User talk:Dwaipayanc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pwbsac[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Pwbsac has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015[edit]

Fixing Chak De! India[edit]

Hi Dwai! Hope all is going well with you. I just cleaned up Chak De! India which hasn't had a formal review since the GAN in 2009. I've put in a request for a copy edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests#August_2015

I'm hoping to slowly over time build it to an FAC. I'm actually pretty busy at the moment - but when I saw the state the article was in, I just had a marathon clean up. It should take them about a month or two to get to the article so there is time to fix areas.

I fully deleted one section because every single link is out of date - which is Box Office. I know that film articles have to have a "box office" section to get through GAN and FAC's - I'm wondering if you would have time to help me with this section. I found one current link http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=IN&id=chakdeindia.htm

And have pasted the text as it was before I removed it below. I'm actually going offline for a few days but I'll check in on the Weekend or next week. If you don't have the time to get through cleaning up this section - do you know anyone who will? And if you have other feedback that would be great - though no obligation to work on the article. As I said I am going to be coming and going anyway. Here is the old info:


(from infobox) | budget = 240 million (US$3.6 million)[1] | gross = 1.05 billion (US$16 million)[2]

Box office[edit]

Upon release, the film recorded a below average opening in India. This lower-than-expected occupancy level was an outcome of its limited release in various territories including West Bengal.[3] However, due to the strong critical response the film received, collections increased with the final outcome of over 80% occupancy for the weekend. Subsequently, Chak De! India was granted tax exemptions by the state of Bihar (which reduced tickets prices).[4] The film's box office collections increased and it eventually grossed 220 million (US$3.3 million) in its first week.[5] By the end of its theatrical run, Chak De! India became the third highest grossing film of 2007 in India, with revenues of 676.9 million (US$10 million) domestically.[6] Box Office India declared it a "Blockbuster."[6]

Chak De! India opened at number 20 in the US, number 11 in the UK, and number 12 in Australia.[7] It earned a total of 35 million (US$530,000) in the United Kingdom, 45 million (US$680,000) in North America, and 35 million (US$530,000) from the remaining overseas proceeds.[8]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Waiting for a winning formula". Business Standard. 13 August 2007. Retrieved 2011-07-07. 
  2. ^ "Top Lifetime Grossers Worldwide (IND Rs)". BOI. Retrieved 2011-07-09. [dead link]
  3. ^ "Waiting for a winning formula". Business Standard. 13 August 2007. Retrieved 2011-07-07. 
  4. ^ "'Chak De' tax free in Bihar". The Hindu. 31 August 2007. Retrieved 31 March 2012. 
  5. ^ "Top First Week Earners". Box office India. Retrieved 28 March 2012. [dead link]
  6. ^ a b "Box Office 2007". Box Office India. Retrieved 2008-04-07. [dead link]
  7. ^ "Box Office Overseas". Chak De! India. Indiafm.com. Retrieved 2008-04-07. 
  8. ^ "Overseas Earnings (Figures in Ind Rs)". Box Office India. Retrieved 2008-04-07. [dead link]

-Classicfilms (talk) 18:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I just found another reference which is currently in the SRK article -- not entirely certain about the source but will share here:
- Top Lifetime Grossers Worldwide (IND Rs)
Chak De's stats are listed at #23
-Classicfilms (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015[edit]

Pather Panchali[edit]

Congrats on getting it featured today. Its a great article and hopefully will bring even more public interest to the film.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 00:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

It's a wonderful article Dwai, exceptionally well-researched. Kudos to you.-Classicfilms (talk) 13:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015[edit]