User talk:Danlev: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Arnold Murray Article)
(hey: new section)
Line 263: Line 263:
   
 
:Personally, I think that is stated sufficiently by the company entry in the infobox, which I previously changed and added the same reference to. I have changed the other instance in that page. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 
:Personally, I think that is stated sufficiently by the company entry in the infobox, which I previously changed and added the same reference to. I have changed the other instance in that page. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
== hey ==
  +
  +
thanks remind me to never hire you

Revision as of 06:25, 9 January 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Danlev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

RE: Chris Crocker

Just because YOU don't know him doesn't mean he's (a.) extraneous... or (b.) insignificant. There are thousands of articles about people who are completely irrelevant that manage to remain. It's NOT all about you, honey.--The Knowledge 07:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Userpage/talk page

Hi. Please remember to place warnings and other messages on the talk page of the editors, and not on the front of their user pages, as you did to TheKnowledge1814 (talk · contribs). Orane (talk) 04:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Radio SNHU logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Radio SNHU logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi!

Berlin, eh? How much snow did you get? About a foot here, though it's still snowing. And a PHP programmer - cool :) How's your wiki-editing going? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

There's a WebDev major!? In my day there was only math :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Radio SNHU logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Radio SNHU logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Shot at love

I noticed that but somehow I forgot to revert it. I just went and removed the two names from the table, Episode 10 hasn't aired yet. Thanks. ― LADY GALAXY ★彡 Refill/lol 00:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Danlev. You have new messages at Quadell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Redirect of RIT Model Railroad Club

Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on RIT Model Railroad Club, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because RIT Model Railroad Club is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting RIT Model Railroad Club, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion requests of images under CSD#G1

Hello, please review the category WP:CSD#G1, it does not apply to images. Please either use one of the image categories or Template:db-reason. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 23:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Ohhh, alright, thanks. I didn't realize that. --Dan LeveilleTALK 23:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry dude, could i have a chance to link it back to the website and do this, ive never done this before so i need to get to grips. Im referencing all quotes and stuff :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darwoodster (talkcontribs) 20:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Ill rephrase it, deleting all text now and replacing at a later date. I was given permission by the owner to use all images on Wikipedia, is that ok? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darwoodster (talkcontribs) 20:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

This may sound strange but does make sense. I wrote (or started) this article becuase i feel that my Dad's company should be on wikipedia, not for sales or anything, im not putting up prices or times or anything. So, with the pictures, he gave me permission to use any from the website to put on my article. What license do i put them under? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darwoodster (talkcontribs) 20:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Splashypants

Hey, you changed something, now come help edit entire page for splashypants? I did all the linky grunt work, now need it to not look like crap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sloggerbum (talkcontribs)

Yay!

Danlev is the best. He helped me with splashypants. And I put a blurb on the Greenpeace site like you suggested; we'll see how long that lasts before a hippy takes it down ;D. Thanks for sp card, and have a wonderful Christmas! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sloggerbum (talkcontribs) 22:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Park Point at RIT logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Park Point at RIT logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Rochester Institute of Technology and related projects

I see that RIT has only one article. Most major universities have at least three articles, a main article, a list of notable alumni, and maybe major buildings or list of colleges or something. Since you're pretty much one of the only people updating RIT stuff, are you interested in taking on those articles? - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 08:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Goatse.cx

Whoops. It did indeed look like vandalism (unfortunately, after a while I think one starts to assume that nearly all edits to such pages are vandalism, particularly as new information about the subject seems unlikely to arise.) Instead, it appears that I have now learned yet another piece of information that I can't really see ever coming up in conversation. ;) Thanks for correcting my mistake. Cheers. Dina (talk) 22:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Liga de Fútbol Profesional Boliviano

My bad, but still removed the champions list from the La Paz championships as they weren't considered a national championship and thus should not be included on a national champions list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jso 1985 (talkcontribs) 22:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:DeviantART shop.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DeviantART shop.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Friendly tips for deviantART GA

I'm a Wikipedian and a deviant as well (same username, both sites). I've written some GAs and an FA and I watch the process - who gets passed and who gets failed and what for. I saw you nominated dA for GA status, and I wanted to make sure your nom didn't make a quick fail - it might with some of these issues unresolved.

