User talk:Davion Robinson

Davion Robinson, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Davion Robinson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Yusof Mutahar[edit]

Hello, Davion Robinson

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bishal Shrestha and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Yusof Mutahar, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusof Mutahar (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bishal Shrestha}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bishal Shrestha (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 09:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davion Robinson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't understand how the person determined that I got paid to make pages on wiki. If you can find out I got paid, Can't you find out that I didn't got paid? This is really sad when you block for a reason which never did. I'm strongly requesting you to review my account if I edited to get pay. Also, do you think someone gonna pay for Wiki page where everyone know it's free and anyone can make/edit pages hereDavion Robinson (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You have only addressed a very small part of the reason behind your block. You need to address all parts. And yes, people regularly pay other people to edit Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Davion Robinson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your kind response. And I didn't knew people do so. About the unblock request: As you said I have only addressed a very small part of the reason behind the block and need to address all parts, can you please kindly explain the full part for the block so that I can explain and address all the part? Thanks Yamla

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, not an unblock request. The stated reason for the block is "Spam / advertising-only account, covert advertising, failure to disclose paid contributions and highly likely sock/meatpuppetry". Please read WP:GAB to learn how to craft an unblock request likely to be accepted. 331dot (talk) 14:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.