User talk:DavidJJJ/Archive02

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Emma Watson MySpace[edit]

No, I don't think would should add it yet. Wait to get actual confromation from Emma or one of her friends.Seven-point-Mystic 15:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moot point, the MySpace is fake. Go to the old adress and see for yourself.Seven-point-Mystic 21:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edit Button[edit]

Please remember to use the Minor Edit button for edits such as these: [1] [2] [3] [4] . Thanks! --huntersquid <°)))>< Calamari Cove 11:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Guitarists Newsletter - Issue II - October 2006[edit]

The October 2006 issue of the WikiProject Guitarists newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Aguerriero (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of WikiProject Hard Rock[edit]

You initiated the WikiProject, so I would really like it if you could look over my proposal to expand it to cover rock music in general, and make yourself heard. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hard Rock. Cheers. -- Reaper X 00:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, for sure man! Then its settled: WikiProject Hard Rock will now become WikiProject Rock music. Cheers. -- Reaper X 22:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have sent all members notices, and you are basically the only one that has provided a response. It's been over 2 weeks now. I asked the WikiProject Council, and they said it would just be easiest to move all the related pages to their new names ( ... Hard Rock → ... Rock music). Shall I get started? -- Reaper X 20:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I'll let everybody know. I have made all the page moves and it is now official, we are now part of WikiProject Rock music! Eh, and I see that you have made an invitation already. Thats awesome, if you could keep inviting people that would be great! I wanna really get this going, get more articles, members, etc. Cheers. -- Reaper X 01:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I can think of. Nothin besides getting the expansion going. More members and articles is what we need, and all that I can think of. Sorry. I never tried recruiting people, I may do that tonight as I dont have any plans. -- Reaper X 21:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rock WikiProject[edit]

I appreciate the invitation but I am spread pretty thin right now. I'm afraid I don't have spare time to join another WikiProject. Good luck though! --Aguerriero (talk) 22:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November Esperanza Newsletter[edit]

Program Feature: Admin Coaching (needs coaches!)
Admin Coaching needs coaches!!! If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider signing up to be a coach.

Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by HighwayCello, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Wikipedia policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins.

What's New?
The Tutorial Drive is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Wikipedia easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Wikipedia. Consider writing one!
A discussion on how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia has been started; please add your thoughts.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
  • The list of proposed programs has been updated, with some proposals being archived.
  • There is now a new program: the Tutorial Drive! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Wikipedia.
  • The suggestion of adding a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages is being considered; join the discussion if you are interested!
  • In order to make a useful interlanguage welcome template, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Wikipedia policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias.
  • A discussion of Esperanza's role in Wikipedia is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted!
  • Shreshth91 informed everyone that he will be leaving the Esperanza council as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election, HighwayCello.
Signed...
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

Thank you[edit]

For reverting the vandalism. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 13:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

Hello! I have left my comments on your RfA. The key message is 'get some experience', as your answers don't reveal a working knowledge of admin-related tasks, processes and duties that require your usage of the admin tools. I see above that you have the Esperanza newsletter. Take a look at the Admin coaching programme that they run, you will find that useful. Try another RfA application in 2-3000 edits time. Regards, (aeropagitica) 23:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for having to oppose your RfA, but you need to get a wider view of what adminship is all about. I'm on that same learning curve! --Steve 00:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is my regretful task to inform you that I have closed your request for adminship early as unlikely to achieve consensus. Please do not be discouraged; a number of users have had their first RfA end without consensus, but have been promoted overwhelmingly in a later request. Please continue to make outstanding contributions to Wikipedia, and consider requesting adminship again in the future. You may find Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship helpful in deciding when to consider running again. If I can be of any help to you, please do not hesitate to ask. Essjay (Talk) 06:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Thanks for asking me if I would be interested in adminship. But, I am still inactive (and hope to return in December). I will let you know when I become active again. Thanks, again. :) Cheers --soumসৌমোyasch 08:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley West[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ashley West, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Princess Tiswas 17:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DavidJJJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why I have been blocked. It appears that an imposter called DavidJJJ2 has been using my ip address. It do not know who he is. Please unblock me!

Decline reason:

See below. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 09:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We can't unblock you at this time, because you haven't given us the information we need to look into your block. You yourself were not blocked; if you were prevented from editing, you must have been autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. I'm removing your unblock request because there's nothing we can do without this information. If you are still autoblocked by the time you read this message:

  1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
    Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
  2. Try and edit the Wikipedia:Sandbox by clicking here.
  3. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Autoblocked?" section.
  4. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 09:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DavidJJJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just to let you know, I do not intend to use Wikipedia for vandalism. If you take a look at my contributions you will see that I make good contributions

Decline reason:

Not blocked. Perhaps you are autoblocked? -- Yamla 16:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 82.35.196.150 lifted or expired.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  17:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Question[edit]

Admins usually like to see at least a few thousand edits from prospective admins, plus at least six months' active participation and a good grasp of policy—subject to individuals' pereferences, of course. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

