User talk:DD2K

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2
Archive 3 Archive 4
Archive 5 Archive 6- The Beginning

Thanks for calling me Grant:)[edit]

Its been a long time since anyone here did. You may be right. I have been feeling really hurt (I must be more of a softie than I thought) about the topic wide ban. It feels to me like a sort of editing castration. U.S. politics is my primary interest. However, maybe it'll work out to be a good thing as I will be forced to expand my interests. I will definitely stop the kind of editing you noticed. Best wishes, Nocturnalnow (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

  • @Nocturnalnow: That's a good way to look at things, for sure. If I may offer some unsolicited advice, you can go over to recent changes and revert vandalism. That may peak your interest. I am not sure if your topic ban includes reverting obvious vandalism or not, so best to either stay clear of those articles or ask if you are allowed to revert obvious vandalism on those articles. Another thing I might do is look for articles from my local community and, if we don't already have one, write articles about my local community. I hope you take it easy and find some enjoyment in one of those things, or something else that you might be interested in. Good luck and take care! Dave Dial (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
ok...feels like good suggestions. Nocturnalnow (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

RE: AE sanctions[edit]

Hi,

Just wondering about the AE sanctions on United States pro-life movement. I can't seem to find any source for that being the case - am I looking in the wrong spot? Thanks.--immewnity 07:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA[edit]

Thank-you-word-cloud.jpg Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

About trolling[edit]

Hi, thanks for pointing out a pattern in the edits from the troll IP. I hadn't seen that pattern, since there are also what look like overriding language problems such as possibly confounding exaggeration with diversification. Certainly, this person shouldn't be trying to edit the English wikipedia, but not all of their edits are incompetent, so it seemed worth a try to explain that which it seemed unlikely that they could comprehend. Perhaps it would be on behalf of whoever has the task of educating them in RL. Onward and upward, or something, but thanks. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)