User talk:Enix150

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Enix150, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Also, please remember to fill in an edit summary for any edits you make, as this helps other editors to know what changes you've made. Again, welcome!  Pyrospirit Shiny! 15:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to MAPKAP kinase-2, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 19:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Problems with upload of File:RCS-4 molecular structure.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RCS-4 molecular structure.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can use {{pd-chem}} to tag any chemical structure images, because they are ineligible for copyright. Also, in the future, please upload chemical structures as .png rather than .jpg, as .png is much better quality. Thanks, shoy (reactions) 13:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should I use the {{pd-chem}} tag at the bottom of the page like you did? or should I put it in the source where I had been leaving my sig? Is there an easy way to upload the image as a .png after having already uploaded it as a .jpg? I have a .png version which, you're right, does look alot nicer, but since the current version is "RCS-4 molecular structure.jpg" it won't let me rename it "RCS-4 molecular structure.png". Also it appears I uploaded this to both Wikipedia and Commons, is there an easy/speedy way to get rid of with wiki version to save up some space? Sorry for all the questions, and thanks for your help! Enix150 (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

License tagging for File:RCS-8 molecular structure.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RCS-8 molecular structure.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JWH-167[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JWH-167 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 01:05, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bk-MDA[edit]

Just a quick FYI, you should create the target page before creating redirects to it. --Dylan620 (tcr) 14:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Eric-1[edit]

I'm pretty much certain that whatever cecchem were selling as "Eric-1" was not Corey lactone 4-phenylbenzoate, despite what their website may say...this is a real compound, it is an intermediate in the synthesis of some prostaglandins, but there is nothing in either the scientific or patent literature that would indicate this compound or anything remotely similar in structure has any stimulant effect at all. The page should probably be deleted to remove this misinformation from the internet, just in case any trigger happy governments decide that Corey lactone 4-phenylbenzoate should be banned as a potential new drug of abuse (see for instance what happened with naphyrone on the basis of internet rumour and speculation)...would be a shame to see a pharmacologically inactive but commercially useful compound be banned because some Chinese RC manufacturer decided to use it as their fake name to relabel old stock of mephedrone as after it was made illegal!

It is debatable whether cecchem have actually come up with any novel compounds as they claim to have, though I think some samples of one of the early "Eric" compounds turned out when tested to in fact be the N,N-dimethyl analogue of mephedrone, which was novel at the time if hardly very creative. Eric-4 may possibly have been invented by cecchem, but more likely (given that it appeared in Sweden quite some time before it showed up anywhere else) it was a custom synthesis request from a Swedish manufacturer of synthetic cannabis blends which was then put on cecchem's general stock list after the customer continued to buy more of it. Meodipt (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Church of the Tree of Life listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Church of the Tree of Life. Since you had some involvement with the Church of the Tree of Life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Passargea (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SRT-1460 structure.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:SRT-1460 structure.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:MPPP[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:MPPP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Enix150 (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Pho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green onion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Threonine metabolism[edit]

Hello Enix150. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Threonine metabolism, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Does not redirect to a different or incorrect namespace. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exogamy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglophone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of CJC-1293[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article CJC-1293 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the general notability guideline. It has received only the briefest of mentions in one paper - I can't find any other information on google books or google scholar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 18:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liebermann reagent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Methylpropyltryptamine[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Methylpropyltryptamine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl inquire 01:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your request for undeletion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is CJC-1293. JohnCD (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of CJC-1293 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CJC-1293 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJC-1293 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Froehde reagent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to MDA, AMT, PMMA, Mace and PMA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panacea (medicine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linnean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Corynantheidine listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Corynantheidine. Since you had some involvement with the Corynantheidine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sydb (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cordyline australis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muttonbird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I want to take the reagent tables live - you're amazing. Testem (talk) 13:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Enix150. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Enix150. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Telugu, Tollywood and Globish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Enix150. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Smenospongia echina moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Smenospongia echina, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering(t) 13:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Arecibo message. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 12:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of portmanteaus[edit]

My apologies, but I had to undo changes to this article that included yours. This was unintentional, as your edits looked legitimate, but in order to undo a bunch of other stuff the tool made me include yours as well. Please feel free to re-add them! DP76764 (Talk) 14:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 491 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bo Andersson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Project Penguin" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Project Penguin. Since you had some involvement with the Project Penguin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Intervention episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to A&E
Steve Harvey's Funderdome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Thunderdome

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SF-6847 has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
SF-6847, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp [utc] 06:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Low, Roadster and Fugly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carrelame has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Carrelame, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- RoySmith (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chulukua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ursolic acid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page P38.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Fringer" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fringer. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 10#Fringer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bentonite
added a link pointing to Plasticity
Redmond, Utah
added a link pointing to Pink salt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phyllospadix scouleri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Observing Wikipedia's verifiability policy[edit]

Enix150, Wikipedia's policy requires that all content at Wikipedia be WP:Verifiable. Your additions at List of portmanteaus restored unsourced content previously reverted per policy. As these items did not contain a citation to a reliable source, they were reverted per policy, which states:

All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[2] the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.

