User talk:Editor2020

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
399 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Seven Heavens (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2,336 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Ancient Rome (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
2,378 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Kabbalah (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,138 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Septuagint (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
130 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Great Apostasy (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
489 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Soft power (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
22 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Hermetism and other religions (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
13 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA LGBT clergy in Judaism (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
183 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Messiah in Judaism (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
1,951 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Trinity (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
2,993 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Religion (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
630 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Diplomacy (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
166 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Hmong customs and culture (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
156 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bible prophecy (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
560 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Halakha (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
78 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Folk healer (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
653 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Who is a Jew? (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
765 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Haredi Judaism (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
12 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ceremonial pole (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
1,976 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C King James Version (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
668 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Hermes Trismegistus (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
3 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Freethought Festival (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
16 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Consumer identity (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
5 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Alissa Thomas-Newborn (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Saint Jonas' Festival (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
13 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Grammatical construction (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Network probability matrix (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
21 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lake Mariout (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Blackpool Reform Jewish Congregation (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
60 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Fergus Anckorn (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Rearrangement of Christmas[edit]

Hello,

Thanks for content rearrangement of the Christmas.

However, do you feel posting the para (The celebratory customs associated in...) just before etymology is the most appropriate thing?

--Muzammil (talk) 05:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Would you prefer somewhere else? I feel that it should remain in the wp:Lead section, as the Lead is supposed to be a brief summary of the article. Editor2020, Talk 05:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Dis you notice...[edit]

Dis you notice that you spoiled a link in the article Eugenics? The link does not work any more. ––Nikolas Ojala (talk) 03:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, self-revert time.Editor2020, Talk 03:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Tetragrammaton in the New Testament[edit]

Hello my esteemed Editor2020, thank for your good work in wikipedia. In the article Tetragrammaton in the New Testament you edited the 12 March 2016 valuable information was lost. It's too easy delete text rather investigating and repairing. The lack of information erased by You detracts basis for the theory of the existence of the Tetragrammaton in the New Testament, so let me expose why that should be restored. Firstly I agree in edit 1, so a get a new source. Your second edit here there is not any reword. Continuing with your third edition here this is not a off topic information due it expose treatment to the Divine Name when the gospels were written and before. Following this edition this is not a original research, a added the sources. Here is not a off topic information, according scholars like G. Gertoux the christian and jews give different treatment to the Tetragrammaton, the use of Κύριος throughout to represent the tetragrammaton has been called "a distinguishing mark for any Christian LXX manuscript" although it lack source, of course exist, so so I will add three. This text enriches about tetragrammaton. This information is not a off topic, it could be used to support the theory of existence of Tetragrammaton in gospel of Mattew and the Epistole. Thank for this, this and this correcction. Here not a off topic. Probably that gospel are not a translation, rather a version of the hebrew gospel, so this is not a exacly a translation.

AbimaelLevid (talk) 20:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Please feel free to restore any relevant, non-Original Research information for which you have reliable sources. Editor2020, Talk 00:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Criticism of the Bible has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Criticism of the Bible, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Masih ad-Dajjal[edit]

Thanks for clarifying that unparseable passage. MrDemeanour (talk) 08:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Jews for Jesus[edit]

You reverted my suggested revision to the lead sentence. I hope you read my remark on the talk page, as follows: "I changed the lead sentence. I have tried countless times on the Talk Page to get feedback from editors on this suggested change, and nobody is responding, so I've gone ahead with this change." I had the following dialogue on the Jews for Jesus Talk Page. Please read through this. As I say, I have gone through all the steps that Wikpedia asks for when someone like me has a COFI, but no editors have responded until you reverted. I think my rationale is sound and would like my revision reinstated. Here is my previous conversation:

I would like to suggest an edit to the lead sentence for this article. Regarding the use of the term "convert," I am not alone in my reluctance to use this term. Messianicmatt (talk) 21:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)The following website gives this advice about talking with Jewish people about Jesus: "'Convert' implies leaving behind one’s Jewishness. It is better to speak about 'becoming a believer (or follower) of Jesus.' But it is appropriate to explain that biblical conversion was spoken of by the prophets as meaning “turning back to God” rather than “changing one’s religion” (see Isa. 44:22; Jer. 4:1; 24:7; Joel 2:12).[3] Here's a similar thought from another website: "Many Jews don’t like to be called converts since they already believed in God, and in their religious observances, they were already responding to that part of the Word of God in the Tanakh, or what we call the Old Testament. When we recognize the Messiah and enter His Church, we fulfill or complete our Old Testament Faith. But we do not lose our ethnicity, who we are."[4]

