# User talk:Dragons flight

A message left at Module talk:Citation/CS1/Archive 9#Change to lua library yesterday suggests that some code you wrote for the Citation Style 1 module is going to die on 18 February 2014. In particluar, mw.message.newRawMessage is going away. This seems a rather hard deadline. I'm concerned because I'm not quite clear on what's happening in that library function. Your change to use the library happened with this edit.

Can I go back to the pre-library function code without problems or is mw.message.newRawMessage doing other things for us that will require additional code?

Trappist the monk (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

## A barnstar for you!

 The Original Barnstar WIKI I LOVE YOU FOR KNOWLDGE DONER AND PROFESIONALLY OPSORVER FOR ALL TECHNICAL USERS. Qureshi2014 (talk) 07:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

## A barnstar for you!

 The Editor's Barnstar For helping n exploration into an under-reported aspect of LGBT culture. Sportfan5000 (talk) 23:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

## I created an article about you

The article is, unsurprisingly, here: Robert Rohde.

What do you think? Jinkinson talk to me 17:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

## Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Climate scientist opinion.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

## Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

## Keeping track of DOIs used.

Of interest to all devs on the Lua module Citation/CS1 , , @Wikid77:

I'm working on the Open-Access Signalling Project, which aims to upload the full article text to wikisource and link it to the reference in Wikipedia. I'm writing the bot at the moment to do this, and I'm encountering a question - how do I keep track of the values of the template {{Cite doi}} and the doi parameter of {{Cite journal}}, in as close to real-time as possible?

Is it possible to modify code of {{Cite journal}} in such a way that it will make a record or push a stream of when the "doi" paramter is changed?

The most efficient approach I can come up with at the moment is to query the SQL servers on Labs in constant loop, returning the results of "What transcludes {{Cite doi}} and {{Cite journal}}" and seeing if the last_edited timestamp is newer than previous? If the last_edit is newer, then get the content of the page and see if the doi values has changed, checking against a local database. But this seems horribly ineffecient.

Thanks, Maximilianklein (talk) 18:43, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

If I understand what it is that you want, and I'm not sure that I do, I suspect that what you're looking for is not possible. But is 'real-time' tracking of the |doi= parameter in {{cite journal}} citations really necessary? Documents with doi identifiers don't change.
Trappist the monk (talk) 12:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

## Template:RemoveCoins

Hi Dragons flight. Is Template:RemoveCoins, which you created, still required? If not, I'll nominate it for deletion (or you can, if you prefer). Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

I deleted it. Dragons flight (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 21:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

## You do realize

That the U. S. Senate is one of the two Houses of the American legislature? μηδείς (talk) 04:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Where did I say otherwise? Dragons flight (talk) 04:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

## gravitation

Two last posts and then I go sleeping.

## Gravitation Relativity Cosmology

I have put a small exercise

## N738139

I am sorry to disturb you. I know you have other things to do than to answer my questions. But if we consider :

 High gravity on A, low gravity on B.

 :*Synchro0 : 00h00 on the two glocks.
:*Synchro1 : 01h00 on glock A 00h59 on B.
:*Synchro2 : sunrise, 02h00 on A 01h58 on B.
:*Synchro3 : sunset, 06h00 on A 05h54 on B.

 The referential was A, now lets with B:
:*Synchro0 : 00h00 on the two glocks.
:*Synchro1 : 01h01 on glock A 01h00 on B.
:*Synchro2 : sunrise, 02h02 on A 02h00 on B.
:*Synchro3 : sunset, 06h06 on A 06h00 on B.

 B has to compare data with A at 6h00 for A. It means 5h54 for B


Am I wrong ?

## Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Risks and Impacts of Global Warming.png

Thank you for uploading File:Risks and Impacts of Global Warming.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

## RfA data

Hi Dragons flight. I've been thinking about collecting and analysing some RfA data and stumbled across your probability plot today. Just wondering how you collected the data for that plot and whether you wrote up any further analysis of it? Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

## Revise caption on File:Climate science opinion2.png ?

You may recall a discussion of this then-new chart at New bar chart. You seemed to agree that it would be better to change "Largely caused by humans" to "Significant human impact."

This never got done, and the issue has been revived at Graphic.