  • You have a {{fact tags}} in the article. That's almost an immediate quick fail. Find citations for them (like quickly, too).
  • External links in the prose of the article are also frowned upon. You can add them at the bottom in an external link section, or just take them out.
  • You have a "borked" citation (#24).
  • The controversy over Scott Jarkoff is confusing. I've been a deviant for over a year and can't really see the importance of Jarkoff's issue. If it really is important, that needs to be clear. You might even want to consider condensing the paragraphs about Jark and Angela Sotira to make it simpler.

I'm rooting for you because I like dA. It may seem like stupid stuff, but the GA process can be rigorous if you get a reviewer who is a hardass for detail. For my recent FA, I spent 4 hours one morning re-doing all my citations for an article. Let me know if you have questions. Best of luck! --Moni3 (talk) 06:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Changes for RIT

Thanks for the tips regarding the RIT page and sorry for the multiple entries. The link to the external page wasnt mine, but was from a prior entry. When I found it, the text was incomplete, obscuring some the later text. I tried not to modify it from its orignal intent, I hope I was sucessfull in this regard. The reason for the multiple entries is because during preview I can see only see the section being edited and not the links list below. It wasnt until I saved the page that I could see the whole thing and realized that I made a mistake. Do you know anyway around this (ie how to view the whole page during preview)? Thanks for you help... Dspark76 (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Gaycom logo 151x49.gif

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Image:Gaycom logo 151x49.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Gaycom logo 151x49.gif|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan LeveilleTALK 03:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Multiple copies of this image were uploaded. To justify the fair-use of this copyrighted logo, please complete the article, then reupload the image, add it to the article, and be sure to tag it with the appropriate fair use disclaimer. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 03:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
That explains it some, once you create a suitable article that justifies the fair use of Image:Gay.com logo.gif, go ahead and reupload it. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 03:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Alina

Re: Hello. Could you delete Alina Smith so I can move Alina there? The article was duplicated. I'm guess I didn't put the right CSD tag on it. Which tag would be correct for this issue. Could you delete the page and reply on my talk page. Thanks so much


What I was trying to do was to make Alina Smith redirect to Alina. Is that possible? I didn't know how to do that. I don't know much about tags and stuff. If you can make it do that, that would be awesome.

David —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.243.194 (talk) 11:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, you're the boss. I was just trying to make an article about my fav artist since I looked her up and there wasn't one. I don't know about this technical stuff, so whatever is cool with you guys —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.243.194 (talk) 11:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Alina Smith

Looks like some cut and paste action went on there. Anthony Appleyard is pretty much the only admin left with the patience to handle those. If I don't manage to get it fixed in the next couple of hours, you should ask him. east.718 at 11:40, December 30, 2007

OK, I think I got it done. It required six pagemoves and a bunch of deletions, but all should be well now. east.718 at 11:49, December 30, 2007

Cool Thanks a lot! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.243.194 (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Re: Great Job

Just wanted to say great job on creating all the airport articles. Nice work! --Dan LeveilleTALK 16:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! just getting a toe hold started on all the Oregon airports to make it easier for any interested parties to pitch in on what they know. --Trashbag (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Dem Bonez

Just letting you know that fictional characters are not covered by A7- the reasoning for this is that it is harder to quickly gauge the notability of fictional characters than it is with real people- there are more shades of grey. As such, I have replaced your speedy tag with a prod. All the best, J Milburn (talk) 18:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Anna-Svidersky-2.jpg

Hi, could you please elaborate on why you tagged this image for deletion under WP:CSD#I9? ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Some Notes

I would like to register a complaint against you. The word "Faggotry" seem to sum up my problems with you succinctly. You really should fuck your father in your bedroom, not on your lawn. 71.250.37.239 (talk) 07:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I've reported you to administrators. :) --Dan LeveilleTALK 07:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

List of high schools in Florida

I'm not going to edit war with you (IOW, I'll leave your edit, although it's likely to be removed by others who watch the page), but it's highly unlikely that redlinks on that list will encourage anyone to write an article on the school. Almost all of the high school articles I've seen have been written by someone who attends or attended the school, which rather limits the potential for a redlink on a list to do much in this case. Sometimes redlinks are useful for spurring creation of new articles, but I doubt it in this case. This list (and I would imagine others like it) tend to become link farms for external links to school websites, which necessitates a periodic cleanup. It's much easier to add an external link than to write even a stub article. (Addendum — Please take a look at the talk page for the article, on which it was generally agreed that redlinks should not appear on the list.) Horologium (talk) 03:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:DeviantART Fella.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:DeviantART Fella.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. wL<speak·check> 21:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced

