This user has file mover rights on the English Wikipedia
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Dom497

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nuvola apps personal unisex.png Nuvola apps filetypes.png Symbol GA & FA.jpg Nuvola apps kedit.svg Crystal Clear app korganizer.png Original Barnstar Hires.png
User Talk Promoted Content Contributions Guestbook Awards

Another thing[edit]

My submissions page is still the old one from the first GA-cup. Should I just blank in preparation for the new cup? When I try to start up a new submissions page, it directs me to the old one. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 00:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

@Jonas Vinther: Per the instructions, "If you participated in the 2014-15 GA Cup, your submissions page still exists. When you enter your username, you will be taken to your page. Please remove all the content in it and replace it with the content from Step IV".--Dom497 (talk) 00:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
I've deleted all in the old submissions page, but the new blanked page is not listed Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GA Cup/Submissions??? Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your price!) 12:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
@Jonas Vinther: Please read the instructions. Start at step 1.--Dom497 (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Is this a copyright violation?[edit]

In my GA review, I was checking the copyvios status of the article (Angry Video Game Nerd) and it said 77.3% chance of a violation. Now, I'm unsure whether this is because people copy Wikipedia or if the writer copied the website. Could you please give me a second opinion on it? The review is located at: Talk:Angry Video Game Nerd/GA1--Anarchyte 11:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: I never even knew the copyvio tool existed; going to make my life a lot easier now! But it looks like, for the most part, only words/pairs of words are highlighted as copyvios, not entire sentences. However, there are some full sentences that are highlighted, so I would suggest asking the nominator to reword those sections. Other than that, the small blocks of words should be fine. Feel free to ask any other questions you may have! :) --Dom497 (talk) 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
@Dom497: Hello again, would Ref10 be reliable? []. I don't know for sure because on WP:VIDEOREF it says "[...] self-published media is often not acceptable as a source". --Anarchyte 02:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)