Would you be able to edit the chart to read ""Significant human impact?" This would seem to match the survey results more closely. Thanks in advance, Pete Tillman (talk) 04:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Already done by another editor. You might check in at the discussion, to see if you agree with the mods proposed. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

## Orphaned non-free image File:Risks and Impacts of Global Warming.png

Thanks for uploading File:Risks and Impacts of Global Warming.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

## Thanks

I have a problem with my email, can you send me a message so I see if you get the response? Thanks μηδείς (talk) 23:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

I sent you a test email. Dragons flight (talk) 23:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
OKay, thanks. it's half past noon, NY time, and I am sending an email through wikipedia, with an identifier word so we know we are speaking of the same mail. Please let me know if you get it. μηδείς (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
After you told me to look for it I found it in my spam folder. Under ordinary circumstances, I almost never check the spam folder so there would be a high probability of missing it, if you hadn't mentioned that it was coming. Keyword: Smaug. Google also added a big warning bar over top of it that said: "Be careful with this message. Our systems couldn't verify that this message was really sent by yahoo.com. You might want to avoid clicking links or replying with personal information." Dragons flight (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Okay, thanks, that's extremely helpful. (I got a notice at 12:42 NYC time the message had been returned undeliverable.) I will simply delete the yahoo account, which seems entirely useless and create a new one. Feel free to delete or archive this, you've been very helpful. μηδείς (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

## Thanks, again

 The Tireless Contributor Barnstar You probably deserve an email barnstar, but I like spinny objects, so thanks for the help. μηδείς (talk) 22:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

## Precious

Thank you, veteran editor devoting your life to earth sciences, climatology and related areas, on scientific background, for custom graphics, for starting Religious cosmology ("creating the hopes of stopping the religion edit wars"), for creating modules including one that intentionally does nothing, for "clear the head", - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (23 June 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1057 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democrat and Republican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

## WP:ITN/Candidates you've been quoted

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. μηδείς (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for unblocking! It is sad that I have to waste my time on vandals Lackope. Have you seen this [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] Montenegrins have become Serb-Montenegrins who speak only Serbian. Will Ukrainians in Canada to become a Russian-Ukrainians in Canada? I have to draw on each talk page that I'm right. [6], [7]... and others have him corrected --ChumleeS (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

## Lackope

I've noticed you've blocked the above mentioned user recently. I just want to point out that he is at it again. I've been following him for the past couple of weeks and this user is showing highly disruptive behavior. Now, while I don't agree entirely with ChumleeS method (he should have reported him already several times instead of reverting him) I believe his intentions are in good faith. This is not some content dispute, this is one user deleting content from one page (sourced with reliable references) and inserting content with dubious references (tabloids, daily portals, etc.) on other pages. I also believe this user has one other clone account User:Mitrale89 and also that he he was the same anon user User:212.200.65.244 which I personally reported and which got blocked about a week or so ago...they all have same modus operandi, same interests and identical rhetoric. Shokatz (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

this is not true because I do not disrupt anything I just enter valid sources in articles about Serbs, but for weeks these users(Shokatz and ChumleeS) remove sources because they do not like their content for i believe political reasons because they are from Croatia and Montenegro,and I do not have any clone account it is a ridiculous accusation. Lackope (talk) 14:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)lackope

## Hayo!

Also, have a pizza!

Hello friend. :-) Guess who's come back (kinda) from the dead after 5 years? It's a good feeling to be seeing so many familiar names from "back then" still active. How's been the wiki life been treating you? What big things are happening around lately? —Миша13 16:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

## Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Edit count

A tag has been placed on Template:Edit count requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. APerson (talk!) 14:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

## Globalwarmingart.com down?

Hi DF,

I hope you are well! I have trouble accessing http://www.globalwarmingart.com from the university network (and sorry haven't tried any other). Is there a problem on your end? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

This seems to have resolved itself. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 22:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

## A barnstar for you!

 The Technical Barnstar For fixing all of our Special:AbuseFilter problems. It was very frustrating for some of us to try and make sense of how the extension works. Fortunately you came through and provided the documentation WMF did not, did all the dirty work yourself, and now it's very clear what implementation techniques we should adapt moving forward. A thousand and one thanks! :) 22:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