I used to tag towards the top, then I had a change of heart after agreeing with User:Shanes/Why tags are evil. See the conversation I had on this last month also at User_talk:Longhair/Archive18#Tags and User_talk:Unschool#Tag_placement. Cheers. -- Longhair\talk 08:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability

Dont you dare say im not notable. I have lawyers you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonedead (talkcontribs) 11:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Briefs picture

No worries. I didn't much care for that one either, and the original version of the one I uploaded had trademark issues but was a pretty decent one to begin with, so it seemed like the best solution. Cheers! ペコペコ (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Arnold Murray Article

Your admin protected the wrong page. The article locked is the gutted version which started on 10 December 2007. There is no dispute now, the user doing this is happy to see the article gutted. He also gutted the article on roy gillaspie down to one line. That is why wikipedia has trouble raising money, too many personal agendas and incidents like this.Tss8071 (talk) 13:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

An admin, Camaron1, locked the wrong article. The article s/he locked is the gutted one which started on 10 December 2007.
S/he says it is in dispute, there is no dispute now, that user is happy to see the gutted version on wikipedia and the 'roy gillaspie' article was gutted down to one line because it relates to 'arnold murray'.
You say you did not look into it much, I know. Incidents like these make it hard for wikipedia to be considered ligitimate.
I am going walking. Bye.Tss8071 (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes he did protect the wrong article. That is the gutted version from 10 December 2007, previous to that, the article was unchanged for a long time.
An anon user participating in this also gutted the 'roy gillaspie' article to one line because it refers to arnold murray. I reverted those changes but is the one line article also the correct article to be there?
There is a dispute tag on the arnold murray article. Maybe you can tell me exactly what the dispute is? The user doing this is happy to see the gutted version on wikipedia.
He is gone. You can remove the dispute tag now.Tss8071 (talk) 13:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Everyone has been left a message but it takes two people to have a dispute and he is gone. The admin(s) locked the gutted article. Maybe you can explain to me how one person can have a dispute with himself.
Let me repeat that. The users doing this, gutting the article since 10 December 2007, are gone.
Based on what the admins have done so far with this, I have little confidence they will do much more, let alone the right thing.
Your statement about this making wikipedia legitimate made me laugh. Mindless locking of articles is considered good work?
Also, your statement about how much money they raised made me laugh. I contract and work in many companies and have heard more often then not that there are too many personal agendas on wikipedia and that is what makes it hard to be recognized as legitimate.
$1.5 million? Maybe if admins did better work, that number could have been double or more. Sounds like you are happy with average performance and label it as excellent work.Tss8071 (talk) 14:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
So, the resolution is, from cameron1, the gutted article will unprotect in five days and if it is reverted back to the original, then the user doing the reverting could be banned.
Got it now why wikipedia has trouble being considered legiitimate? And locking an article on the main apge is not simply locking whatever version is there, it is the version that stays based on cameron1's comments.Tss8071 (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Cameron1 has lifted the lock on the article and the current, gutted, version stays. That is the result of the dispute process. Whichever article version is locked on the main page means everything. What cameron1 has done is legitamize vandalism and wiped out the work of many people for over a year.Tss8071 (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, the article has undergone several revisions by the same users. First they gutted it and cluebot caught the vandalism and reverted it. So, now they are slicing it up a little at a time, removing all negative content.
Reverting it back would constitute an edit war. So, over one year's work by many people, wiped out in minutes.Tss8071 (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I am not sure why you are editing it also. Parts of the article do not even make sense but are just disjointed sentences. Their goal is to remove all negative content and they realized that removing too much at one time alerts cluebot, so, they are removing a piece at a time. They will cut more pieces out over a period of this week. When I say they, they could very well be one person with multiple accounts. One year of work down the toilet through vandalism and a blatent disregard for the wiki process and for what the admin, cameron1, said.Tss8071 (talk) 11:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

