User talk:Darkwarriorblake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Images of the other killers[edit]

Since there is one image of Stu Macher and Billy Loomis the original Ghostface killers, could you add in three more images of the other Ghostface killers please?

1. [Loomis] and [Altieri], the second Ghostface killers.

2. [Bridger], the third and final Ghostface killer.

3. [Roberts] and [Walker], the fourth and new Ghostface killers. 31.48.57.250 (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Darkwarriorblake. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

South Park: The Fractured but Whole[edit]


Season's Greetings![edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello Darkwarriorblake, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018.
Happy editing,
TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas Darkwarriorblake![edit]

Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here.★Trekker (talk) 23:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays[edit]

Snowflake macro (Unsplash).jpg Happy Holidays
From Stave one of Dickens A Christmas Carol

Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail.

So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD|Talk 00:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Heddwch ac ewyllys da[edit]

  Claude Monet - The Magpie - Google Art Project.jpg Compliments of the season
Wishing you all the best for 2018 — good health, sufficient wealth, peace and contentment 
 Cheers! ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones The Welsh Buzzard ‑ ‑ 18:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings[edit]

The Great White North.jpg

...to you and yours, from Canada's Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas![edit]

Happy New Year, Darkwarriorblake![edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Vaas Montenegro listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vaas Montenegro. Since you had some involvement with the Vaas Montenegro redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

South Park: The Fractured But Whole[edit]

Just a quick question, but why remove the category if you agree?24.47.204.97 (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anbe Sivam/archive1[edit]

I have hopefully resolved your comments, Darkwarriorblake. Let me know if there's anything. Thanks. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── The article has been promoted to FA. My first solo FA. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations[edit]

It's been a long journey, but we made it out of that pipe. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Happy Pongal, Makar Sankranti, Lohri and Bihu to you![edit]

May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending! Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Deep Space Homer[edit]

Hello,

Congratulations of reaching FA status for the Shawshank Redemption. Andy Dufresne(Your article) has finally arrived in Mexico(Featured Article).

I currently have Deep Space Homer at FAC. This will be my first FAC and I am wondering if you could help me out in leaving comments and looking it over. I totally understand if you're busy, but do you have any interest in looking over it? I'd be happy to return the favor if you have any outstanding nominations yourself. If you have any GAN's you need to get cleared, ill be more than happy to review them. Thank you so much for your contributions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

@Darkwarriorblake: I have resolved 90% of your issues and left a comment on one. AmericanAir88 (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@Darkwarriorblake: All issues have been solved. Thank you!

Your GA nomination of South Park: The Fractured but Whole[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article South Park: The Fractured but Whole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 16:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South Park: The Fractured but Whole[edit]

The article South Park: The Fractured but Whole you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South Park: The Fractured but Whole for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South Park: The Fractured but Whole[edit]

The article South Park: The Fractured but Whole you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:South Park: The Fractured but Whole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheJoebro64 -- TheJoebro64 (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Precious three years![edit]

Precious
Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Thing (1982 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Heard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

The Thing (1982 film)[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Thing (1982 film) has been completed.

I wanted to draw your attention to the Aftermath section – There is no mention of the outcome of Stark’s lawsuits.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the article going forward.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Twofingered Typist - Thanks for your swift response to my GOCE request. The Stark lawsuit, I literally cannot find anything on it. I had to take out a membership with newspapers.com just to get the three sources I got about the start of the lawsuit, the response, and the additional lawsuit. I'm conscious that nothing probably came of it, or very little given there is no news, but just cannot find any information about it. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome. I just put a note in parentheses that the outcomes of the suits are unknown. Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

The Thing GAR[edit]

Hi, Blake. I've taken up the article's GAR if it's alright with you. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Thing (1982 film)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Thing (1982 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 09:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

The Thing: Possible Information[edit]

Looking over the article again, there probably should be at least a brief mention of the canceled sequel to the original video game since that information is particularly noteworthy. There was an indie/fan-made sequel to the video game that was released a while ago. Don't know if it's worth mentioning or not considering it is a fan-made game (probably not). I've played the game myself and it's pretty good. Anyways, I just thought I'd mention that. Now I guess I need to get back to making my movie... Later.--Paleface Jack 16:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

I don't think a concept of a game is worth mentioning on the film page, and there isn't sufficient notability for a fan game. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:49, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

The Thing GAR[edit]

Slightlymad has put forward some comments at the GAR in case you didn't notice. Do resolve them. Thanks. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Thing (1982 film)[edit]

The article The Thing (1982 film) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:The Thing (1982 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Phil Urich Hobgoblin.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Urich Hobgoblin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested[edit]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 25 March 2018.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected[edit]

The request for formal mediation concerning Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

The Thing (1982 film)[edit]

Hi DWB:

I have finished my second copy edit of The Thing (1982 film). I went through the whole hing because there have been dozens and dozens of edits since my first effort.

