User talk:Deli nk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Feel free to drop me a note on this page. (Old discussions can be found here: Archive)

About becoming an administrator[edit]

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your all contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

If you have already taken the poll recently, please disregard this notice.

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll give it some thought. Deli nk (talk) 12:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Post editing[edit]


I have edit the post regarding the weight loss to add up more appropriate information as the article and site which i link to that was good written and providing the relevant and solid information. Will you please re-review my edit as there was no spam in the content page which i linked, further you also mention the Wikipedia guideline page, and i have already read it and following there terms and conditions. If you could explain further regarding this edit i will be thankful, as i just wanted to be an active part of Wikipedia.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indoorwar (talkcontribs) 19:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC) is simply not an appropriate reference for Wikipedia content, particularly for medical content. Please see WP:RS and WP:MEDRS for details. Deli nk (talk) 20:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

18:21:00, 2 August 2017 review of submission by Masterchefs[edit]

My apologies and hope the edit version works and I was mindful of the feedback. Masterchefs (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Request on 18:02:19, 18 August 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Sanjeewa Malaviarachchi[edit]

Sanjeewa Malaviarachchi (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Regarding the references, I have added notable references. However, i is still not accepted. Please see the similar page of Geological Society of India, which is already accepted without significant or notable references. One of its references are just a self reference of a person. Then how could it be notable? I think I need a fair decision. Please see my page carefully and compare it with that of the Geological Society of India. I need robust answer, and please do not swing.

Thanks for the comments.

At this point, I still think the article lacks sufficient references independent of the Society that support its notability as an organization. For example, are there any new articles written about the Society? I'll let someone else have a look and review the submission. Deli nk (talk) 19:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to write me a message regarding my posts on financial history. As a historian on the subject matter, I would like to reassure you that I have taken your comments seriously. I appreciate it. JHerbstman — Preceding unsigned comment added by JHerbstman (talkcontribs) 17:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)