## Filter 667

You seem to be much better than me at predicting how many conditions a filter is going to take based on the syntax. Can you take a look at 667 and see if you can tweak it?—Kww(talk) 02:14, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

## Permissions for edit notice editing

Hello, a proposal to change the permissions required for editing edit notices is taking place at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Proposed_permissions_change:_Edit_Notices; as you have edited recent pages related to this topic your feedback is welcome. Happy editing, — xaosflux Talk 21:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

## Update your abuse filter: New user removing speedy deletion templates (29)

Please modify the above filter: Change "Warn, Tag" to "Warn, Disallow". WhiteWindow (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

## Cervantes

The source cited but not quoted is 2008. Nothing is said about the proper attribution, and copvio covers unattributed statements of other authors even if they are out of copyright. It seems the 2008 source is inappropriate. Until the the copyvio tag should stand. As for the tools, I get "server error" when I try to check the rest of the text. But if you've read any of it it is a load of copy and paste not suitable for the project. If the 2008 source is proper, it is not attributed or put in quote marks. μηδείς (talk) 04:36, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Though related (and often simultaneous), WP:COPYVIO and WP:PLAGIARISM are separate issues. My contention is that {{copyvio}} is not appropriate for issues that consist solely of plagiarism. (I'm not saying that plagiarism is not an important issue, just that the full blanking of copyvio is not generally regarded as an appropriate or approved response.) Any way, I intend to step out of it, and let other people decide what to do, which is why I left a message at ANI. Dragons flight (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
This is the first time I have dealt with such an issue. I replied at ANI. If plagiarism is the "real" issue, that's fine with me. But the cited source is from 2008, so we seem to be stealing from them what stolt from others. I think a response from a regular copyvio editor can be awaited. I fear a large part of the article is below standards for more mundane reasons, but our disclaimer says copyvios will be deleted on sight. μηδείς (talk) 04:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

## Invitation

Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, Dragons flight,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you posted to a feedback page for VisualEditor. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work well for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

## Edit_filter#Feature_requests

Hi,

This has reference to your post at Wikipedia_talk:Edit_filter#Feature_requests. I am one of admin at mr language wikipedia and have been working on/maintaining mr wiki edit filters regularly.

I have registered quite a few feature request bugs on phabricator which will be help full for edit filter manager/admins and make their work easier, as below

क्रमांक Feature request Benefit or Purpose Phabricator no
1 Special:AbuseLog should be filterable by action taken, e.g. "disallow" disallowing filters and disallowed edits would be monitored more effectivelly (for falls positives etc.) T50961
2 Special:Tags - Tagged changes to show total of only currently visible logged numbers making Special:Tags user friendly for patrolling purposes T50369
3 Option to group filters & their logs Building and using a group of filters as deterence capability as and when needed; Easier for monitoring and improving specific group of filters; Easier for patrolling specific group of tasks of their choice for patrollers T49531
4 additional options to rate limit trigger More effective filter management, smarter messaging which will reduce feeling of harrassment on part of unconfirmed editors; will help to improve common editor's perception of edit filters as a good freindly facility. T49493
5 Ability to match text based on a negative lookbehind/lookahead regex edit filters work to the point; become more effective in controlling abuse T49495

Besides I am looking for earlier resolution of two priority bugs namely T21565 and T48773. Resolution of this will help wikimedia commons, many small wiki's and to some extant en wiki too.

• Edit filters can track file uploads, they can track comments of files; but can not track upload and comments together and in T21565 we need to achieve the same.
• About T48773 I suppose wikimedia software/search works properly about unicode word borders but unfortunately edit filter has not been able to do it till now, T48773 bug has critical importance level for indic wiki's, and certainly be useful to effectively control vandalism using indic script even on en wiki.

