User talk:Darrenss

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The unnamed user[edit]

I know who is is. He was banned under user:potters house, than he vandelised my home page more than 20 times in june as an IP address and now he has a registered username User:Sapienz. He is a major pain in the neck and has been dificult to deal with. Plz let me know if this IP guy gives you any more trouble, so we can take the appropriate action. All the best on your edits.Darrenss 08:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I wish I knew which anon. user you're talking about, but I don't. Which one are you talking about? Gscshoyru 09:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
You may be interested to know that, while clearing out prods, I investigated Sapienz and have come to suspect him of being a sockpuppet of Potters house. So I've opened a case (ha ha) at WP:SSP if you're interested in commenting. It seems there's a long history here. Daniel Case 05:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop posting on my user page or I will report you. Sapienz 12:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Than don't come and cause PROBLEM EDITS if you won't take part in the discussion and follow WIKI POLICY. I gave you a friendly invitation to allow the good editors to explain your links are SPAM so you won't continue your erratic bahavior by sneaking around causing all soughts of problems because you can't get along with any other editors and you think everyone is out to GET YOU. <G> Darrenss 20:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

FYI: —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks I'll leave this here for evdience...Darrenss 07:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

FYI —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

What have these clips got to do with wikipedia away??Darrenss 12:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Darren, in future, don't endlessly revert vandalism, it honestly gets you nowhere and doesn't paint you in the best light. If the other side isn't listening, explain your position on his talk page and then if you need to, ask an admin to intervene or post a message at WP:AIV. User: has had at least 15 edits reverted but no message on his talk page - this makes it hard for a reviewing admin to decipher the dispute. Anyway, he's now warned. If you need any help in the future let me know. —Moondyne 08:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Potter's House Article[edit]

The edit you propose to keep contains no accurate information, contains subjective criticism and has an invalid reference and as such is better viewed as mindless vandalism. The church mailing list on the other hand is an accurate published document of all active not just planted churches. It's content can be verified by any independant person at any time since it provides names, addresses and phone numbers of all pastors for all fellowship churches. I suggest you do not simply revert my edits but discuss them with me first. Please read the edit warning provided to you by Moondyne as this seems to be a similar issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wcwarren (talkcontribs) 11:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I have overseen this article for the past 4 years and have protected it that it be maintained as a WP:NPOV, so accusing me of vandelism is a total waste of your time. I strongly urge you Wes to read through the wikipedia policies before you make a mess of the article showing your bias, as we both know you have been and are currently a member of the church for more than 10 years, you need to be careful not to show a conflict of interest. You cite that I quote unverified information but 80% of the information is unverified anyway accept that of its history, would you like to remove all of it? Furthermore wikipedia has policies of what can be used as references and external links, I urge you to go through them and familiarise yourself with what can be constituted as an encyclopedia type work, for example a in house mailing list cannot be used as a reference therefore it must be removed. I have given you sound warning I urge you to consider your edits carefully before I have to fix the problems you create on the Potter's House related articles.

Darrenss (talk) 23:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Modest Barnstar.png The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Possible outing[edit]

Hi! I've removed a comment made at the Potter's House Christian Fellowship, as it seemed to be providing your full name. I'm not sure of where you sit on this, but if you don't wish your full name to be known, you are welcome to request oversight or the deletion of the revision. I also noticed that a link was provided by you to another editor's details off-wiki. Generally the policy seems to be not to do this, although the editor in question may not have a problem with people knowing their full name. However, my general policy is to revert possible outing per the guidelines here, as I'd rather remove something which is not a problem and see it put back later than not act when it was one. - Bilby (talk) 14:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi thanks for letting me know. Darrenss (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)