User talk:Esrever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wiki Loves Pride![edit]

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

  • What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
  • When? June 2015
  • How can you help?
    1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
    2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
    3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.


Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

comment[edit]

Who are you anyway???? God??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.230.129.58 (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2015‎ (UTC)

About the Japanese Emperor Meiji's title in Order of the Garter[edit]

Dear Esrever, you shouldn't keep doing this, I came from Asia, and I educated in England, I knew how the Japanese titles works, and I knew how the British titles works, if you knew this, you will find the whole title of Emperor Meiji's page is called 'Emperor Meiji', why don't you change that? Stop reversing other's works, we have a lot job to do, not stuck on obvious matters. Thank you!

His or Her Honor[edit]

I was unclear on your reasoning for this revert [1] at Chief Justice of the United States: "just because they've all been male to this point doesn't mean they always will be". It seems to me that compressing "while that judge holds his or her office" to "while that judge holds office" is still gender neutral, perhaps better as gender agnostic, and certainly better as being more succinct. As for "this reference is not to any specific Chief Justice", the phrase "that judge" still clearly refers to "any judge", so I'm not sure where the phrase unduly specifies a particular judge. In any case, my earlier revert was prompted by ClueBot's false positive for vandalism, so I've left things as you left it, and leave you to reconsider the original edit [2] if you're so inclined. Cheers. Willondon (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Gosh, that was just poor reading comprehension on my part. I missed that you removed his, too--I thought you'd taken out just the or her. I agree that the "gender agnostic" language you've proposed works just fine. Esrever (klaT) 16:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

FY: Bolding of "Dame" and "Sir".[edit]

FYI : Contrary to what you believe, "Sir" and "Dame" are treated as part of a person's name and are bolded in the intro as per the MoS. Regards, Afterwriting (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Yep, you're right. I checked a couple of other articles this morning, but not the MoS. Esrever (klaT) 00:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

American Airlines don't worry[edit]

I would not worry about the American Airlines article as my edit today should calm your fears. I do not want to write that American Airlines started in 2013 after the USAirways takeover. I just wrote the accidents section and if I were trying to do what you feared, then the section would say "no crashes". But I didn't do that. So, rest easy. I mainly wanted some discussion about the direction of the article, which is coming in.

Good luck. Ensign Hapuna of the Royal Hawaiian Navy (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Great. These comments belong on the article's talk page, though. Esrever (klaT) 20:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2016[edit]

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

  1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
  2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
  3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

"The Dalton School"[edit]

If The New School can have "The" in the title, the same should apply to Dalton School which, currently incorrect, should include "The." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newyorkerguy (talkcontribs) 02:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Please don't fracture the discussion. It should continue on the appropriate article's talk page, not on my talk page. Esrever (klaT) 03:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)