User talk:EclecticEnnui

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Fast Five Scores[edit]

Hi there, I would like to ask about the scores for Fast Five. All were composed by Brian Tyler and were used in the movie, where should I put it? I have link for references. Anyway, nice to meet you!

Hi there, thanks for adding it under music part! Michael Teh (talk) 07:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)


Hello EclecticEnnui, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Epeefleche (talk) 06:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:Films considered the greatest ever[edit]

First of all. Welcome to Wikipedia. Second Wikipedia has an guideline saying that IMDb is not an reliable source. I don't remember where it is but when I do I will show you. IMDb can be used as External Links though. Third, I never had an problem with comparing Rotten Tomatoes ratings. I even put that The Incredibles is the highest reviewed superhero movie ever in Rotten Tomatoes so far. But that was removed by somebody who thinks that #1 movies on lists can only be used. So if that was true than the Dark Knight's ratings on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't sufficient. Maybe for the Rotten Tomatoes thing you can discuss this at the talk page of the article. If you need any other help on Wikipedia just let me know Jhenderson777 (talk) 16:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

You might want to check out this discussion Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films#IMDb not an reliable source. Jhenderson777 (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I read the discussion, MOS:FILM#Critical_response, some of Wikipedia_talk:Citing_IMDb, and at least some of other pages linked, so I think I understand. IMDb has demographic skewering, so that's not good, but I still don't understand how top 50 and 250 lists involve vote stacking. As I said, they're "picked by regular voters, who aren't publicly or privately known in order to protect from fixed voting." I'm not gonna use it, though. Rotten Tomatoes is fine, according to MOS:FILM#Critical_response. Am I right, overall? EclecticEnnui (talk) 19:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

weasel words[edit]

You can start off by looking at these 54 million references --- -- pls don't tag-bomb the lede again. You know the answer. Or you can start reading the first million or two of that url. It is not controversial that it has been called that by some, and there is no requirement to characterize all 54 million in the lede.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Obviously, but Wikipedia doesn't like weasel words, so that's why I thought it was relevant. I never said anything about controversy. Anyway, the lede is currently being changed back and forth, so I'm not gonna add it again.--EclecticEnnui (talk) 07:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
I agree about weasel words. I think there is a balance here, because wp also doesn't like the lede to be too encumbered. Anyway, I see your point about the myriad back and forth revisions. It does make it hard to move forward, doesn't it. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually, no. Those events are happening everywhere :( -- Bojan  Talk  06:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

The Human Centipede (First Sequence) is currently a featured article candidate[edit]

Hi there, thanks for all the helpful edits you have contributed to The Human Centipede article, I thought I'd let you know that the article is currently a featured article candidate!

At the moment I'm trying my best to make positive changes to the article based upon the comments and suggestions on the article review, but any help with this would really be appreciated. The featured article review is here and if you have any spare time it would be really cool if you could have a look at the comments and help make sure the article is meeting the standards that are asked of a featured article. Plus if there's anything you think you can do to help improve the article, or anything important that it's missing, please do go ahead and make the changes!

Thanks for all your help with the article. cya Coolug (talk) 19:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey there again, a quick heads up - firstly you may have seen that eventually this article passed! Woo! It has been suggested by some editors that the article is placed on the main page this year on Halloween as it is one of the few FA class horror film articles on Wikipedia. There is a discussion about whether or not this is a good idea at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests - any thoughts at all would be very much appreciated. It would be cool to hear your thoughts. cya! Coolug (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Vague tagging[edit]

Re: "The awards section needs to be updated, so I added a template message." – While you're right that the section needed updating, please use more specific cleanup tags. {{Cleanup-remainder}} is far too vague to be a useful indicator of an awards section needing to be updated; its principal use is for generally bad prose with so many problems that it needs to be overhauled entirely and obviously. See Category:Cleanup templates for a lot of other, more specific options. {{Update|awards|date=September 2010}} or {{Out of date|section|date=September 2011}} would have been more useful. More templates for time and date stuff are in Category:Time and date maintenance templates and Category:Temporal templates. Hope this helps. :-) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 14:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, those should help. Thanks.--EclecticEnnui (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on receiving the Dr. Heiter Award![edit]

For your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence) I present you with the Dr. Heiter Award. "Feed!"

