User talk:Deus Caritas Est

Information about Incidents at Mexico City Airport un-deleted

• Mexico City International Airport

Well, part of what I understand that should be provided as information about airports, is the Incidents and Accidents section. As you can see on some other airport pages around the world, the accidents refer to those events which include fatalities, while the incidents refer to the events where no fatalities can be found. Therefore, both of the Aeroméxico minor crashes are considered as incidents, especially since both of them caused several problems with the aircraft involved. That is the reason why I un-deleted them once since somebody wrote the report months ago and somebody else had deleted them already. The second incident even caused the B777 to remain grounded for a couple of months. Luisrmb 772 (talk) 04:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Luisrmb_772

PHL-CDG

I am not sure where are you getting that AF's PHL-CDG is ending but i have undid your edits since AF365/366 (PHL-CDG-PHL) is still flying on March 31 and it is still bookable on their website for that date. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 04:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

UA LAX-BKK

Also, check schedules on united.com, no LAX-BKK flights run under the same flight number. UA 891 only flies LAX-NRT, with no connecting flights. Only flight that continues from NRT with same plane and flight number is UA837 (SFO-NRT-BKK). Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 02:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey Deus Caritas Est! I went in and looked for flights on united.com and indeed there is an LAX-BKK direct flight on UA but will not be direct until October 26. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 03:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

United service to Guangzhou

Stop removing Guangzhou! UA received authority to fly to Guangzhou from SFO. The flight is just delayed one year due to high fuel costs. Just because the flight has been delayed doesn't mean its cancelled. American Airlines and US Airways have delayed their flights to Beijing until 2010 and they are still flying. Also, CAN is cited w/source and pleawe don't remove edits that have sources. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 04:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Former destinations

From what I know we are to not list former destinations from airport articles. We DO list them from airline destination lists, but not from airport articles. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

PHX

Please stop reverting. If your going to list all 1 stop service you have ALOT of work to do with PHX for DL, UA, NW, AA which provide many destination via same plane service and flight number. Otherwise all destinations listed are NON STOP ONLY

If your going to apply AM PHX-HMO-MEX as a destination i suggest you go threw all other airlines serving PHX and their 1 stop same plane/flight number cities. otherwise you are NOT providing accurate information. And many will agree if you were to do that you will face much opposition by everyone else since no other airport lists all their 1 stop service, especially via domestic carriers Daltnpapi4u (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

MEX Airport

I am sorry but the thing is that you keep undoing that format that almost every major airport in the world is adopting. Take a look at some airport's pages and then go ahead and change whatever you want, but that chart is staying...

• Charles de Gaulle International Airport
• Narita International Airport
• Madrid Barajas International Airport
• John F. Kennedy International Airport —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luisrmb 772 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)