User talk:Dalit101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dalit101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dalitstan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • has since begun the catch the imagination of many Dalit people. <ref name="Dalit Freedom Movement">{{cite book | author=Revd Dr Keith Hebden | title="Dalit Theology and Christian Anarchism" | url=http:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Final warning for replacing redirect without consensus[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Octagon-warning.svg

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Help[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dalit101 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

When I'm editing articles, it takes time to post links and sources. If you're going to ban me before I can even add sources, what's the point? Are you a DALIT? Do you LIVE in the situation we do? If not, don't act like no holy cow. I'm going to personal see to it that you have your moderator rights revoked. Totally unacceptable behaviour!

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not show an understanding of the reasons for your block and does not indicate that unblocking you will be beneficial to the goal of improving the encyclopedia. Kinu t/c 02:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I would advise getting the sources ready before you post. Also, in reference to your edit summary containing "Dalitstan is coming and we have a right to tell the world" - maybe it is, and maybe you think you do. But you have no right to use Wikipedia to tell the world. This is an encyclopaedia, not a bulletin board or social media, or a news site. Finally, the term is 'administrator' (or 'sysop' sometimes) here, not 'moderator'. If you calm down and stop threatening, you will get further. Jamie is reasonable, like most of the admins here, but none of us react well to threats. If you get it done quickly, you can alter your request. Peridon (talk) 22:12, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mahagujarat for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahagujarat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahagujarat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 05:20, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dalit101, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 13:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)