User talk:Editor760

Work In Progress.

Meow!

--UM

United Massachusetts (talk) 01:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Man! --Happy Thanksgiving! -Editor760 (talk) 14:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 06:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians prepared for the Nuclear Holocaust has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians prepared for the Nuclear Holocaust, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^{T go beyond} 17:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2018

it's my page Chickenhero (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)chickenhero

User Talk Pages

Users can remove content from their own talk pages, per: User Talk Page Guidelines. Just an FYI.. --Wikipelli ^Talk 14:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

My bad. I see that one of the items that User:Chickenhero deleted was a speedy tag. Those cannot be deleted. Good catch. --Wikipelli ^Talk 15:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

I just came here to mention the same thing, but I'm curious as to why your notifying him of the deletion nom of GL5 Active Protection System when there is no deletion tag on that page? - ^theWOLFchild 16:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

I was just looking at the page up for deletion, and I was wondering to same thing. And, thanks for the heads up about talk pages. Also, which deletion template should I use? -- -The one, the only, Editor760 (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

You could check with The Mighty Glen, I think he tagged it last time. - ^theWOLFchild 18:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your reverts to User talk:Chickenhero

As frustrating and irritating as other users can be towards others, I just wanted to leave you a message to let you know that it's perfectly acceptable for editors and users to remove or blank messages from their own talk pages. On the other hand, leaving uncivil responses and personal attacks in their place certainly is not (as this is what this user is definitely doing). If the user removing the messages left by others, and even if they're going as far as replacing those messages with uncivil replies - it's always best not to revert those edits, as it will only antagonize the user and give them more reasons to be uncivil - not less so. A specific example where things can be made worse by reverting one's talk page is your reversion here, where you undid the page blanking but also restored uncivil messages and personal attacks that were added earlier - which now makes the problem that much more complicated and worse. In cases where users are doing this simply to be disruptive or troll, those reverts simply feed them exactly what they want - something we don't want to do ;-). Instead, just report the user to AIV or ANI so an administrator can step in - don't revert their talk page back and restore messages from other editors that they removed. Just wanted to let you know. Anyways, thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Yup. This was cleared up in the above post. Thanks for the info though. -- -The one, the only, Editor760 (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Ah, cool deal. Sorry for duplicating what someone already just told you :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Eh, doesn't really bother me.