User talk:Erxnmedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Finding the cure for neurofibroma[edit]

People: Why am I the only one editing these topics? Has Wikipedia been completely deserted? Am I on a desert island or have I stumbled into the universe of The Road?

Thanks, Erxnmedia (talk) 22:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Neurofibromatosis book[edit]

I created an NF book and listed it in two places, I don't know if modifying one modifies theother but here are the locations:

Speedy deletion nomination of Richmond Research Institute[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Richmond Research Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GrapedApe (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

CIA activity forks[edit]

I ask you to stop edit warring over the CIA activities in (blank) articles. It looks like a mass AfD proposal is in order to settle the matter. I agree with @Volunteer Marek: on this one. Mnnlaxer (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, please start a formal AfD proposal to discuss. Erxnmedia (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on CIA activities in Albania. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

(and of course all the other articles).Volunteer Marek (talk) 21:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Volunteer Marek, it is you who are in the wrong in this edit war. Stop blanking and redirecting articles. There is a debate started. Contribute to that or leave the articles alone. Mnnlaxer (talk) 21:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

For your edits. If you would have some spare time, it might be good to create an article on CIA/American activities in Poland where they have engaged in kidnapping and torturing people.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Please feel free to branch this page and add details: CIA activities in Russia and Europe#Poland. Erxnmedia (talk) 18:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Edit war warning[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bevacizumab. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Get Motivated Seminar[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Get Motivated Seminar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about company of dubious notability. Even the website is a deadlink

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nthep (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)