User talk:Ethan111

May 2017

Hello. Your recent edit to April 28 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 10:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Ethan111, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ethan111! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cortez Belle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cortez Belle was changed by Ethan111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898473 on 2018-01-17T21:49:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chris Gunter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 22:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Transfers

Hello. Just to let you know that the only reliable source for a transfer being complete are the clubs concerned. The Daily Mirror and other websites are just guessing, hoping that they'll have the news first. So until Chelsea/Arsenal confirm the Giroud move to be complete, it isn't complete, and Wikipedia shouldn't claim it is. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexis Sánchez. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Particularly this -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 18:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mix Diskerud, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop. with edits like this -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 18:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Note that these warnings look to be frivolous. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to President of the United States— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)