Here's my suggested lead sentence: "Jews for Jesus is a non-profit organization founded in 1973 which seeks to share its belief that Jesus is the promised Messiah of the Jewish people."Messianicmatt (talk) 18:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

The article is directed at ordinary users of English. I appreciate that you dislike the word "convert", it is bad for your image, and you avoid it in your own material. However it is the ordinary English word for what the organisation seeks to do. Your PR needs are irrelevant here. Maproom (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC) Maproom I understand that the readers are ordinary users of English. However, this is not about our "image," nor is it about our "PR needs," as you put it, which I find offensive. We don't "convert" anyone. We share the message, our belief that Jesus is the Messiah. Then it's between the person and God as to what they do with it. And it is not just Jews for Jesus who avoids the word "convert." As you can see from the other websites I cited, there is a common understanding among many Christians that "convert" implies that a Jewish person stops being Jewish. So among the "ordinary users of English" in Christian circles (which encompasses a large portion of the general population), the word "convert" is not used when referring to Jewish believers in Jesus. I would appreciate getting feedback from other editors on this point. Messianicmatt (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

dmsedra I'm new to Wikipedia, so apologies if I'm doing this wrong. However, I agree with Maproom in that the word "convert" seems appropriate. While Judaism is the precursor to and has many close ties to Christianity, they are distinct religions today. They may be closer than say Buddhism and Judaism, but are not different sects of the same religion like Salafi and Wahabi Islam. Thus, I think that in standard usage today, "convert" would be appropriate. Dmsedra (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Jump up ^ http://www.equip.org/article/how-to-share-the-gospel-with-your-jewish-friends/ Jump up ^ http://www.hebrewcatholic.net/are-jewish-converts-still-jewish/ Jump up ^ http://www.equip.org/article/how-to-share-the-gospel-with-your-jewish-friends/ Jump up ^ http://www.hebrewcatholic.net/are-jewish-converts-still-jewish/

Article: Taboo[edit]

Dear sir / madam,

On 12 December 2015, you reverted an edit I made three days before. Could you explain to me why? I explained why I made the edit on the talk page. Basically, an incredibly strong statement was completely unsourced, which I think is irresponsible and against Wikipedia's rules.

Yours,

An anonymous contributor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.150 (talk) 21:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

P.S. I refrained from editing again as I do not want to cause a so-called "edit war". I want this to be solved in a civil manner. But I do think the article as it stands now is unreliable, and moreover irresponsible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.150 (talk) 21:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Please make any well-referenced, grammatically-correct, well explained changes you would like to. Editor2020, Talk 23:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
You are correct, all of the provided refs are about brother-sister marriage. I have reverted. Editor2020, Talk 23:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.150 (talk) 00:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

not a reference[edit]

Why isn't that a reference? (Ref to illustration of Samaritan script is available at ...) PraeceptorIP (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

See WP:REF. Editor2020, Talk 00:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for having my back...[edit]

Iris cat.jpg

... on Gap Creationism. I'm a bit disappointed that your revert was necessary, but thank you for making it.

Kirkpete (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Christian denominations may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Czech and Slovak Orthodox Church]] (one of the Slavic Orthodox Churches]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Are you watching[edit]

Yahweh and Moses? I'm afraid I've got no time to fix all the problems introduced recently. Doug Weller talk 14:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm one of the watchmen of the true GOD, YAHWEH and you don't have all the truths that I know since I been watching Man and angel alike since the beginning, how can you have part truth n some lies when spoke upon of the Holy Michael, unless you a watcher for Lucifer, by the end of days is here n you all will find out the full truth Mikael9779 (talk) 14:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Well how nice for you. Editor2020 (talk) 00:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Old testament is Christian text[edit]

To be a christian means to follow Christ. Christ was a Jew and the histories and stories of the old testament are all relevant in the Christian religion.

