User talk:Doomsdayer520

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Help me to review a page[edit]

I love how neutral you are, and would love you to look into this page TG Omori, thank you Amosflash (talk)

Thank you so much sir, I really appreciate you, kindly help on this too DJ Tunez,thank you for the encouragement as an editor

Help me to review a page[edit]

Fist of all thank you for the review of Alia's Birth. Can you please review that directors latest film: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Erēmīta_(Anthologies)


Thanks in advance :Doomsdayer520! (Jakoobcherry (talk))

Dotty (Scalac 3) submission rejected[edit]

Hi, Can you tell me what's the reason behind the rejection of my article? My intention definitely wasn't to advertise anything or anyone, but I can't see what's wrong. Could you please point it out to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DariaKarasek (talkcontribs) 14:51, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

@DariaKarasek: -- Sorry for the delay in this response. The problem is that there is nothing to say about the Dotty programming language beyond the fact that it will soon be released. Wikipedia is not a directory of products and Dotty must make some sort of impact, as reported in reliable media, before it qualifies for a Wikipedia article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
@DOOMSDAYER: -- Hi, thank you very much for the explanation. I understand that Dotty itself may not seem to represent a lot for someone out of IT world or Scala programming language. However, in the IT world it's a huge milestone in the Scala Programming Language Development. As you've probably read Dotty is the third version of Scala Programming Language which is well known and used by the leading brand all over the world. Scalac 3 could be an update on Scala Programming language, however, the changes introduced by the official www.scala-lang.org website as well as the official announcements by the Scala Creator Martin Odersky - both sources mentioned in my article - are quite significant. That's probably why the creators gave the third version it's own name - Dotty. I'm afraid that the official programming language website could be the most reliable media there is when it comes to this kind of content. DariaKarasek (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
@DariaKarasek: - Those matters could possibly be added as current developments in the existing article for Scala (programming language). When/if Dotty becomes a matter of public interest beyond the professional community, in which case it will be reported by the reliable media sources noted above, it may become eligible for its own Wikipedia article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Little Quirks[edit]

Thanks for closing the AfD: am I allowed to remove the AfD 'plate from the article or is this done automatically?shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and removed the 'plate and added an Old AfD 'plate to the talkpage.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
@Shaidar cuebiyar: -- I believe that "Old AfD" template move can be done manually as you did, OR a bot does it within 24 hours. Either way, I forgot to do it myself. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
No drama, mate. Alls good.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Melissa B. Article[edit]

Hello - I understand that you wanted to vote to delete my page and honestly there are a ton of articles that I can show you that I can barely find on a artist. I was asked to give valid information in which I did. This is the timeline of a real artist. All the research I did in order to get this article up was not easy. I was told to give the facts. This person has a history and you can not negate that fact. I feel this article is really good based on the amount of information I had to dig in the internet. I would ask that you be very open and knowing that I can point out alot of other articles I have seen that you would tear up worst. I also want to point out "Notability is determined, essentially, by what reliable sources say about a subject. Basically, whether the subject has been significantly "noted", rather than simply being potentially "noteworthy". Sources need to be independent of the subject of the article, with a reputation for fact-checking and oversight, because sources close to the subject might naturally be biased or promotional. I hope you help me make this article better on Melissa B. Itgemgirl1 (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

  • @Itgemgirl1: - It's a community vote so you are welcome to say all of this at the deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa B.. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia in which people and things have to qualify for inclusion. I don't think Melissa B. quite makes it but others in that community discussion could disagree. There would be no problem publishing what you found about the singer at other websites. And just note that you should not take any of this personally, and the article now belongs to everyone in the Wikipedia community (see WP:OWN). ––DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 19:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)