User talk:DC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Octagon delete.svg
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
DC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · edit filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "CassidyQ". The reason given for CassidyQ's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Decline reason:

This account has been blocked directly. Use {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} to request an unblock.  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 09:59, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding suspicions that your account has been compromised. The thread is User:DC - compromised account?. Thank you. —Dylan620 (tcr) 06:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Too right - the worst sort of vandal who reverts randomly and has the audacity to warn others about it when they are nothing but a wrecker themselves. Stay away whoever you are! —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

US National Archives collaboration[edit]

United States National Archives WikiProject
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.

There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Media24logo.png[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Media24logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal[edit]

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 1058 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Correct sockpuppets[edit]

Howdy, would someone correct the sockpuppets listed on my user page? I'm actually a sockpuppet of New England/Sasha Callahan et al. While I am behind CassidyQ and Justice America, I have no affiliation with MyKungFu. Cheers! DC 20:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DC (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)

Request reason:

i promise to be good.

Decline reason:

Concur with Mr. Watson's analysis below; a more comprehensive request is necessary here. Since there has been no response from you for a week, I'm closing this request. Kuru (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I am generally disposed to be receptive to requests for unblock from editors who have been disruptive in the past, but after a significant time come back and say they will do better. People do change, especially young people, who can grow out of childish ways very dramatically in a few years. However, I think that we need a bit more than "i promise to be good". There is a huge number of accounts that are either known or strongly suspected to be your sockpuppets, those accounts having been blocked at various times from 2006 to 2012 (counting only the ones I have checked: there may be others earlier or later or both.) Can you give us a bit more information about (a) what you think was wrong with your editing in the past, and (b) how it will be different from now on? Also, if you can state clearly what account you last edited from, that will help. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)