Hi there, thank you for your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence). When the article was first started in October 2009 is was but a tiny stub that was immediately tagged for deletion, but thanks to the efforts of wikipedia editors that tiny acorn has grown into a great oak tree of an article. The Human Centipede (First Sequence) is now a Featured Article and on the 17th June 2010 the article received its 1,000,000th page view! The article routinely receives over five thousand views a day and is in the top 1,000 most viewed Wikipedia articles!

On Halloween 2011, the article was the Main Page Featured Article!

The Dr. Heiter Award was created to reward editors who have made positive contributions to the article. It can be presented by any wikipedia user to anyone who has helped the article grow. This might be by adding new content, fixing any errors or reverting vandalism.

Thanks! Feed! Coolug (talk) 17:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of films considered the best for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Thank you, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Foodfight! without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 03:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Metallica: Through the Never may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the Never'' will make its world premiere at the [[2013 Toronto International Film Festival]].<ref>{{citeweb|url=|title=Metallica

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Shawn in Montreal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mongrel Media without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you are going to blank content, please use the edit summary to at least explain why, or discuss on the Talk page Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Invitation: WikiProject Autism[edit]

Greetings! You are hereby invited to WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of autism, Asperger syndrome, and Autistic culture on Wikipedia. As the project emphasizes contribution from autistic editors, it is especially interested in you, who have chosen to list yourself as a Wikipedian with Asperger syndrome. Muffinator (talk) 03:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

invincible,,,,,,,,,,Michael jackson[edit]

hi I was interested in changing the intro of Michael Jackson invincible to,,,,,,,,,,"was his final album",, then on the next sentence put "it was his 10th studio album", however I have run into some opposition,can you help? do you have a minute to respond to the request above. thank you-- (talk) 10:01, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Changes in film director article[edit]

I was interested to see your changes in the movie examples in the film director article. It was sometimes hard to choose whether to their most artistically acclaimed film or their most popular film. Thanks for your contributionsOnBeyondZebrax (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome.--EclecticEnnui (talk) 23:11, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Jian Ghomeshi[edit]

The established consensus, under WP:ELNO #10, is that Facebook and Twitter aren't appropriate for listing as external links because the reader has to actually log into the site, and actively "like" or "follow" the pages, to actually see all the content posted to them — but not everybody on the internet is actually a member of either site, and not everybody necessarily wants to actively "endorse" the topic just to get a little bit more information. The fact that they're "verified" and "official" profiles isn't really the point, because it isn't actually our job to provide a comprehensive directory of all verified/official social media profiles in the first place or to help people increase their number of social media followers — rather, a site is normally only appropriate for listing as an external link if its content can be viewed freely, without condition or membership requirements, by all people who click on it.

If you disagree with that, you're certainly free to raise an alternate proposal for discussion at Wikipedia talk:External links, but it's a longstanding consensus and I don't think it would be particularly easy to come up with a new argument in favour of inclusion that hasn't already been considered in the past. Bearcat (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

You don't have to be a member of Facebook or Twitter to see the content. Right now, I'm not logged into either site and I can see what Jian has posted, like this. Are you saying that since you may not see everything that he's posted, because he (probably) has that control, that these sites aren't allowed to be listed?--EclecticEnnui (talk) 22:15, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

5 Flights Up[edit]

You recently just moved the article to 5 Flights Up (film) because of an article of the same name about a band. Do you have that link? Because I'm not finding anything like that on Wikipedia. LADY LOTUSTALK 01:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes.--EclecticEnnui (talk) 02:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Ah! Thanks :) LADY LOTUSTALK 12:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome.--EclecticEnnui (talk) 12:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Film Award[edit]

Filmbarnstar.png The WikiProject Film Award
I, Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk), hereby award EclecticEnnui the WikiProject Film Award for his tireless contributions to the List of films with a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and the List of films with a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Awarded 19:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, EclecticEnnui. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of The Cinema Snob episodes, contributed colours that may cause accessibility problems for users with certain types of visual disabilities. We aim to use colours that meet the WCAG AAA standard for accessibility. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines on this subject, which can be found at WP:COLOR; this page provides further information about contributing AAA-compliant colours to this encyclopedia. For information specific to templates used in articles about television, please also see Template talk:Infobox television season/Archive 3. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian? 23:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

List of The Cinema Snob episodes[edit]

There are four missing DVD-exclusive episodes from 2014 that Brad counts as episodes of the show, meaning that all of the episode numbers from around the middle of Series 8 onwards are incorrect (for example, the 300th episode "Heaven's Gate (Part 1)" is listed as 296 in the article) - Lordsunkel (talk) 16:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)