The templates are appropriate, background information is missing and was cut out of the article. DO NOT REMOVE tags without a discussion of it.65.87.185.73 (talk) 13:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Your question was why not restore the information, because the same users delete it and that constitues an edit war. The original version of the article was restored after the vandalism, per cameron1's instructions, and within 12 hours, the same users went back and gutted the information out. Cluebot caught it and reverted the changes. It seems they are gutting a little at a time so as not to alert cluebot. Since an edit war is a violation of wiki policies, the only other option is to mark the article with the wiki tags.65.87.185.73 (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, cameron1 has already been left a message. You said to simply add the information back in, why? Those users cut it out again. The wiki process was followed, the decision was made, with the help of cameron1, and the users went back and re-deleted everything.
I agree it would be nice to discuss or build the article but all that has been done and all that has been undone within a matter of 1 minute.
The article started fairly small, a long time ago, and was edited by many people to something reasonable. Controversial stuff removed. This one user will have none of that though and will delete anything added not to his liking.
Maybe at some point in the future, the work will be re-done after users like that disappear but after the article is redone, I suppose another user like him will gut the article again.65.87.185.73 (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I put the article back, the one Cameron1 said to put back, and verified the license with 'Angel', Benton Countty Clerk's Office, 479-271-1013.

However, I am sure that will not stop them from deleting the information again.Tss8071 (talk) 15:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Why was the ministerial license removed?Tss8071 (talk) 19:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, it was a nice try but some users are just not going to let any negative information in. The claim was the ministerial license was a fabrication. I got the license, uploaded it, sourced it, and they removed it anyway. Also, some of the paragraphs are disjointed sentences now, so, it would be difficult to restore the article piecemeal. The version earlier today was a good version and if people want to rewrite, etc. that is fine, but this other user is slicing and dicing anything negative. Thanks anyway thoughTss8071 (talk) 06:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Kate Gleason - RIT alumna?

You added the Rochester Institute of Technology alumni tag to the Kate Gleason article. Although she left a sizeable portion of her estate to RIT, I can find no evidence that she actually attended RIT or its predecessor Mechanics Institute. It would help if you could add a verifiable source reference for this. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 15:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

About this edit...

Please don't do that -- it only encourages them. See WP:DENY. Just warn them, watch them, but don't goad them, ok? Thanks! Gscshoyru (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

High school names

Hi Dan, I gather that on further thought the proposed standard of high school name (city, state) was found to be unnecessary for schools which have the same name as the city and which are the only ones with that name in the state. I have therefore gone ahead and changed back Laconia, Gorham, Franklin, Exeter, Concord, and Belmont high schools. I agree with you and the others that (city, state) should be kept when the high school name is not the same as the town's, so places like Campbell and Trinity high schools should not have their names changed. Anyway, keep up the good work on the New Hampshire edits! --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Rochester Wikipedia groups

Hi Dan. User:Kingturtle tells me he recently moved to Rochester and would like to know if there are any Rochester groups online or offline for Wikipedia. I don't know of any ... do you? Truthanado (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

You're not alone Dan. My wife and kids are convinced I am addicted to Wikipedia. And, by the way, I am both a Rochester Wikipedian and an RIT alumnus (from too many years ago to count) so I joined your new cat (which, by the way I had accidentally joined when you wikilinked it on my talk page; I nowiki'ed that tag and added the tag to my user page).While editing, I have occasionally "bumped into" Wikipedians from Rochester. Maybe we can see how many of us there are. Go Tigers. Truthanado (talk) 02:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

deviantART Move

Hey, I hope you don't mind, I added the standardized template to the Requested move back to deviantART. I didn't realize a requested move case, so I thought it should be added. If you'd rather it didn't be there, feel free to undo my edit. Thanks. --Dan LeveilleTALK 06:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. GreenReaper (talk) 06:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, do you think that (official typeset "deviantART") should be (official typeset and incorporated as "deviantART"). Because this is officially how they are incorporated. They use this on their legal documents and contracts. The title appears exactly as deviantART, Inc. --Dan LeveilleTALK 04:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Personally, I think that is stated sufficiently by the company entry in the infobox, which I previously changed and added the same reference to. I have changed the other instance in that page. GreenReaper (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

hey

thanks remind me to never hire you