This is just to keep you informed and request whatever help possible about above fearure and problem bugs

Thanks and rgds

Mahitgar (talk) 11:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

## Barnstar

 The Admin's Barnstar For the thoughtful comments and excellent judgement you show throughout Wikipedia including on edit filters, the reference desk, and ITN, I hereby award you this Barnstar. Keep up the good work. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Oddly enough, I don't think I've gotten the Admin barnstar before. One more for the collection. Dragons flight (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

## Just touching base

Hi, Dragons flight. Since it's been a few days, I wanted to touch base and let know that I did answer the links request you posted at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive221#Infobox technical request. Thank you again for taking the time to look at this. With regards, Tenebrae (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

## Hillary Rodham Clinton - Move Discussion

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

## Talkback

Hello, Dragons flight. You have new messages at Samwalton9's talk page.
Message added 08:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sam Walton (talk) 08:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

## re: Graph update

Looking fwd to it! Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Excellent. I think Wikipedia:Signpost would be interested in the story; I'd be happy to help write one. In fact, this kind of research could even be published on Wikimania/Wikisym, or in an academic paper. Let me know if you'd like some assistance with either, as you may know, I've been involved with professionally researching Wikipedia for a long time. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Robert, for purposes of this graph, what exactly constitutes a "typical edit"? Carrite (talk) 22:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Which graph are you referring to, because to the one Piotrus is referring to doesn't have "typical edit" anywhere on it? Dragons flight (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Wikipedia account age of average edit by registered user.png Carrite (talk) 01:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
It's just a colloquial way of saying average. Specifically, each edit by a non-bot registered user is associated with an account age (defined as the months elapsed since first edit by that account) and the plotted value is the mean of those associated ages for all edits made during each month. Dragons flight (talk) 02:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

## Per edit filter condition load

Hi Dragons flight. Any idea where we are with getting some profiling back for edit filters? It would be great to be able to find the worst offenders for hitting the condition limit again. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

It's been discussed some, but nothing has been done. I would like to implement an updated version myself if no one gets to it, but I am currently very busy and am unsure when I might get to it. So, probably not soon. Dragons flight (talk) 01:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

## User:Dragons flight/2015 editing analysis

Dear Dragons flight,

how have you created those diagrams in detail? I would like to generate them for German Wikipedia, too.--Kopiersperre (talk) 17:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I downloaded the stub-meta-history dump of enwiki from dumps.wikimedia.org (43 GB), which contains revision metadata but not page contents. The analysis was done myself using custom code written in Python and Matlab. If that sound like something you would be interested in doing, I could see about sending you the code. To be honest, I never really finished the analysis. I have meant to do a full write-up and add a few more images, but I've been preoccupied with real-life events the last couple months. Dragons flight (talk) 19:53, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
I would like to do it, but in the moment my internet is too slow for doing anything. May you send me the code anyway, that I don't forget, what I'm planning to do? (I've sent you a wikimail.)--Kopiersperre (talk) 20:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

## Pls, help with Module:Coordinates for ky.wikipedia.org

Hello,

Our Infobox_settlement template returns "Lua error in Module:Coordinates at line 626: attempt to call field 'getEntityObejct' (a nil value)" error. Forexample in Айхах article.

--Chorobek (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

## EF 31

Per request, I went ahead and did what would otherwise be extremely tedious for people without scripting. There's clearly lots of room to optimize (e.g., spaces to \s+, repeats, combining penises (a phrase not often said :P), etc...), but that should get the ball rolling. --slakrtalk / 14:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

## Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

## WP:Edit filter/Draft

Hi Dragons flight. Sorry for so many messages about the edit filter recently, but we're close to proposing the draft guideline and I noticed you said you wanted to have some input on it but haven't done so yet. Just a reminder about that as we'll likely be proposing it soon if nothing comes up. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

## Renaming Module:Citation/CS1

Please see Module talk:Citation/CS1/Archive 12#Requested move 9 September 2015. Whoever closes this move request may be unaware of whether it will break anything. Since you've edited the file, you may want to comment. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

## Some Graphs - Visualizing Editor Cohort Trends

I've put together some graphs that visualize editor activity, retention etc. I made a presentation for the research team at the foundation - http://slides.com/cosmiclattes/edit-activity-graphs-analysis/. It also has some of the preliminary results. It has links to the graphs & says how to interpret & play with them. Let me know if you need any help in interpreting them or if you have other metrics you'd like to see graphed. I'd love to hear what you think of them.

