User talk:Elan Morin Tedronai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked[edit]

As you have continued to violate WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE after being unblocked, I have reluctantly blocked you again indefinitely. For those following along, the two violations I saw were here, copying content without attribution, and here, inappropriately using a copyrighted image without specifying a fair-use exemption (indeed, no fair-use exemption would likely be acceptable there). --Yamla (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:: Oh, please, Yamla! I didn't know it was so serious! I didn't know the policy fully about the pictures. I think a contributor put an attribution on The Wheel of Time. I put on the summary. I thought it was enough. I didn't know that on I couldn't put images or multiply them on other articles. Really. Please don't block me for life. I am all doing in good faith. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

This does nothing to convince me we could unblock you now and be sure you wouldn't continue to violate WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. You've been warned over and over again. You knew your violations placed the entire project in jeopardy. You assured us you had learnt and would never again cause problems. So, we unblocked you and you basically immediately resumed your violations. Now, you need to somehow convince a reviewing admin that this time is different. This time, when you say you fully understand our policies, you really do. The bar will be much higher this time. I sincerely hope you can be unblocked, but I no longer have any faith in your ability to abide by WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. Any admin is free to lift the block if they are sufficiently convinced. --Yamla (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please don't block me again for life. I thought it was enough of attribution in the Edit summary that I was criticized so much for. I also thought that using pictures on multiple articles was also good. Always. But now, never. I'll be more careful in the future but at least I expanded The Wheel of Time with good additional info. In fact through the Fandom could be supported articles like Draft:Midkemia and Draft:Kelewan. It was just an example and person put an attribution but it was honest mistake. I would put myself, but he was quicker than me. Please don't block me for this. It was honest mistake, but all was in good faith. I still think that the Space Western would be good with the examples, albeit without the photo of Han Solo. But don't block me for that. If I make a mistake, warn me, but don't block me again for life. I haven't made meaningful harm in any way. Say so and it won't happen again. I admit that I made mistake. Please don't block me for life. It happens too fast and my block is very merciless. I will never use other sources without attribution and will never use photos from other articles. Please don't block me so fast for life. I think I learnt from my mistakes. There are always ways I can contribute in the future. Please don't shut me out so fast. I never meant harm in my edits. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Opened Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Elan Morin Tedronai. MER-C 11:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MER-C: Oh, mate, there's no way I can defend myself to that. So swiftly and quickly I was reblocked that I can only capitalize on the need sometimes to copy information from one article to another or to move chunks from one to another. I can't find other explanation for the perceived jeopardy other than that I needed to move parts of articles into discographies and bibliographies in order to make them work. I'd never jeopardize otherwise or with vandalism Wikipedia. It's just how I had to handle the processes back then to create separate discographies and bibliographies of established musicians and writers Probably, I always knew I had to put attribution from one article to another, but many times I forgot. For which I'm to blame of course, but there's no other way to defend myself, practically. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please, lift out my account block and entitle me again to editing. I'll always cite resources for copyright reasons and will abide by Fair Use laws, and I won't make the same mistakes again. I understand why I was blocked, but in no way I will cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia and I have proven that I make useful contributions generally. I think, there are ways I can contribute further. Please unblock me, Reverend Admins. Regards:Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

Hi Elan Morin Tedronai, as this was unsuccessfully attempted before, there is sadly currently no way for you to prove this other than perhaps editing other Wikipedias and asking for reconsideration at least 6 months after today. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@ToBeFree: Oh, that's extremely harsh verdict. Then it's the most probable final verdict, since I will probably never, ever edit Wikipedia in my life after almost 17 thousand edits and in my view undeniable contributions during 20 years of service. But, OK. It's very hard and hurtful to hear that there's no way I can prove myself useful after 20 years doing my job and misreading or more most likely misinterpreting the rules. OK. I will likely never ever edit Wikipedia if I can't do it and I am denied requests and shut the door each and every way. Cardinally it's so. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) 22:22, 8 November 2021

Elan Morin Tedronai, that's not really what I said. I have attempted to provide an open door back here by pointing to the list of other Wikipedia languages and specifying a number of months after which asking again is feasible. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: No, man! You are great keyboardist and fine young lad, probably younger than me! But a block now, when I was merely asked to just make a polite careful unblock request, and to just deny me now and to postpone me for next year is likely a block forever! This disheartens me and discourages me from likely make another request, ever in my life! In Wheel of Time, yes, I added info from the Fandom, but look how big t grew?! Or historical fiction, space opera, military science fiction, list of space opera media and list of historical fiction by time period where I worked so hard and made so many compromises in the sake of the information and the evolution of the Portal! It's extremely disheartening, discouraging and deniable to shut me down and to even minimize my contributions! Alas, I didn't want it to end like this! I didn't expect to be treated so harshly by administrators! I'm extremely hurt that I'm thrown out and ousted of English Wikipedia when I think my contributions to the Portal are undeniable and when I think and I want and I fucking desire to edit and can to prove to contribute as I've always done these 20 years, but I can't and will never can! It's unbelievably hurtful that I can no longer click "Edit" and make the fucking musician, librarian best of me as always have done! Regards:Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

