User talk:Dash77

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

List of cults[edit]

In List of groups referred to as cults, one of the restrictions excludes, "fancult of popular culture". "Rae Chorze-Fwaz/Rama" appears to be such a fancult, and so I have removed it. If you'd like to make a case that it isn't then we'd all listen. talk:List of groups referred to as cults. Cheers, -Will Beback 08:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

On furhter reflection, it doesn't quite seem like a fancult. I've re-instated the entry. Cheers, -Will Beback 08:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad you have added it back in. Although Rama wrote a couple of books, and certainly his students might be described as fans of his books, the primary contact between Rama and his students was through his (sometimes controversial) spiritual teachings--not his books or other materials. A fan of JK Rowling, for example, might create a fancult around Rowling--but Rowling is primarily an author who might occasionally give a talk about her books. Rama, by contrast, was primarily a spiritual teacher (albeit controversial at times) who from time to time wrote books and composed music to support his spiritual teaching. The relationship between Rama and his students was similar to that between, say, Sai Baba and his students--and not at all like the relationship that might exist between a JK Rowling or a Stephen King and their fans. --Dash77 09:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. CattleGirl talk | e@ | review me! 08:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Reply[edit]

My edit must have been hit with a bug, since I did click rollback and the template was posted. I did remove the template. I apologize for any inconvienence that was caused. Bushcarrot (Talk·Desk) 17:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Victoria Sinclair[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Victoria Sinclair. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Sinclair. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Template:WAS[edit]

I had to restore the old date as I don't have the current WAS. We get the CFS updates but not the WAS. So all/most of the water aerodromes in Canada are based on the older version. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Copy & paste moves[edit]

Please don't try to move articles this way again. It detaches an article from its creation history. Timrollpickering (talk) 17:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

DTR[edit]

Please don't template the regulars. 117Avenue (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough, although out of respect for the fact that you are a regular here, I didn't just post the template and leave it at that, but provided some additional text explaining my position.Dash77 (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

2013 Rose Bowl[edit]

While it's highly likely that Wisconsin and Stanford will play in the game, please do not add them to the article until the BCS selections are made tomorrow. --Kevin W./TalkCFB uniforms/Talk 05:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


Nomination of Hermesmann v. Seyer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermesmann v. Seyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermesmann v. Seyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Countered (talkcontribs) 12:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CFK & Stephen Harper2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CFK & Stephen Harper2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Linda McGill[edit]

Hi, I'm Nechlison. Dash77, thanks for creating Linda McGill!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I have tagged your article [1] try to improve it and set more external links and this article needs even more content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nechlison (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linda McGill, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Topless and Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of pornographic sub-genres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topless (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

let's solve the BLP thing...[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Dash77. You have new messages at Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

L.tak (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melvin Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

You have received a reply[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:H-1B_visa&diff=666170512&oldid=666169249 10 years late, to be sure. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, as you've noted, my edits to H-1B visa and my concerns about its neutrality are from nearly 10 years ago. I believe my concerns were fairly narrow in scope and regarded certain specifics of immigration conditions from 10 years ago that may or may not still be relevant 10 years later. I noticed that you've made a fair number of recent edits to the H-1B visa page and its talk page--the scope of those comments seems considerably wider than my neutrality dispute was intended to address. Dash77 (talk) 05:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)