Please either revert yourself, or add inline citations for the two items you added. The burden of proof is on the person adding content to an article to show that they are verifiable. The citations should have been added by the IPs who originally added the content, but since you have restored it, the burden is now on you. Please note that self-published sources like Wikipedia and Wiktionary cannot be used. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mathglot, citation added. Though I was under the impression that entries in disambiguation pages and List-Class articles didn't require citation if it is present in the linked article. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 01:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your impression seems like a reasonable one, and I wasn't sure if it was policy or not, as I could see it going either way. I checked around and it's not quite the case; here's what I found: WP:SOURCELIST, and WP:MINREF. My original revert of the IP was due to the fact that at least some of the IP's three items looked like compound words, not portmanteaus to me, so I thought they deserved a cite, to settle the question. (Probably a lot of other words on the page do, too; but it's a volunteer project, and someone else can deal with the rest.) Given my doubts and the removal, my reading of those two links is that the items should be cited. But it could be the case that some of the words don't require it, although maybe not for the reason you stated. The reason you gave could still be out there somewhere as guideline or policy, and if you find it, could you please ping me, and let me know? Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 02:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pigasus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nam kaeng hua chai thao
added a link pointing to Pepper
Tom som
added a link pointing to Thai

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Badr Brigade.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ref spamming[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ohnoitsjamie, hey mate, I don't believe I was spamming, though I can see why my repetitive edits might have been flagged as such. My additions stem from a debate over the List of portmanteaus wherein some users have questioned the etymologies of some of these portmanteaux and deleted them for not having citation specifically referring to their origin. I found a source that references many of these words as portmanteaus, so I was adding the citation to each word's appropriate article. If this was in error or there was something wrong with my formatting please let me know. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 04:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You were indeed spamming. Please also read WP:COI, which may apply here. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ohnoitsjamie, now I am very confused. Why would this be a conflict of interest? Can you please explain why you see this as spamming? Thanks! Enix150 (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please read WP:REFSPAM. I said that it may apply. In any case, SpinningSpark's comment below provides an additional rationale why we don't need the same reference plastered all over the place. Furthermore, that sources is questionable in terms of WP:RS and simply lists a bunch of portmanteaus, and isn't very useful anyway. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ohnoitsjamie, ok, thank you! Yes, that source is basically just a list of etymologies, which is why I thought it was perfect to cite these words officially as portmanteaux. The next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus though, I will point users toward this conversation. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If your concern was referencing the List of portmanteaus page then there was absolutely no need to shoehorn refs into dozens of other articles. I came here from the Telegraphy article where I thought that your insertion concerning cablegram was an unnecessary diversion of the flow of the article. We don't need etymological information everywhere a portmanteau or acronym is used. Maybe when the word is the article headword, but even then, only if we have something interestingly encyclopaedic to say about it. Otherwise, leave that sort of stuff to Wiktionary. SpinningSpark 17:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Spinningspark, thank you for your help. I will quote this next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Spinningspark, thank you for your help. I will quote this next time the debate comes up in List of portmanteaus. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Better to quote policy and guidelines rather than my opinion. WP:SAL says quite plainly Being articles, stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies, such as verifiability... which means, per WP:V, that referencing is required in the list article page itself. What other articles say and what references they contain does not matter, Wikipedia cannot reference itself. SpinningSpark 21:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cryptochrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photoreceptor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Starlite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PVA glue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Xfiles[edit]

The alien bounty hunters are also shapeshifters. 184.152.237.222 (talk) 08:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Colonists are now mentioned in the shapeshifting article. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 09:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PF-07321332, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pyrrolidone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Qult of Qirli" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Qult of Qirli and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 5#Qult of Qirli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Makavians" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Makavians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Makavians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pepe the Frog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Trumpanzee" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Trumpanzee and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 28#Trumpanzee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Trumpanzees" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Trumpanzees and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 28#Trumpanzees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schwagstock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluff.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saliha Mahmood-Ahmed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thermobaric weapon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foxhole.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of portmanteaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glamazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LSM-775, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Periphery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop adding bit part roles to Breaking Bad articles[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sufism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch[edit]

I notice you've been doing additions recently to the draft article for The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch. I found some more mainstream references you can use if you wish, as I don't have the time right now. nytimes.com, kutv.com, newsweek.com, ksl.com. None of these are currently being used as references and all mention the TV series. 5Q5| 14:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sufism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Ngwenya Mine, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:SEAOFBLUE and MOS:OVERLINK specifically. Country names should not be wikilinked, and we should try to avoid placing two links right next to one another, where they might be read as a single link. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 20:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]