User talk:Dimanovski

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding your edit to Macedonia (Greece):[edit]

Your recent edit to Macedonia (Greece) (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism or link spam to the page. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 02:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Macedonia[edit]

If you wish to provide information on the Republic of Macedonia, please visit the article on the Republic and add your contribution there. The article on Macedonia (Greece) is about the part of Macedonia (region) that is part of Greece. You are welcome to provide information about Macedonia (Greece). However, replacing the entire content of an article by unrelated content may be considered WIkipedia:Vandalism. However, edits done in good faith are not vandalism.

On behalf of the Wikipedia community, I welcome you and am looking forward to your fruitful contributions.

If you have reservations about the content of an article, you are welcome to leave your comments on the article's talk page, (also called discussion page), in this instance Talk:Macedonia (Greece). To add a comment, select the tab marked with a + sign, put a short summary as the subject/heading, and add your comments to the text box below. Please sign your contribution to talk pages by typing four tilde characters like this: ~~~~. For more information about editing Wikipedia, click on the "help" link underneath the Wikipedia logo to access Wikipedia:help.

Note that the Macedonian question is a controversial topic, and has been discussed thoroughly within the Wikipedia community. Visit the various discussion pages to get an idea of the very varied opinions of the other editors. Some talk pages have grown considerably over time and earlier discussion have been archived, for example in Talk:Macedonia (Greece)/Archive03. Sincerely,  Andreas  (T) 02:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam warning for third offense[edit]

Please stop. If you continue spamming, as you did in Illuminati, you will be blocked from editing. MSJapan 04:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of PressOnline[edit]

A tag has been placed on PressOnline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TNX-Man 13:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Helsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Yavoh 21:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Helsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 07:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 07:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Хелсиншки комитет за човекови права на Република Македонија requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Favonian (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Хелсиншки комитет за човекови права на Република Македонија, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 22:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Helsinki Committee For Human Rights Of The Republic Of Macedonia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mhc.org.mk/print.asp?ItemID=77A33F9395E9D545B11DE9FFC2F51EA0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Helsinki Committee For Human Rights Of The Republic Of Macedonia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Favonian (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PressOnline[edit]

The article PressOnline has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct news website that comes across as a advertisement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]