User talk:Enormous-fart

Be nice

This is the correct place to contact me, but only leave a message if it's constructive!

Talkback

Hello, Enormous-fart. You have new messages at Murph9000's talk page.
Message added 07:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Murph9000 (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Goatsex seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Enormous-fart", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because of what it is. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Someone (not me, they spotted you independently) has flagged your username as possibly being offensive. Now, personally I'm not that bothered by it, but I have a fairly thick skin for that type of thing, and my opinion on it does not count. It all comes down to whether the admins decide that it is offensive or not. If you would be willing to change it, please reply to this message and indicate that, the admins should see that and act accordingly. They might even decide that it's not offensive and that would be the end of it. I can't predict how they will react to it. I'm giving you a fair opportunity to get out ahead of it. Leave any note or comments that you want the admins to consider here, on your talk page. Thanks. Murph9000 (talk) 07:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

• The username is offensive and the editing disruptive. Moreover, this is obviously not a new user, they're far too hip to the three-revert rule and the like. I've blocked the account. Please use your main account. Bishonen | talk 08:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC).

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Bishonen | talk 08:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

@Bishonen:

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enormous-fart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

TheAmazingTechie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

No, I am a new user but I have read the policies thouroughly in advance. This is my first and only account. As for my account being used "only for vandalism", please see my first two edits. I apologize for my immature conduct after that, and I will make sure it does not happen again.

Decline reason:

This is generally unconvincing. You read the policies thoroughly and then decided to act deliberately maliciously. In defense, you offer two trivial edits which weren't abusive. If this is the sort of behaviour we can expect from you, let's just let the indefinite block stand and everyone will be happier for it. Yamla (talk) 11:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

@Yamla:

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enormous-fart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

TheAmazingTechie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

It's NOT the kind of behavior you can expect from me in the future, and I wasn't suggesting that the two minor constructive edits justified the disruptive behavior; I was only trying to show that I do have the ability to be a benefit to Wikipedia. And that's the side I will continue to show if unblocked, there will be no more immature or disruptive behavior. I understand I broke the rules, I only ask that a reasonable expiry time be set rather than an indefinite block.

Decline reason:

I have to agree with Yamla. You deliberately and knowingly disrupted Wikipedia. The problem isn't that you cannot edit productively but that you obviously did not want to. I see no reason to believe you suddenly developed an interest in being a good-faith contributor after edits like this where you tried to game the system to have your vandalism stick. Huon (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2016 (UTC)