March 2022[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I hope that with this heartfelt plea I will be unblocked and allowed to edit Wikipedia as I have done it. I know I was told for 6 months, but it's been 5 months since October and I feel and think that it's enough? Please, don't block me for life. I learned from my mistakes. I will be very cautious and careful in editing, but probably I will not edit as much as I used to. I think I gave my best so far as I am 36 and I have been working for Wikipedia and Fandom: All Adult Life. I am distinguished editor and I think it'd be shameful if I remain blocked since I gave so much for Wikipedia so far. Please don't block me for Life. I will make constructive edits as I always have, but it hurts to be blocked for offenses instead of discussing with me. I hope that I will be able to redeem myself for my mistakes. I hope that Administrators would review my plea and unblock me. I am distinguished editor. I am librarian and pharmacist and I am educated man. I will never copy image from one page to another without citing resources. The same goes from moving Fandom to Wikipedia: Always, I have to cite the source. Please, don't shut down me for this. I didn't realize it was that serious. I will never make these mistakes again. Likewise, I will also use edit summaries with more respect and frequency, since it's necessary. Also, I would never vandalize Wikipedia in any way. With all due respect: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) (Chavdar Likov)

Decline reason:

Stale unblock request. You can make a new one if you want. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you contributed positively to any other wikis that you could point us to (as suggested by ToBeFree above)? As we've already assumed good faith once, and unblocked you only to have to quickly reblock you for the very same behavior, it would be helpful if you were able to demonstrate the ability to adhere to our policies. SQLQuery Me! 06:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Bulgarian Wikipedia. I'm Bulgarian and I have written some stuff for them. I also made here a translation on several historical fiction Bulgarian authors like Anton Donchev, Dimitar Mantov, Tsoncho Rodev and Stoyan Zagorchinov. Yes, apart from that: Bulgarian Wikipedia for sure. One can check me if you want, but my contributions are minor, alas. I hope to contribute more in the future. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) (Chavo)
There have been no edits from this account on bgwiki during the enwiki block; bg:Special:Contributions/Elan_Morin_Tedronai shows 61 edits, some of which weren't exactly welcomed ([1]), but that was in 2020. I currently have no opinion on unblocking, other than noting that an appearance of having ignored common and hopefully useful advice isn't exactly a good argument for unblocking. I can't judge whether my advice of editing other Wikipedias was actually helpful, but if it was, helpful advice was apparently ignored. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because I thought I was banned from editing all Wikipedias. Also, I consider my work on English Wikipedia: my main work. Considered and still consider it. My work on Dimitar Talev however were good, but I am for criticism, I guess: I should've spent some time on it as well. I have done other things as well beside Wikipedia and Fandom or moving material from Fandom to Wikipedia. No. It was never ignored, mate. I haven't done much on Bulgarian Wikipedia. I should have, but I didn't find time and sometimes I was deeply hurt that I was reblocked so quickly from English Wikipedia, that I thought that it was like permanent block from all Wikipedias. Really. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
Not having time and being (understandably) hurt is one thing, genuinely believing that the advice suggested you to do something forbidden is another. That, or misunderstanding my multiple explanation attempts. I was already surprised about this issue before ("that's not really what I said" above) and was left in deeper surprise when your response to the clarification was "no, man" and something about keyboarding. People were wondering how copyright can be so unclear that a reblock is necessary, now I'm wondering how my words could have been similarly unclear... I'm afraid writing any message here may be pointless as only the parts without actual information seem to be understood, which defeats the point of writing a message to convey information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I might've discredited myself or I could be doing it even now, when I am writing. @ToBeFree:: Probably I don't deserve to be unblocked, by your words in English Wikipedia as you put it. It's just that I thought that after 6 months: I can get a second chance? I was re-blocked so quickly and nobody discussed anything with me instead. In the meantime while I was blocked, I haven't made edits in Bulgarian Wikipedia. I might've been more involved. I am for criticism. But, I was among 10000 Wikipedians and I think I have contributed enough to justify my unblocking in English Wikipedia. "Infinity" is too much. Can't I be unblocked here in English Wikipedia considering my achievements and my overall contribution to the Project? I messed up copying from Fandom to Wikipedia without stating resources, but I won't do that mistake again. I won't move pictures like that, because I understood that it's 1 photo per article and not more. That was subsequently after I was re-blocked. Probably, it could've been discussed with me instead of re-blocking. I am not a sock-puppetter! I am not a vandalizer! Please! I have been involved with the source for 20 years! I even did work on Fandom back in 2005, when I was 19 as a personal favor to Jimbo Wales! Why I have to be blocked "infinitely"?! I have achievements! I have contributions! After 6 months: can't I be permitted back in the source?! Oh, I can't by your words! You are neutral! I am speechless! It'd be complete humiliation to deny my unblock request after 6 months during which I was blocked out of the English Wikipedia, when I stated that it's my main project! But go ahead: Reverend Administrator's decision. I won't make another Cardinal request probably, because I'll be heartbroken if I am denied again after 6 months. I have achievements. I have education. I understand my mistakes, I won't repeat them; but, please don't block me for life. Regards: Chavo Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
