lack of opposition would be quite obvious to anyone. What could possibly be the purpose of relisting an unopposed nomination? I'm frankly not sure what you're so concerned about. I'm not closing any AfD where consensus is unclear or disputed, and I'm usually always careful before relisting any discussion as well (even if you consider that I've done a poor job with my most recent relisting comments). CycloneYoris talk! 04:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
RfD close
[edit]Sorry about bumping into you there, my bad for not refreshing the page before closing. A relist would've been fine too, it's just that we'd had the whole spate of similar redirects recently all of which closed as delete with the same arguments so in this case I figured the I'd close it. Rusalkii (talk) 23:28, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Rusalkii: No worries. I guess you made the right call, since most participants had voted to delete the redirect, and consensus would've remained the same regardless of the relist, in my opinion. CycloneYoris talk! 00:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2025)
[edit] Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Computer algebra system • Emergency management Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
A barnstar for you!
[edit]| The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I'm always surprised when i see your name on Top Pending Changes Reviewer list, Tireless Contributor. Destinyokhiria 💬 21:58, 11 December 2025 (UTC) |
- @Destinyokhiria: Thank you! :) CycloneYoris talk! 22:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)