## A barnstar for you!

 The Admin's Barnstar Thank you for the full and transparent closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Mohamed (student) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I came here to give you pretty much the exact same barnstar. I was considering closing that one myself, but I was not around at the time. It was a difficult close and I think you handled it very well. HighInBC (was Chillum) 16:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Seconded. — Cirt (talk) 01:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

## A barnstar for you!

 The Admin's Barnstar Closing an AfD per BLP1E in concordance with what BLP1E actually says? A remarkable feat! WilyD 12:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Seconded. — Cirt (talk) 01:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

## File:Ahmed Mohamed Clock by Irving PD.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ahmed Mohamed Clock by Irving PD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. - Cwobeel (talk) 23:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

I think you uploaded the original. I only thumbnailed it to the size of its use in the article. Upload history is wiped, though. --DHeyward (talk) 08:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

## MfD nomination of User:Dragons flight/test/Barack Obama

User:Dragons flight/test/Barack Obama, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dragons flight/test/Barack Obama and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dragons flight/test/Barack Obama during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

## File:GvDF Comparison.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GvDF Comparison.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

## ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

## What is the best way to cite your image in my thesis?

Hello! I am currently writing my thesis on Renewable Energy Resources. What is the best way to cite this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_Spectrum.png ? I would like to cite your paper(s) if they include the image. Weltanschaunng 02:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

## Question regarding Solar Spectrum

Hi, Dr. Rohde!

I am currently working on a project regarding the greenhouse effect, and came across your excellent [spectrum]. Specifically, I am referring to the 5250 °C blackbody curve. I am trying to plot something similar using the expression for solar exitance and converting to irradiance at earth by multiplying with the factor (Rs/d)^2, with Rs being the solar radius and d being the distance from the earth to the sun. Doing so however, I get a curve which is very similar but with a slightly smaller amplitude (peak amplitude in my graph is 1.4 but above 1.5 in yours).

I would greatly appreciate it if you could comment on my approach and/or elaborate a bit on yours.

Thanks! Alexandre Vandermonde (talk) 01:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Help me Admin! I want to participate in Wikipedia, and use my username. I can't log-in. A temporary password problem has prevented me from logging on while I make this edit to an Admin's Talk Page to ask for help. When I try to log-on at the temporary password page, i get an error. It tells me that I am either already logged-on or am using an expired or incorrect password. This is not correct. I think that you should also work on the error messages, to make trouble-shooting errors possible. Knowing what might have gone wrong is not useful to developers. There is a lack of a place to report technical problems. Assuming that all the code will always work is not up to the standard of what is possible with coding today. Please fix the log-on problem, I can’t do it myself. I want to participate in some form in the future, is there a course or short introduction to editing and writing available? In what order should I read the available resources? How much of the content on any help page is repetitious and duplicated on some or all help pages? What method for addressing technical errors on pages is in use? what prevents malicious code or social engineering?75.156.49.220 (talk) 02:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC) 2001:569:78D6:E600:E5D5:38FB:70BE:C549 (talk) 02:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

## AbuseFilter question

Hey Dragons flight, just wondering if you could answer a quick question about the AbuseFilter configuration. I'm going to propose enabling the block function, but I'd like to leave the rangeblock and degroup capabilities disabled while providing the block capability to only administrator edit filter managers, not non-admin EFMs. Is there a way to do this? Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

