Hi. When you recently edited Westminster Abbey Burials and Memorials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Duke of Edinburgh
Hi Ds1994. I want to alert you that I have made some further comments on Talk:Duke of Edinburgh. I do appreciate your interest, and the reference you supplied looks like a helpful one also. Best, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 03:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Styling and Birth Dates
Hi, I have reviewing on the Royal Family articles, and Surtsicna (user) seems to be getting out of her way and consistently editing on styles and birth dates as to it should not be, since names are potentially announced on days of weeks after a birth of a royal, in which point it shouldn't be as this is retroactive. Styling is from date of birth onwards as is with the name, though announced on a later date as UK law states in can be done up to 42 days. It is just a pointless discussion, hope you can assist on trying to make this stop, thanks :) Pseud 14 (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Prince George_of_Cambridge#Title". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 04:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)