This is so weird. There's nothing about "deserving" to be unblocked, this is purely about demonstrating copyright and editing competence by working in a collaborative Wikimedia project – any of your choice –, practically with the only requirement of actually doing a measurable amount of work and not getting blocked for it there. The English Wikipedia has been the site for such an experiment already, and it failed; the (perhaps egoistical but practical) response is a skeptical request for trying to edit somewhere else before being unblocked here. It doesn't really matter what you did on the English Wikipedia before, as part of that will always be "having been blocked for copyright violations, having been unblocked, and having been blocked again". That's an achievement if you'd like to call it one; I'd rather focus on the current situation instead of looking at that not-so-bright past. If you had constructively edited on any other Wikimedia project during the block, your position for making this unblock request would be a much better one, and ours for unblocking would be a much easier one. And there's good news: You can still do this. You're blocked only on the English Wikipedia, so if you have a lot of free time to invest into Wikipedia, you can already do so, and we'd actually be happy to see this. And I personally will be more than happy to unblock then as well. This is not "for life" unless you're making it for life. I don't understand why you seem to do. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had to work in another Wikipedia in order to prove myself? Oh, I didn't read it in that case. I saw it as a "closed door" and didn't make edits in other Wikipedias. I also suffered several illnesses from covid-19 and wasn't so hard to prove myself in Bulgarian Wikipedia. And to be called "experimenter" is very offensive, @ToBeFree:. I was never trying to vandalize or experiment on Wikipedia. There is a "test"-page for this. I just didn't have time. I was sick throughout much of the year. English Wikipedia always was my main work. @SQL: asked if I have done some work? Yes. But minor. I have worked more here, but it's very offensive to be called "experimenter" and "vandal" when I never did in bad faith. OK. I am tired of this folkenticity. Whatever, Administrators say. I'll be heartbroken if I am at least not permitted to edit my User Page. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) EDIT: I admit, I haven't other Wikipedias due to health reasons, I am for criticism. During my downtime, I have had other activities and hadn't invested much into Bulgarian Wikipedia as English Wikipedia is my main work. I merely waited around 6 months and I am asking politely if I can be readmitted again in the most humane way. I am not a vandal or sock-puppetter and I am not trying to experiment on Wikipedia in any way. I have done much work before, I understand my mistakes, I won't repeat them again. May I be allowed to edit English Wikipedia again? Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
The word "vandal" appears a few times on this page, but only as misquotes, never as a word written by anyone else than yourself. The word "experiment" was inaccurate; what I meant is a "trial". Unblocking was tried/attempted, but it wasn't successful as it was followed by a reblock for the same reason as the original block. Issues don't necessarily magically disappear after six months of inactivity; if the blocking administrator had had an automatic unblock after 6 months in mind, they would have set the block to automatically expire after that duration. An indefinite block is "until the reason for the block is resolved", which is hard to prove without editing other Wikipedias during the block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I am sorry. I would try to contribute to Bulgarian Wikipedia and Kazakh Wikipedia since I speak the language, more in the future for sure. It's just that I was refraining myself from editing and was having downtime. I had to prove myself in other Wikipedias? OK. Sorry. I was lazy. Sorry. But as stated: English Wikipedia was my main work. I've had 17000 edits. I have stars. I am asking politely. I didn't think administrators have such issues with me. I wouldn't move material from one article to another without stating source as well as goes for Fandom to Wikipedia. I understand my mistakes. I hope that there's much more I can contribute in the future. I wouldn't copy photos from one article to another. I understood it. It's just that I was having a downtime and you said after 6 months to ask again. Well, I didn't invest much time, since I was sick from covid and have epilepsy, but I still think I was valuable contributor and can prove myself to be such in the future. I am asking politely again. It'd be sad if the "door is closed". I would invest more time in Bulgarian Wikipedia in the future. It's just that English Wikipedia is my main work. I sincerely hope to contribute more to all Wikipedia, in my spoken languages, including English Wikipedia, but please, readmit me, Reverend Administrators? 6 months passed. I really didn't work very much on Bulgarian Wikipedia (the issue on Dimitar Talev was closed and the article was embettered in reality, ToBeFree), but I always did it concurrently with my work on English Wikipedia. I hope you'll readmit me again. I won't copy material without stating sources. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) EDIT: I created David Eddings bibliography and Raymond E. Feist bibliography. Really, in no way I am going to do harm on Wikipedia. Many bibliographies, since I am qualified librarian. I know I overstepped the rules, but in no way I will har wikipedia. Also, Peter F. Hamilton bibliography. I did much work on science fictional space warfare and historical fiction in the past. In no way I am going to vandalize or scam over on Wikipedia. I know I cannot copy without resources and I cannot put photos like that. Please, readmit me in Wikipedia again. Chavo Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)
I hope, I will reinstated sooner, because I've been waiting whole month. I am not nagging. I know it takes time, but I hope that my request will be viewed in shorter timer. Please, if you are refusing me, do it outright. Really, this waiting is very hurtful of my heart and soul. I think I can contribute further. Especially on Embrace and The World of the Wheel, as putting references and making up the paragraphs. I will never not state resources and will not move pictures or photos again. I hope that I will be reinstated and reincluded in English Wikipedia. Please, don't decline my request and I hope to not wait anymore and be among the Wikipedians again as I think I can contribute in many ways further in the years. Chavo Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

