User talk:Dr who1975

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Does anyone else here think that Wikipedia is run chiefly by losers who have nothing better to do? I have a family, a job, and a life so I don't have time to argue and have constant revision wars with a guy sitting at a computer in his mom's basement.


Proposed deletion of Damien Dark[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Damien Dark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No need for disambiguation — Neither of the articles listed have any relation to "Damien Dark" (even the sections); also, neither of the articles/sections include any alternative titles related to "Damien Dark".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 03:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Why would you propose this for deletion when all you needed to do was revert it to my redirect that I originally put up... it was another person who attempted to turn it to a disambiguation not me.--Dr who1975 (talk) 05:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Bomb Trains listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bomb Trains. Since you had some involvement with the Bomb Trains redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Wetback, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Eteethan(talk) 22:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

That was years ago. I no longer care enough about wikipedia to be disruptive anymore.... so yes... I've already stopped. I've also received many warnings about this sort of editing already so I don't understand the purpose of this message about something I did before I received such warnings. Seems more like bullying than anything else. But thanks for the stern talking to.--Dr who1975 (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

June 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jon Snow (character), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 01:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 01:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Why did you message me twice?--Dr who1975 (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Andy Comeau for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Comeau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Comeau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)