User talk:DanTD/Archive. February 2009
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
I noticed that you are part of Category:Wikipedians against notability.
I would like to invite you to join the Article Rescue Squadron. Although Rescue Squadron members do not share any official position on notability, and are simply focused on rescuing articles for deletion, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.
Caveat: I am writing this as an individual, not as a representative of Article Rescue Squadron. Ikip (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I notice that this category is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to (are members of) it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you, the creator of the category, in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:National Register of Historic Places in Huntington (town), New York]] to articles/categories that belong in it.
I have also blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.
If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.
--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Interstate 10 in Florida. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --75.47.147.2 (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions[1] made on February 10 2009 to Interstate 10 in Florida
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Apparently an anonymous IP is shredding the exit list here, and has dragged me into an edit war - no one can drag you into an edit war.
William M. Connolley (talk) 22:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Oops, need to caution you re PA too: STOP SCREWING UP THIS GODDAMN EXIT LIST! isn't acceptable; nor will silly word-games like To the user complaining, anybody could have your IP, so technically this isn't a personal attack. do you any good William M. Connolley (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Keep up the good work
Don't let the bastards grind you down -Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
New Message
{{tb|Addshore}] ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 12:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 12:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)