|This is Morningstar1814's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Morningstar1814.|
|This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.|
- 1 The Signpost: 18 August 2016
- 2 The Signpost: 06 September 2016
- 3 The Signpost: 29 September 2016
- 4 Rodrigo Duterte as a CE
- 5 The Signpost: 14 October 2016
- 6 The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- 7 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 8 The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- 9 Regarding Template:Knights Templar
- 10 The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- 11 The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- 12 The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- 13 The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- 14 The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- 15 The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- 16 The Signpost: 15 July 2017
- 17 Alik Sakharov
The Signpost: 18 August 2016
- News and notes: Focus on India—WikiConference produces new apps; state government adopts free licenses
- Special report: Engaging diverse communities to profile women of Antarctica
- In the media: The ugly, the bad, the playful, and the promising
- Featured content: Simply the best ... from the last two weeks
- Traffic report: Olympic views
- Technology report: User script report (January–July 2016, part 2)
- Arbitration report: The Michael Hardy case
The Signpost: 06 September 2016
- Special report: Olympics readership depended on language
- WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia
- Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between
- Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit
- Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them
- Recent research: One study encounters critique of its ethics from Wikipedians; another critiques the ethics employed by Wikipedia
The Signpost: 29 September 2016
- News and notes: Case study of Wikimedia Education Program published; remembrance of departed colleague Ray Saintonge (Eclecticology)
- In the media: This edition's roundup of media coverage
- Featured content: Three weeks in the land of featured content
- Arbitration report: Arbcom looking for new checkusers and oversight appointees while another case opens
- Traffic report: From Gene Wilder to JonBenét: Four weeks of traffic
- Technology report: Category sorting and template parameters
Rodrigo Duterte as a CE
I think the IP removed the important part "The statement is met with outrage among Jewish communities in the United States". The exact quote from the source is: "His comments triggered shock and anger among Jewish groups in the United States, which could add to pressure on the U.S. government to take a tougher line with the Philippines leader". - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Knowledgekid87: Even with the IP's remarkable insistence and generally difficult attitude, I still believe this statement is of very limited significance in itself. Duterte has, in the past, made a huge amount of controversial statements, frequently met with public outcries, to me this is just one of them - pure political posturing. The report fails WP:DEPTH, and will almost certainly fail WP:PERSISTENCE (even the fact that the US might exert further pressure remains a speculation at this point - note "COULD"). Having been at Portal:Current events for a while and seeing similar statements from Duterte being removed for the same reason, I frankly do not see why this particular one should stay. Consider the possibility of filing it to WP:ITN/C and think about the responses it might get - that should be a testimony to its significance. Morningstar1814 (talk) 22:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2016
- News and notes: Fundraising, flora and fauna
- Discussion report: Cultivating leadership: Wikimedia Foundation seeks input
- Technology report: Upcoming tech projects for 2017
- Traffic report: Debates and escapes
- Recent research: A 2011 study resurfaces in a media report
- Featured content: Variety is the spice of life
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- In the media: Washington Post continues in-depth Wikipedia coverage
- Wikicup: Winners announced
- Discussion report: What's on your tech wishlist for the coming year?
- Featured content: Cream of the crop
- Technology report: New guideline for technical collaboration; citation templates now flag open access content
- Arbitration report: Recapping October's activities
- Traffic report: Un-presidential politics
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- Special report: Taking stock of the Good Article backlog
- News and notes: Arbitration Committee elections commence
- Traffic report: President-elect Trump
- Featured content: Featured mix
Regarding Template:Knights Templar
Hi there. Thank you for addressing your concerns:
- 'I was under the impression that the papacy and its ecclesiastical jurisdiction would not use the flag of a sovereign state; it turns out I was wrong, so this should be of no issue.'
The Flagcon is of the Holy See. The Flagcon is of Portugal. These two hold jurisdictions as aforementioned. Not a problem at all.
- 'However, the flags remain inappropriate. We're seeing two unsightly flags out of nowhere, unexplained (WP:WORDPRECEDENCE),
This part is irrelevant as to you it may be unsightly and to others it may be sightly it depends on the individual opinion. When entering a discussion on information, neutrality and unbiased representation is extremely important.
- 'You might have also noticed that flags aren't often used in this sort of sidebars. '
- 'Plus, does the expression " Order of Christ (1319)'
suggest that the modern flag was used in 1319? Has it always been used since 1319? The same can be said for the other case.'