I reviewed you, and gave you some advice toward achieving your goal of admin. Cheers, -- THL 21:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. -- THL 02:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 82.45.238.117 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Luna Santin 23:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Editor review archived[edit]

Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor review/DavidJJJ/Archive02, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 22:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Rock wikiproject[edit]

Hey man, not a problem. I hope and expect the Wikiproject will blossom even more in the future. Although I am not as dedicated to Wikipedia as I used to be (due to real life), I try and attract as much attention as possible to the greatest genre of music on the planet! One of my developments today was a talk template for album/single/DVD's of Rock Wikiproject bands, {{Wikiproject Rock music disco}}. I also hope to add a rating system to the {{Wikiproject Rock music}} template much like has been done on the Alternative Rock Wikiproject's header (ie. High importance, A rating as seen on the Smashing Pumpkins talk page). I have to thank you though. If you never even initiated the project, theres no way in hell I would have even had the thought or inspiration. Cheers dude. -- Reaper X 18:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I worked coat check at a hotel today. Boring, but I got my dad to hook me up with a laptop and the password for the hotel's network. So I sent invites to all WikiProject Alternative music and WikiProject Metal participants. So expect to see a huge swarm of participants in the next couple days, I've already seen a bit in the few hours since... :D -- Reaper X 05:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

blink-182 Pop Punk vs Punk Rock vote[edit]

As you have recently contributed to the blink-182 article you might be interested in casting your vote towards reaching a final consensus on the bands genre, Pop Punk or Punk Rock, votes can be cast here. cheers mate --Dan027 07:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alkaline Trio's genre[edit]

You recently contributed to the articles Alkaline Trio and Crimson (album). Your comments in the discussion taking place on Talk:Alkaline Trio would be most welcome. --Paul Erik 20:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Hi. Remember you had offered to nominate me for adminship and I said I would let you know when I return to editing here. Well, I am fairly active for around a month now, and if you would still want to nominate me, you can. :)

By the way, I see you are also aspiring to be a sysop. I went through your contribution summary. While your edits are pretty sound, you might consider spending a bit more time in the Wikipedia namespace - policy discussions, XFDs etc. Wish you all the best. :) --soum (0_o) 10:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am sorry I forgot to inform you that my RfA was successful. Thanks for your support. --soum (0_o) 18:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative music and sources[edit]

As part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! CloudNine 09:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting userpage vandalism[edit]

Hey, thanks for keeping an eye. I bet you that was from the guy(s) behind the accounts Ghost182 (talk · contribs) or Pickoonickoo (talk · contribs). Look like sockpuppets perhaps, but scale-tippers for sure. Anyway, thanks again. -- Reaper X 17:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


DECEMBERUNDERGROUND from AFI[edit]

PLease do not change the musicstyle on this record! there are only 2 punk songs on this record and not more! so let emocore or just coldwave but not punkrock!thx AFI-PUNK

Although you may say that there are only two punk songs, most websites e.g. all music guide still catogorise the album as punk and hardcore punk, so punk can still fit with the article. Besides, that's you're opinion, where's your evidence? DavidJJJ 16:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bring Me the Horizon[edit]

Please do not move articles when there was a disussion not so long back about a move, that resulted in staying where it was. I have moved it back... Please check the talk pages before moving articles, and move history, as it may, and probably has been moved there for a reason. Asics talk Editor review! 19:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really make much of a difference. Most websites write it as Bring Me The Horizon. DavidJJJ 20:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
:: If you see the discussion, that's what I said, however the vote was not to move, so it must remain as it was.  Asics talk Editor review! 21:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Wikiproject[edit]

please add me to the wikiproject page, next to your name —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GowsiPowsi (talk)

Re: RFA[edit]

I don't know if you remember, but a few months ago i had a failed rfa. Could you please tell me if you think i'm ready for another one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidJJJ (talk • contribs)

I see that you have undergone an editor review since your first RfA and the advice given was sound. With only sixteen edits in the policyspace since your RfA - four of those to your editor review - and sixty-odd user Talk edits, a lot without edit summaries, show that you need to participate in more admin-related tasks and with a greater frequency too. You can force edit summaries in your user preferences at the top right-hand side of the Wikipedia window. Be careful to keep your comments civil though, as edit summaries such as this can be held against you as giving in to stress and biting an editor. We mustn't be anything other than polite and civil when dealing with vandals, the same as dealing with good editors in fact.
Contributions to the encyclopedia appear to be in order, but I would brush up on standards for stub articles such as Nathan Leone and ensure that you categorise and tag the articles appropriately, including sources and references to demonstrate notability where appropriate. Admins do patrol new articles and recent changes looking for such things to either delete, tag or improve. It's a job for you to do as well and where better to start than with your own articles? This would show confidence that you could talk with other editors about policies and guidelines with confidence, knowing that you were conversant in their application.
In summary, I wouldn't support you for administrator now but I would look favourably upon you in the future when I see evidence of a high standard of contribution in all of the main spaces in Wikipedia over a sustained period of time, four or more months off the top of my head. If you forget about adminship and concentrate on being a good editor you will find that the position tends to seek you out instead!
By the way, I'm the type of editor who likes to see evidence presented neatly for me to examine, so signing your Talk page edit above and linking to you RfA would really have made a better impression. It's an easy thing to forget when you're in a rush and we all make mistakes, but when you're asking about suitability for the admin tools this tends to stand out a lot. Use the 'show preview' button to guard against these mistakes in future, if you don't already. Regards, (aeropagitica) 19:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject[edit]

