User talk:Dawn Bard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

"So fix it"...[edit]

Hey Dawn, sorry if this attempt at a bit of humor on my part made you feel put on the spot, wasn't my intent if so. But, thought behind it wasn't a joke--you generate a lot of work for the admins patrolling WP:AIV, WP:UAA, etc. to handle, and I think it'd be more efficient if you could handle those sorts of actions yourself. Please consider it... cheers! Zad68 14:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey Zad, no apologies necessary. I was just surprised anyone really noticed me, but I'm definitely flattered by the suggestion. I did go and check out the RFA process after your comment - so it seems you've planted an idea in my head. You're right about efficiency - a lot of the spam/promotional accounts I report to UAA are so blatant that it would be pretty uncontroversial to just zap them myself if I had the ability. Anyway, all this to say I'm considering it. Thanks! Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Great! Face-smile.svg I'll be watching this space. Zad68 18:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I second that, having run into you lots at UAA, and thereabouts. Matty.007 19:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
  • If you wanted a co-nominator, let me know. Since I've become an admin, I've come across your reports and tags on a regular basis, and everything points to the fact that you would make an excellent admin. You and I have both been involved with Wikipedia for about the same time, we both have done work in similar semi-administrative areas, and I just came through a very successful RFA - and I think you are even more qualified. Plus, another Canadian admin would just be a bonus... :) Just send me an email if an RFA is something that interests you. Singularity42 (talk) 00:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


Have you given any more thought...[edit]

...about what was discussed here? Zad68 20:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

(Wow, that was nearly a year ago!) Yes, I have, I must say. Especially today, when it would have been really nice to just block the penis-pics guy instead of having to report him and keep reverting. Maybe it's time for an RfA? Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 01:23, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Aaron Schnobrich[edit]

Hi. I removed your A7 tag on this article because it wasn't an appropriate use of A7. Even though the article is unsourced, the claims made in it are credible (i.e. the film exists and IMDB at least confirms the subjects connection), and they could lead to the subject being determined notable at AfD. agtx 18:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay, that makes sense. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Randy Quaid[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Randy Quaid. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White House Press Secretary[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White House Press Secretary. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Karl Marx[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Karl Marx. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marlon Brando[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marlon Brando. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gillian Keegan[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gillian Keegan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)