If I used the Koran or the Torah, I would understand your view. Old Testament are often taught in Christian Churches. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysticalresearch (talkcontribs) 19:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Editor2020 (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject Gnosticism[edit]

Hello Editior2020, The reason why you are receiving this message/invite because I hope you might have some interest in possibly help contribute to Gnostic articles via support the creation of Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Gnosticism (2nd nomination). I know you edit Christian/biblical related articles, that's why you are receiving this message. I would like your input on my proposed Wikiproject. Thank you & Cheers! — JudeccaXIII (talk) 02:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Red links[edit]

Hi -- you reverted one of my edits with the edit comment "redlink". Red links are not inherently bad: please see WP:REDLINK. -- The Anome (talk) 08:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Millerism edit[edit]

Could you visit Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_May_30#Millerisms and post your opinion on how the redirects and hatnotes should be handled? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Messianic Judaism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Torah|oral law]] observance varies, but most deem these traditions subservient to the written Torah). Certain additional doctrines, including those on sin and atonement and on faith and works, are

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Oriental studies[edit]

Please see my explanation on Category talk:Asian studies. --Quest for Truth (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

"Born again" edit[edit]

Just a quick note to say that I feel you were a bit quick on the draw to remove the paragraph I retained/reinserted in "Born Again" after a roll-back. I merely retained the possibly acceptable part of a recent edit by Dscotus44 and added citation needed templates. Perhaps the original editor should should be allowed a day or two of grace to supply what was missing? Anyway thanks for your editing in general, it is an impressive and constructive contribution to Wikipedia. — Jpacobb (talk) 20:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

All right then, we'll give it a while. Editor2020 (talk) 20:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Crossed wires![edit]

Hi Editor2020: Please withdraw your recent nomination as you have "jumped the gun" and have missed the bigger picture going on here, see my entry: IGNORE THIS NOMINATION, See: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 June 21#Category:11th-century BC Hebrew people: SEE Proposal renaming Category:11th-century BC Hebrew people to Category:11th-century BCE Hebrew people :Nominator's rationale: I started this one, but the entire series from "10th-century..." and onwards, see examples: :Category:10th-century BC Judaism etc, etc, etc, need to be changed from "BC" to BCE" since this is about Judaism that does not believe in Jesus hence the choice of "BC" needs to read as "BCE" as per the article Common Era. Thanks IZAK (talk) 16:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Withdrew my nomination until the Category reorg is straightened out. Editor2020 (talk) 20:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
@Editor2020: Thanks, much appreciated. IZAK (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you.[edit]

That single line on Tengri was aggravating me to no end. Thanks for cleaning it up.142.105.159.60 (talk) 22:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Antisemitism categories[edit]

I would like to know your rationale for removing two categories for the article Conspiracy theories in the Arab world‎. Jason from nyc (talk) 12:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Not all conspiracy theories involve Zionism or the Jews. Editor2020 (talk) 23:20, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
But if you feel the categories need to be included, please do so. Editor2020 (talk) 23:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Actually your reasoning is good; the conspiracy theories aren't categorically antisemitic, etc. I often remove categories on that basis. Perhaps if someone else feels strongly, they'll argue their case. Jason from nyc (talk) 01:57, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hallucinogenic Fish WP Tag[edit]

Hi :) I saw you removed the WP Altered States of Consciousness Banner from the Hallucinogenic Fish article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hallucinogenic_fish&oldid=prev&diff=733065782. Our scope includes methods of inducing altered states of consciousness and the article contains descriptions of strong visual hallucinations when the fish is eaten, therefore I added it. Meerpirat (talk) 09:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct. as you can see I immediately reverted myself.Editor2020 (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't see that.:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meerpirat (talkcontribs) 10:45, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Faith vs Trust[edit]

Good evening,

I see you reverted my edit to the definition of Faith.

Can you please contact me and let's discuss the merits of our differences so we can develop a improved concept to publish?

The concepts of faith and trust are foundational to so many other concepts. It seems worth the effort to get this definition right.

Thanks for your reply. Schwandtb (talk) 05:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for replying - I agree that the entry attempts to define too many aspects of "faith".

I will locate appropriate references for my entries.

It looks like I also need some guidance on how to properly make entries and also how I can communicate offline with other editors to discuss proposed revisions before I post them.

Can you help me with this?

Thanks! Schwandtb (talk) 16:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for your appreciation of my edits to Folk religion/Folk Judaism. You made my day! Manytexts (talk) 10:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Teilhard de Chardin[edit]

You removed the quote by Dennett. Do you feel it duplicates the Rose quote? I think that having two such quotes is important to establish general consensus in the evobiol field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NPalgan2 (talkcontribs) 16:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

No, please keep it.Editor2020 (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Atonement contribution[edit]

173.206.68.125 (talk) 03:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

My contribution empowers readers & provides neutral, verifiable, vital-to-full-understanding info. It is extremely relevant to learn Atonement is not supported by original Scripture or the LXX or the Vulgate. I will take this further if we can't resolve things.