Within the wikiproject you created on rock, i think i'd like to set up a task force (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:TASKFORCE#Task_forces) for blues rock - surely the basis upon which all modern music originates and thus is worthy of a taskforce, possibly later a wikiproject of its own. reply soon please Buddy Dave. GowsiPowsi 21:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

excellent, but im gonna need you to ask around maybe cos i dont know jack about doing this other than pages on bands like led zep need massive reworking & could be included in this. GowsiPowsi 08:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


DECEMBERUNDERGROUND[edit]

ALRIGHT!! wICH songs from decemberunderground are punkrock?? COME ON TELL ME!!! AFI-PUNK

Alternative music WikiProject newsletter[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 1 - April 2007
"There are shitloads of meaning in the songs. I don't know what they mean, but there's still meaning there." - Liam Gallagher
Project news
New members

Swidden, CattleGirl, UncleMontezuma, Dark Devil, RedHotRageSlave, Kudasai, Sjones23, Triviumchick1990 and Mr Richardson joined the alternative music ranks during April.

Editors

User:CloudNine

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Delivered by CloudNine 14:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Rancid (band) - Pop Punk[edit]

There has been no dissent since you brought it up so I added pop punk to Rancid's genres.--Dr who1975 17:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject: Rock[edit]

Hi, I was looking around wikipedia for other editors involved in editing rock related articles. I'm involved in the Elvis Presley page and wonder if this would be a worthy subject of the projects efforts and if so, how I would go about soliciting help towards clean-up, proof-reading, additional info and generally preparing the article for Good status and Featured status. Could you reccomend a course of action on this? --Northmeister 21:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 82.35.129.68 lifted or expired.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  07:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative music WikiProject newsletter[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 2 - May 2007
"I will most certainly not be wearing black and lipstick in 2011. That’s a guarantee." - Robert Smith
Project news
New members

Burnedthru, TommyStardust, Grovermj, KamrynMatika, Merzbow and Cbing01 all joined the alternative music fold during May.

Editors

User:CloudNine

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Delivered by CloudNine 11:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

business[edit]

what was the homework david????????????


matt b

WikiProject Alternative music June 2007 Newsletter

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 3 - June 2007
"I had a pair of cotton black pants, and I wore them every day for months. And Bill hung them outside the van 'cos they smelled so bad. And they flapped off on the highway. They were the only ones I had." - Michael Stipe
Project news
New members

Riana, Kyjb70 and Scarps joined the alternative music fold during June.

Editors

User:CloudNine


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC) . [reply]

(WikiProject Rock music) I'd welcome your comments[edit]

Hi David! I recently joined your project, and am a little bit dissatisfied after seeing how it fares compared to other projects like WikiProject Alternative music. I'd love to see the project flourish, though. To address my concerns and eventually give the project some inertia, I've started a discussion at the Project talk page. Would love to hear your thoughts! Best wishes, Johnnyw talk 12:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative music July 2007 Newsletter

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 4 - July 2007
"Thurston Moore? Is that your real name? I mean, give me a break. You made that up. That's a good one. Did you have a mom and shit like that?" - Gibby Haynes
Project news
New members

Killereditors, Xihix, M2Ys4U and Lostvalley joined the alternative music fold during July.

Editors

User:CloudNine, User:WesleyDodds


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 21:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC) . [reply]

U2 Wikiproject[edit]

Hello, I am a member of the U2 Wikiproject and am currently coordinating a Collaboration of the Month/Fortnight. I was directed by LaraLove to come to one of you about how to set it up. Could you help? Thanks so much, Neranei T/C 17:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative music August 2007 Newsletter[edit]

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 5 - August 2007
"The amount of time it took to get Morrissey onstage was getting longer and longer. There was this great game he'd play of wanting to be asked 15 times if it had been 14 the night before. Johnny was like, 'Let's rock!' and Mozzer would be 'Well, somebody's gotta ask me another seven times.'" - Andy Rourke
Project news
New members

Freaky4jesus32, Razorblade666, and Grim-Gym joined the alternative music fold during August.

Editors

User:WesleyDodds


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC) . [reply]

Band[edit]

Hey Buddy Dave Ive finally logged in. Anyway can u bring in ur guitar on Monday please. reply on my page so I know youve read this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GowsiPowsi (talk • contribs) 01:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative music September 2007 Newsletter

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter
Issue 6 - September 2007
"It's funny; recently I've started to notice people's impersonations of me, and it's basically like a hyperactive child. I'm a big fucking spaz."- Dave Grohl
Project news
New members

User:Dihydrogen Monoxide and User:Connorhalsell joined the alternative music fold during September.

Editors

User:CloudNine


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Xihix 23:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidJJJ/Archive02&oldid=1083582854"