If I understand the code correctly, to edit any filter you need to the user right "abusefilter-modify". In addition, to apply an abuse filter "restricted action" you need the user right "abusefilter-modify-restricted". By default the restricted actions are "block", "degroup", "blockautopromote", and "rangeblock". The restricted user right is needed to add or remove the restricted actions as well as to edit any filter that has it applied. Given this understanding, I believe that if you give the "abusefilter-modify-restricted" right to admins then only administrator EFMs would be able to use the block function. One would separately need to enable the block function which is currently disabled on enwiki.
Blocks would come from a user with the name Mediawiki:abusefilter-blocker with the log message Mediawiki:abusefilter-blockreason including filter description and number as parameters (currently the filter number, parameter $2, is not used). According to my reading of the code, if a block is generated, the message Mediawiki:abusefilter-blocked-display is displayed to the blocked user with parameters for filter description and filter number. Assuming the blocking filter is also set to show a warning, the user should also see the associated warning message which can be customized in the normal way. I should note that I haven't tested these features, and this is just my understanding of the code, so I may be mistaken in some way. Dragons flight (talk) 11:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC) That's really helpful, thank you. You mentioned that the block function is disabled here; how would we enable it, and could we disable the degroup, blockautopromote, and rangeblock functions so that they don't become available when admins are given modify-restricted? Also, MediaWiki:Abusefilter-blocker seem to have been changed to "Edit filter" but there's no User:Edit filter or User:Edit Filter. I suspect this change shouldn't have been made since User:Abuse Filter does exist. Sam Walton (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC) At present, "blockautopromote" is available by default. "Block", "degroup", and "rangeblock" are not available by default. Though available, no one can use the "blockautopromote" function since no one has the required abusefilter-modify-restricted permission. So to add the block option and no others, one would have to add the "block" option and remove the "blockautopromote" option. I think one would need to add the following to the enwiki section of [10]: $wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['abusefilter-modify-restricted'] = true;
$wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions[] = 'block';$wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions = array_diff( \$wgAbuseFilterAvailableActions, array( 'blockautopromote' ) );

It appears that before issuing a block the AbuseFilter actually creates the account for MediaWiki:Abusefilter-blocker if it doesn't exist (or in fact seizes control of it, if it does exist). So it shouldn't be a problem what name is used. Though it creates the account, I don't think it creates or modifies any of the pages associated with the account, so someone would need to create an appropriate user page, etc. Dragons flight (talk) 13:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Ok, great. Could you double check that the list of changes I've written here is everything we'd need to do? And last question - do you know what happens if a user has 'abusefilter-modify-restricted' but not 'abusefilter-modify' as would be the case for administrators without the EFM userright? Sam Walton (talk) 13:40, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
That looks correct to me. I'm pretty sure that someone with "modify-restricted" but not "modify" would be unable to edit any filters. Dragons flight (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

If you research the history of the term you might find the word "lede" originated with a "journalist" who couldnt spell lead or a typo that stuck probably as a joke " keep the lead out of the lede " I understand Wikipedia accepts it...thats the point...Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia not a tabloid newspaper. 05:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)66.169.95.50 (talk)

## A barnstar for you!

 The Barnstar of Good Humor Get off Wikipedia and come spend time with your wife. Ccarlst (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

## Lisa Christine Holmberg page

Hi, Dragons flight! I was wondering if you would help me since you're an admin. I've been a victim of Overzealous deletion on my article Lisa Christine Holmberg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Christine_Holmberg The page has been completely revamped since its last deletion in 2014, and I feel like it got speedy deleted without a fair review with the new citations and information. Is there something that you can do or any advice you have? Thanks.(WikiConqueror (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC))

Hi Robert,

I think that the defenders of the free market against green alarmism seem to ignore your copyright here. I don't see clear attribution. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 11:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

## In the news candidate: Peabody Bankruptcy

I'm requesting your opinion on my nomination of Peabody Bankruptcy for main page in the news. Since you are interested in global warming related articles I thought you might be interested in this nomination. Thank you. Brian Everlasting (talk) 07:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

## Formula to convert inches to gallons for oil furnace

Hello, Dragons flight. You have new messages at Joseph A. Spadaro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

## Numerical recipes for fixed point convergence

If you just iterate the function, then near the fixed point you are dealing with approximately a linear transform of the deviation w.r.t. the fixed point. This means that components of the eigenvectors with eigenvalues close to zero will vanish rapidly, after a while you're then left with a vector that lies approximately in a subspace spanned by eigenvectors with relatively large eigenvalues (close to 1). You can then easily estimate how this linear transform acts using Gram Schmidt orthogonalization. Near the fixed point we have:

${\displaystyle f(x)=x^{*}+A(x-x^{*})}$

So, if you iterate this k times and subtract ${\displaystyle f(x)}$ then ${\displaystyle x^{*}}$ drops out and you are dealing with vectors that can be assumed to be in a subspace spanned by eigenvectors close to 1. If you perform a Gram Schmidt orthogonalization using a few of these vectors and then expand subsequent differences of iterates in the basis, you obtain the dominant eigenvalues (many eigenvalues close to each other will appear as a single eigenvalue). Then you're done because you now have access to both A and f(x), e.g. the difference between ${\displaystyle f(x)}$ and ${\displaystyle Ax}$ is ${\displaystyle (1-A)x^{*}}$, so you can then make big step forward by computing ${\displaystyle x^{*}}$. Note that applying the inverse of 1-A is easy as you know the (approximate) eigenvectors and eigenvalues. Count Iblis (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

