User talk:Duncan MacCall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Speedy deletion of Lapse (medical)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Lapse (medical) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CultureDrone (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

In fact I didn't mean to create that page at all, I only wanted to give someone searching for the medical, not legal, sense of the word, a link to the page Slip (treatment), in case they didn't know the word "slip" in this meaning themselves, but obviously I'll have to find out how yet. Duncan MacCall (talk) 21:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk:History of the Scottish National Party#Claims of Spying[edit]

Yes, I meant "If someone believes that this is not an NPOV claim." Thanks for helping me clarify my meaning. I often need to copy-edit my own comments. I pay attention to what I write when I'm working on an article and then I let out a stream of consciousness when I post to discussion portions. In any case, that article needs a lot of work. I added all but one citation in that small section. I know many of the claims are true (I study the SNP,) but the article needs some tweaking. Thanks again for asking for clarification. Ollie Garkey (talk) 11:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)