The order exists and used at anytime the current flag can be used,obviously not for holding crusades against jihads or any fantasy fiction but for outstanding military merits within it's respective placings.
As stated in (WP:WORDPRECEDENCE)
'-Political issues Beware of political pitfalls, and listen to concerns raised by other editors. Some flags are (sometimes or always) political statements and can associate a person with their political significance, sometimes misleadingly. In other cases, a flag may have limited and highly specific official uses, and an application outside that context can have political (e.g. nationalist or anti-nationalist) implications.
Flags change, and sometimes the geographical or political area(s) to which a flag applies may also change.
-Avoid flag icons in infoboxes
Administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes.
-Accompany flags with country names
The infobox may contain the national flag icon of an athlete who competes in competitions where national flags are commonly used as REPRESENTATIONS of sporting nationality in a given sport.
Flag icons may be relevant in some subject areas, where the subject actually represents that country, government, or nationality – such as military units, government officials, or national sports teams. In lists or tables, flag icons may be relevant when such representation of different subjects is pertinent to the purpose of the list or table itself.'
- 'I suggest we simply drop the flags altogether - or adding "papacy" and "Portugal" after said orders, rather than representing them through simplistic icons.'
As the Flagcon visualizes the nation by 'Portugal' and 'Holy See' via text it addresses this issue.
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on Wikimedia's 2016
- Special report: German Wikipedia ArbCom implodes amid revelation of member's far-right political role
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
- Recent research: Female Wikipedians aren't more likely to edit women biographies; Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- In focus: WMF strategy consultant brings background in crisis reputation management; Team behind popular WMF software put "on pause"
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- From the editors: Signpost status: On reserve power, Help wanted!
- News and notes: Global Elections
- Arbitration report: Cases closed in the Pacific and with Magioladitis
- Featured content: Three months in the land of the featured
- In the media: Did Wikipedia just assume Garfield's gender?
- Recent research: Wikipedia bot wars capture the imagination of the popular press
- Technology report: Tech news catch-up
- Traffic report: Film on Top: Sampling the weekly top 10
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)
- In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
- Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
- Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues
- Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth
- Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all
The Signpost: 15 July 2017
- News and notes: French chapter woes, new affiliates and more WMF team changes
- Featured content: Spectacular animals, Pine Trees screens, and more
- In the media: Concern about access and fairness, Foundation expenditures, and relationship to real-world politics and commerce
- Recent research: The chilling effect of surveillance on Wikipedia readers
- Gallery: A mix of patterns
- Humour: The infobox game
- Traffic report: Film, television and Internet phenomena reign with some room left over for America's birthday
- Technology report: New features in development; more breaking changes for scripts
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 3 wrap-up
My name is Alik Sakharov. Thank you for your contribution to the Wikipedia's page that describes the Early Life portion about myself.
Unfortunately, some information in the Early Life portion is quite inaccurate. In the description it states the following: "At the age of six, Sakharov and his family moved to Moscow, where he studied philology and philosophy at Moscow State University. In 1981, two months before graduation, Sakahrov was allowed to emigrate to the United States, eventually settling in Forest Hills, Queens in New York City. He worked as a watchmaker for three years."
Please note: the accurate information is that my family moved to Moscow when I was 8. Please also note that: the accurate information is that I never studied at Moscow State University as a formal student. This information was wrongly translated and interpreted from an interview (in Russian) some two decades ago. In this wrong and inaccurate form this information appeared in print, and then on internet. For the sake of being true and accurate, and for the sake of stating no misinformation, I ask that you please remove the Moscow State University reference.
Another bit, which is widely misunderstood is that being born in Tashkent, a capital of the Uzbek Republic of the former USSR, is quite different from what is now called Uzbekistan. To a former national of the Soviet Union there's a huge difference when one says/states in writing he was born in Uzbekistan. This is wrong. The correct, truly accurate form of statement is: he was born in Tashkent, former USSR (which is what it really and truly was at the time of my birth and until the formal fall of the Soviet Union, or more simply, USSR).
And lastly, please correct the spelling of my last name in the second sentence of the quoted text, where the name is spelled as Sakahrov, but should be spelled as Sakharov.
Thank you so very much for attention, Morningstar1814, I hope you will be kind to edit the addressed corrections above.
With much respect,
AlikSakharov (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Alik Sakharov (Director/Cinematographer)