You might want to consider removing most of the reviewers' names in the first and second paragraphs of the Critical Response section if they are not notable in the film reviewer community. Obviously Roger Ebert Richard Schikel and David Denby are exceptions.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns and good luck with the FA process.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Have left some comments at the FAC. cheers,Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Just a question[edit]

Do you have any books/magazines that discuss the early mature readers DC-Vertigo comic books? I just discovered how terrible Wikipedia's coverage on the subject is and am going to try and give them their own articles (or clean up existing ones). I've found some online sources but am coming up dry on interviews and the books I have don't really go that in-depth. (Also—thanks for the 1001 Games book! I was able to use it for Sonic Adventure.) JOEBRO64 19:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

No sadly not @TheJoebro64:. I had a quick Google and found these if they are any use though:

Possible Collaboration Projects[edit]

Hello DarkWarriorBlade, I forgot to congratulate you on your getting the article on The Thing up to GA status, something I've been pushing for a long time. I'm sorry about my lack of help with that, life stuff sort of made it impossible. However, based on your work on that article I had an idea for several possible articles that we can collaborate on. DarkKnight and I have been working hard on expanding the article on the character Leatherface via a userspace that I created and we're always looking for more help with that article and your the first person I thought about that could help us see it through to completion (Our goal is to get it to FA status). Another future project that we can do later down the road is this, I've started a draft for a possible article on the extraterrestrial character The Thing and since you've done some work on the previously mentioned article we can probably get a lot done via copy editing from your expanded article on Carpenter's The Thing before we have to start digging for more information. These are just a few snippets of some possible collaborations we can do. I still have a lot of non-Wikipiedia stuff I'm doing on the side so I might not get a lot done until June or so. Feel free to let me know what you think about these possible collabs.--Paleface Jack 15:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

I'll think about it, character articles aren't really my strength and I have a lot of work to do for this FA. But if I can help I will. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 20:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

No worries. Character articles weren't mine either. I had do do some research as to their structure and writing before I was able to work on them. The article on The Thing is looking great so far, good luck.--Paleface Jack 23:00, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Die Hard[edit]

TheOldJacobite is at it again in Die Hard, he has removed additional cast members and the character descriptions on it. He's gone too far with it. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Ok. Well don't get into an edit war over it, if it happens again we can discuss it on the talk page. I agree with yourself, the elimination of the vast majority of the cast and descriptions was unnecessary. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
If it happens again and the talk page is set up on it, I'll let you know. BattleshipMan (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
TheOldJacobite has reverted my edit and I reverted back. It's time to set up the talk page on Die Hard about it. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Here's the talk section about the cast section of Die Hard. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:55, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
I may need some assistance on the talk page on Die Hard again at the cast section with the user Hijiri 88. BattleshipMan (talk) 23:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
The above message reeks of canvassing. I'm really not interested in an extended discussion: I've already said my piece and I'd appreciated not being dogged on until I agree that Die Hard is a "revolutionary" film and that that has any bearing on the level of detail necessary in the plot section. Hijiri 88 (やや) 23:36, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
For the record, I am well aware of the ongoing discussion at Die Hard without battleship notifying me, just feel no need to become further involved after statements made by myself and Erik. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 16:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Venom[edit]

I have noticed that you had worked in the article Venom (comic book), which was promoted to good article in 2014. You should update it: since then a new Venom comic book was released in 2016, Eddie Brock returned to be Venom, and the "Venomverse" and "Edge of Venomverse" took place, there was a crossover with X-Men Blue, and "Venomized" started recently; among other things. By the way, I have started an article at Draft:Venomverse, which should be helpful. Cambalachero (talk) 18:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kal Ho Naa Ho/archive1[edit]

Hello, Blake. I have nominated my sixth FAC and my first one for a Hindi film. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the FAC by pinging me. Thanks. Face-smile.svg  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

moe. (band) page move[edit]

Would you be able to lend your support to a page move, please? I have asked that this page be moved, per Wikipedia's rules (here). The band's name is moe., and it is listed in all lowercase letters with the period. It follows the same rules as bill bissett, danah boyd, and k.d. lang. Thank you. 208.44.170.115 (talk) 17:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Surreal Barnstar Hires.png The Surreal Barnstar
Had to do this… couldn’t resist it.

You’ve done a magnificent job on the time you’ve spent editing and protecting Wikipedia. I hope and pray you succeed greatly in your life. Surge_Elec (talk) 22:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Venom (comic book)[edit]

Venom (comic book), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Cambalachero (talk) 16:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)