http://www.thenewamerican.com/freedomindex/ DD2k I was not spamming the pages I was adding relevant information that is not available on any other website government or private. I don't think you took the time to really explore the pages within our voter index area. Every sitting senator or representative has an individual page with how they cast their vote. Example On Passage of the Bill S. 815: A bill to prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Vote Date: November 7, 2013 http://www.thenewamerican.com/freedomindex/profile.php?id=S001141 Jefferson Sessions page. You can go here and see how he voted on 70+ key bills. You my not agree on how we rate the vote but what you should see is the information is relevant to his user page on Wikipedia. I added a citation that wasn't in anyway malicious to the pages I edited.
Each bill on the voter index page on The New American is linked to the bill. The information provided on these pages carry weight and add to the [BLP]. This is how they voted on a specific bill. If the person viewing the page wants to understand the bill all thy need to do is click the bill name that is linked and they view the bill. This is factual information. The above bill in my example is linked to http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00232
I looked up what Americus55 (talk): said Rv - no, this is an non-notable site and has no weight on this BLP
This is a notable website and I disagree with this statement and the information provided is backed up by reliable sources validating the edited I added were reliable sources.
DD2K Please provide me with a link that I can go view all this verified information on every standing senator and representative in one source.
Weight is defined- Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.
I am asking you review the content within the freedom index and let me know if you feel your still correct and say I am spamming.
- The problem is that there are not many members of Congress that care how The New American/John Birch Society rate their votes. And reliable sources do not report these ratings. So it's not up to Wikipedia to be a place for free advertising. That's ass backwards. First the group/person must be notable, then it gets added to Wikipedia. So while you and some others may think these ratings are important, most do not. Even if there is a spike in prominence and more people start caring what the John Birch Society believes/rates, that news would belong in the John Birch Society page, not placed in the articles of every freaking member of Congress. So no, I am not changing my mind on this mass spamming. You are welcome to to this to one of the other boards and ask for other opinions, but I doubt very much there would be any kind of consensus to add these ratings to Congress member articles.
- Also, start new threads at the bottom of pages. That is the correct manner to add threads. Thanks. Dave Dial (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Justin Bieber RfC
If you have time and the desire to re-engage in the debate over legal issues and polls at the Justin Bieber article ....pls comment at Talk:Justin Bieber#RfC: Behaviour and legal issues Thank you for your time. -- Moxy (talk) 04:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I update the reference
My update for Yee's Voting on SCA-5 could be found on http://legiscan.com/CA/rollcall/SCA5/id/313934
- I answered on your Talk page. Do not keep adding new sections to Talk pages. Thread your discussion by using (::)colons. Thanks. Dave Dial (talk) 17:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Following on from the discussion, CFredkin is now claiming that because the sources he provided on Mark Begich's page were not reliable, completely different sources on Michael Grimm's page are now also "not reliable", despite the source in question being a named journalist and political director. There is a discussion going on at the talk page and your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Tiller54 (talk) 00:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)