June 2022[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am making a new request as NinjaRobotPirate recommended. More than 6 months have passed. The last one was stale. Unexplained to me: I guess people didn't want to "dabble" with me. I suppose also that administrators either are busy or are afraid that I'll be a failure. Virtually, I haven't edited much other Wikipedias. My work here is my main work. I hope I'd be reinstated again. I'll never copy information without citing resources and I won't move photos from page to page. For the last thing I hope I'll be excused: I didn't know it was that serious. More precisely: wasn't very familiar with that rule. Please, don't refuse me. I will always cite resources. Likewise, as said: I will try to use summaries more frequently. Due to my more than 15-years experience, I'd like to reassure that I won't make these same mistakes again, but I'll be more cautious and won't make like that many edits as before. I'll edit for sure, but I hope I won't be re-blocked (if unblocked) just for being absent? Probably not. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I cannot unblock you. You were unblocked before after being blocked for COPYVIO's and were promptly reblocked. You've not made any credible assurance of not continuing to COPYVIO and you have not edited other wiki's to show you can do so w/o getting blocked. (courtesy @Yamla:Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You forgot to show another language version of Wikipedia where you made a substantial number of edits without copyright and fair-use violations, as requested by ToBeFree. --Yamla (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, @Yamla: here on bg:Димитър Талев without any bickering. Well, there were some in the beginning, but people became comfortable with my vision. Also, I did some work on bg:Димитър Мантов, bg:Петър Бобев and bg:Цончо Родев: here and there. Not the most substantial ones (as stated English Wikipedia is/was my main job), but it counts I think. I also did translations of Dimitar Mantov, Tsoncho Rodev and Anton Donchev, but here on English Wikipedia. I mainly hold my work here as my main priority and thus haven't done much work elsewhere. I admit, I am for criticism: I should've paid more attention and do more. I hope I'll be readmitted again and the request won't stale. I'll never copy photos from one article to another and I will always state resources. Speaking of which, once unblocked (hopefully) I want to put some citations on The World of the Wheel as it covers written from Fandom. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

I see only three edits on bg.wikipedia in 2022, see here. Am I missing something? That's a very, very long way from "a substantial number of edits". --Yamla (talk) 20:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, no, @Yamla: you are right! Yes, I am perfectly for criticism: I haven't made substantial edits on other Wikipedias. I just thought that after 6 months (turned 9) passed and since English Wikipedia is my main job: I would be unblocked and will prove my worth here. Yes, I haven't done much for Bulgarian Wikipedia these years. I am for criticism, but please don't ironize me. I will prove my worth. I admit however that I've done quite a lot here and there's still things I can do in English Wikipedia, yes, without much work done on other Wikipedias (still, some work I have done). With no vandalizing of any kind, copyright problems and missed citations, I assure you. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