This can be made more systematic as follows. You have to deal with the likely case of a large number of eigenvectors with large eigenvalues, many of which make a subdominant contribution to the initial vector. If you then eliminate the most dominant ones you're going to be left with the next dominant one which you need to eliminate via Gram -Schmidt again. So, what you end up with is a scheme were you iterate the function a number of times, extract approximate eigenvalues ${\displaystyle \lambda _{i}}$ and eigenvectors ${\displaystyle \left|v_{i}\right\rangle }$ and then construct another function with the same fixed point ${\displaystyle f^{\text{new}}}$ that has the eigenvalues of these eigenvectors reduced to approximately zero. In Dirac notation we can write:

${\displaystyle \left|f^{\text{new}}(x)\right\rangle =\sum _{i}{\frac {\left|v_{i}\right\rangle \left\langle v_{i}\right|}{1-\lambda _{i}}}\left[\left|f^{\text{old}}(x)\right\rangle -\lambda _{i}\left|x\right\rangle \right]+\left[1-\sum _{i}\left|v_{i}\right\rangle \left\langle v_{i}\right|\right]\left|f^{\text{old}}(x)\right\rangle }$

Count Iblis (talk) 16:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

## Title disambig text

Is there a reason {{Title disambig text}} doesn't use {{PAGENAME}} as default with {{{1|{{PAGENAME}}}}} instead of {{{1}}}? I was expecting it but don't know whether it conflicts with current uses of the template. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't know. I created the template based on a third-party request ages ago. I'm not sure I've ever even used it for anything myself, so I'm really not sure how it is presently used or if setting PAGENAME as a default would cause things to break. Dragons flight (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
OK. I don't want to mess with the template but have added it to the documentation.[11] PrimeHunter (talk) 13:23, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

## Help me

To SIGN a post, you add ~~~~ to the end of your post and it automatically creates a signature when you save. The tilde character (~) is usually found on the upper left of your keyboard. Dragons flight (talk) 11:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
oh! I got it now I will sign my post. ThanksSilent Hunter (talk) 13:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
This user is blocked, as a sockpuppet of Sarojupreti.—Constanstin 16:34, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

## 5 Million Year temperature graph

Hello, I saw your temperature graph at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Five_Myr_Climate_Change.png . Since the Earth experiences such large variations in temperatures, it makes sense to consider that our trend towards global warming is inevitable. It seems as if we've been in a temperature dip, and maybe we're just climbing out of it at a faster rate than we might have (at worse), but in any event a global temperature increase is just part of Earth's cycles.

That's a possible interpretation of your graph, is it not?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mschwage (talkcontribs) 02:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

## 400 years of Sunspot Observations

Hello DragonFlight,

what exactly is the meaning of the black smooth line in File:Sunspot_Numbers.png, how did you compute it? To me, it is not obvious, and I cannot find an explanation of it anywhere. Did I miss something? (I plan to plot a new solar activity graph for Commons, similar to yours, but based on new V2 ISSN and group data (yearly means) as distributed by SILSO.) I'd appreciate your hint, regards

--DeWikiMan (talk) 13:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

## Abuse filter

Hi, because of an irritating AbuseFilter bug, we (Kaldari, MusikAnimal and I) are going to do an update next week that will affect one of your filters. We hope we'll fix all affected filters ourselves, but we're of course grateful if you want to help us. The issue is explained here; the current plan is here. In any case, we wanted you to be aware what's happening, and you're very welcome to help out of course. I'm sending you an email with more details. /Johan (WMF) (talk) 13:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

## Earthquake magnitude

See talk page.--Japs 88 (talk) 08:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

## Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite nothing

Template:Cite nothing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

## Extended confirmed protection

 Hello, Dragons flight. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy. Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas. In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions: Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort. A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard. Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)