User talk:Enryonthecloud

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Enryonthecloud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Alexmar983 (talk) 09:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Begich Towers[edit]

Ringrazia User:Beeblebrox visto che te l'ha revisionata. E non si è nemmeno parato a criticare in talk. A me una volta per delle modifiche minime mi hanno revertato un intera aggiunta su Salò. parlo proprio robetta tipo un aggettivo di nazionalità con la minuscola... ci voleva a correggere meno tempo che annullarlo e venirmelo a sbattere in talk. Quando si incontra qualcuno che rifinisce e non si lamenta, bisogna ringraziarlo.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Una precisazione[edit]

Adesso che sei bello lanciato te lo dico: a me non fa troppo piacere stare su itwikipedia, quindi passo molto tempo da altre parti. Volevo dirti che in futuro se ti va puoi contattarmi qui.

Ho visto che hai già lavorato su enwiki e ti voglio garantire che è molto più "semplice" se non si ha il problema della lingua. Indubbiamente ha standard un po' più bassi ma per chi lavora sodo non è un problema. Anzitutto è più facile che chi sta col dito alzato a chiedere correzioni sia il primo a farle senza troppa pubblicità. Poi comportamenti passivo-aggressivi ci sono ma battono in ritirata anziché essere quasi "tutelati" a livello sistemico come se fossero una buona cosa. Da ultimo, portare le voci a una valutazione e all'attenzione di una comunità eterogenea è più facile. Per esempio c'è la rubrica "did you know" per le voci ampliate che è più agevole di quella italiana.

Quello che ti suggerisco quando vuoi ampliare un argomento X è di passare da enwiki. Avrai un riscontro più ricco (con altre fonti, altre sensibilità) ma soprattutto più paritetico e poi con calma puoi aspettare che qualcuno traduca su itwiki, a patto che non lo voglia fare tu. In quel caso ovviamente faresti la metà del lavoro ma in realtà il passaggio da enwiki si rivelerebbe ancora più "arricchente", quindi sarebbe un lavoro più profondo. Per esempio nel caso del Liberty a Torino se hai fortuna troveresti chi ti trova anche fonti in lingua inglese.

Pensaci, la cosa mi troverebbe molto più "esaltato" e "carico". Soprattutto valorizzerebbe più il tuo lavoro in tutto il mondo, e non è un'esagerazione.--Alexmar983 (talk) 04:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie, Alexmar983. Mi sei simpatico e ti tengo molto in considerazione per la tua competenza e l'equilibrio che dimostri sempre. Sì, ho creato alcune voci anche in inglese tempo fa e vorrei proseguire l'opera con altre. Effettivamente enWiki la trovo meno "noiosa" per certi versi e utenti un po' meno "spigolosi"... e forse più collaborativi. Tuttavia restiamo in contatto! Se vuoi puoi anche scrivermi alla mia mail personale: enrico.cabianca@gmail.com, dove potremo parlare più liberamente. Spero, poi, un giorno di poterci incontrare a Torino o dalle tue parti (Toscana? Lunigiana? Non ricordo...) per conoscerci meglio davanti a un buon bicchiere di vino. --Enryonthecloud (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enry vivo fuori dall'Italia, quando torno concentro tutto in pochi momenti altrimenti non ce la farei a seguire troppe cose. Per esempio questo a tre ore di treno da dove vivi. Quanto al contatto certo ci sentiamo con piacere. Una mail si manda da ovunque. Non escludo un giorno di tornare più su itwikipedia, sulla quale rimango attivo in parte, ma sai nel tempo libero penso sia meglio scegliere la strada di minima energia come strategia generale. In questo momento altre piattaforme sono più semplici, e non solo "per me", è proprio una constatazione basata su molte discussioni negli ultimi anni.---Alexmar983 (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Se ne fanno, a Torino ti segnalo questo.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK portale[edit]

Ho lasciato una richiesta sul DYK di home page ma puoi modificare intanto Portal:Italy/Did_you_know.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Monte Viso Tunnel at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Read the screen![edit]

Please read this. You have now done six uploads of File:ArnaldoRivera 02.jpg and other images of him and have failed to see that they are tagged for speedy deletion. I am dubious about whether you would be allowed to upload one image on a fair use basis. So: find images of the guy which are available under a {{cc-by-sa-4.0}} or compatible licence and upload them to the Commons. If you cannot find such images, then the article must go unillustrated. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DIOMEDE BRIDGE MAP.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:DIOMEDE BRIDGE MAP.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:E57C:E3A:C9A4:2E95 (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ArnaldoRivera 03.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ArnaldoRivera 03.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ArnaldoRivera 02.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ArnaldoRivera 02.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]