Orphaned non-free media (File:GammageCupCoverScholasticEdition2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:GammageCupCoverScholasticEdition2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:54, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
A pie for you!
|Thanks for your efforts to improve The Gammage Cup. Though I haven't listed the article for GA at this time, I hope you'll continue work on it and consider renominating again in the future--your work is appreciated. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 02:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)|
- Can you point me to where these explanations are ? I reverted your edit because it removed content and replaced it with rather less, without any edit summary of explanation. To then say in an edit summary "please be more careful when reverting" is disingenuous to say the least. Please provide edit summaries for all edits and ensure that those summaries clearly demonstrate what you are doing. Thank you. Velella Velella Talk 19:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry if I was being rude with the reversion but you removed a significant amount of work using rollback in conjunction with huggle when you reverted the edit. Please look on the article history page to see my most recent edit summaries, etc. which I have added. If you have an issue with the page or the direction I am taking it in, please open a discussion on the article's talk page. I will try to be more explanatory with my edit summaries in the future. Thank you. Eatmark (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Eatmark
|Hi Eatmark, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article The Gammage Cup. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)|
|Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the copy edit you requested for The Gammage Cup at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)|
Hi Eatmark- I am trying to find reviewers for a Featured List nomination through the Numismatic portal membership list. If you have the time to look at the proposed list, feedback or comments (either positive, negative, or both) would be appreciated. Thanks-Godot13 (talk) 04:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)