@Deepfriedokra:: OK. That's very hurtful. OK. I have no words. I thought I'd be unblocked if make a good unblock request, but... alas it didn't happen. OK. Is there a way, I might get unblocked in the future? Or, it doesn't matter. I won't be editing any Wikipedia, because it hurts my soul that I'm denied each request I made. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) EDIT: Oh, and @Deepfriedokra:: I haven't edited other Wikipedias "w/o getting blocked". I don't understand this "credible assurance": I've worked for 15 years without much problems and my contributions stand. It looks like you are venting your frustrations and taking it out your spite on me. But... OK. I admit and respect administrators' decision. I hope I will be unblocked one way or the other... in the coming years. But actually, let's ask @NinjaRobotPirate:? NinjaRobotPirate, it was a stale unblock request. You told me to make a new one. I made... and was denied again. They told me 6 months and to try again. But, alas: no, it won't happen. It's OK. I'll be fine. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk) ADD: It's humiliating. Really. Very humiliating. From @Yamla: to @Deepfriedokra:: it's incredibly sad and humiliating, you, people do this to me. Or not do anything at all. Asking in March: no, 3 months waiting and stale request. Asking in June: it's almost 2 months waiting and being denied again. Then it was from @ToBeFree:. I can't be trusted. I was here for 15 years. 17 more precisely. Even from the very beginning: 2001. I can't believe it, you are doing this to me, to deny when I am in the first 10,000 probably in number of edits and in my view, for myself: my contributions stand and are undeniable. OK. I won't crawl and beg to be permitted again. I just can't believe it that you are denying me. Tears. No words. Goodbye, Wikipedia. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

February 2023[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elan Morin Tedronai (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can I be radmited back to Wikipedia considering my contributions and achievements so far? I know I've made mistakes, but it's been 2 years almost and I hope that I can prove myself worthy and contributing. I think that there's more I can do and still more I can contribute here in English Wikipedia. I don't think I will get insta reblock like before as time has passed. I know I've made mistakes in copyright, resources and image right, but I don't think I will jeopardize my future staying. I will make casual constructive edits with edit summaries, but rarely as I have other projets in life. I just want to be able to edit like before, since I have done a lot and still can do but with more casual and careful approach, while realising and appologizing for my mistakes. I'm qualified librarian and even have (had) pending rights. Administrators can see that I have contributions and achievements. I know I haven't edited much other Wikipedias or in Bulgarian, but I have done some Fandom occasionally. Please, readmit me back, Dear Administrators in English Wikipedia, considering my achievements and contributions and probably for sheer goodness and good faith. My Work in English Wikipedia is one of my greatest personal achievements. I like to make substantial edits and have done a lot to the music artists, particular literary genres and overal literary and music topics (less philosophy, although I'm qualified). Please, readmit me back to English Wikipedia, Dear Administrators. There's still more I can prove. Regards: Elan Morin Tedronai (talk)

Decline reason:

In 2021, you were given instructions on how to be unblocked. Once again, you've refused to follow them and have made the same promises that you always do, including when you went right back to violating copyright and adding unsourced content. I think this is enough times you've been given the opportunity to show that you can follow instructions. If you can't follow the instructions given to you on this page, we have no assurance that you can follow Wikipedia's policies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Contributions with all the projecs I stood behind.
WThis user prefers to
make substantial edits to Wikipedia.
This user has been a Wikipedian since November 2001.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user is a member of
WikiProject The Kinks.
This user is a member of WikiProject Literature.
This user is one of the 10000 most active English Wikipedians of all time.
This editor is a Veteran Editor III and is entitled to display this Silver Editor Star.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Libraries.
exclThis editor is an exclusionist.
This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than 15 years.
darThis editor holds a darwikinist philosophy.
15,000+This user has made over 15,000 contributions to Wikipedia
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Email[edit]

I received an unsolicited email through the 'Email this user' function from this user requesting assistance to help unblock them. First, I am not an admin. There're limits to what I can do here. Second, there is a clear appeal path, in this case the Unblock Ticket Request System since your talk page access is also revoked. Third, the email did not address the underlying reasons of the block, which does not give me the confidence in advocating for you. Please do not email me on this matter further as there's nothing much that I can do to assist in unblocking anyone here. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 05:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The World of the Wheel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The World of the Wheel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The World of the Wheel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Z1720 (talk) 05:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]