User talk:Enthusiast01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Ewawer)
Jump to: navigation, search

Barnstar[edit]

In the fine Wikipedia tradition, I am happy to give you this barnstar to recognize all your hard work. TeaDrinker (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For a great deal of hard work to improve articles on a wide range of topics. TeaDrinker (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
Thanks for your work on the La Trobes or Latrobes. Nice to see the articles developing. Victuallers (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 09:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
Dear Ewawer, thank you for your great job in expanding the article I created about mixed bathing. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 04:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
Thanks for your awesome work on the Bikini article. I have been looking for a good copyeditor for so long now, that I find it hard to believe that the article finally has someone of you caliber to work on it. Aditya(talkcontribs) 13:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposals for a Palestinian state[edit]

Hey, would you like to help us with the lead section oft the article : Proposals for a Palestinian state ? Would be very nice. Thank you Miraclexix (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Can you please see the talk page? I have some issues with your edit. nableezy - 23:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

I have revised the heading of this section from We need your help! to Proposals for a Palestinian state, in harmony with WP:TPOC (Section headings). Miraclexix (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Team Barnstar.png The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you for the professional teamwork! Miraclexix (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Constitutional basis of taxation in Australia into Section 96 of the Constitution of Australia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. You were already advised back in January to start doing this. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you are having trouble understanding what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I see by your edit to Parliament of Tasmania you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Copying from one article another without providing the required attribution is a copyright violation. Please begin fulfilling this mandatory legal requirement. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Energy in Victoria (Australia) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Cabcharge Australia Ltd has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. Diannaa (talk) 22:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Enthusiast01 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

for reasons previously discussed Enthusiast01 (talk) 03:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I am unblocking your account, as this post shows you have a good understanding of copyright law and how it applies to Wikipedia editing; and this post demonstrates that you don't intend to use multiple accts to avoid scrutiny. Welcome back, and happy editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Enthusiast01, "for reasons previously discussed" is not going to be clear to those unaware of your block appeal before this one. Do you want me to link to it here to provide context? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do. Nice to see you are keeping an eye on me. Enthusiast01 (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, I have your talk page watchlisted. And like I stated, I know how hard it is to stop editing this site for good, no matter how much you want to.
Anyway, for those reviewing this matter, Enthusiast01 made a case for being unblocked in December 2016; see here and here. He was very close to being unblocked, as is clear by Diannaa's final response on the matter, but he was upset and left instead of taking the time to reply when given a clear opportunity for an unblock. It seems he needed some time to cool off, which is clearly why he's back now. If the reviewing administrator thinks this needs to go back to WP:AN, I'd be willing to set up another block review. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Flyer22, the usual course of action is to first contact the blocking admin, as they are typically contacted regardless. Also, no need for a big drama-rama, he has met the unblock conditions that I set out. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Wow, that was quick. Enthusiast01 (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Diannaa, the blocking administrator's opinion being important is why I pinged you above. As for a big drama-rama, I was thinking logically -- that the request might be declined, given the statements of others at WP:AN. In any case, if you feel that he has met the unblock conditions, there's nothing more to state. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
On a side note: Enthusiast01, you did pop into my head hours before your above unblock request. That's because, when scrolling my watchlist, this longtime editor caught my eye after using one of your favorite edit summaries: "Tidy." Anyway, I hope to see you editing well. Remember to keep sourcing (inline references) in mind. You know, more than you usually do. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IP address, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RIR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parliament of Western Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prorogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Mishna[edit]

Those were nice edits you made to the Mishna article today. Debresser (talk) 16:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parliaments of the Australian states and territories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preferential voting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Award, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Certificate and Token (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Coverture[edit]

Sorry I only saw your edits to that article now. At a minimum, they were added in the wrong place, since the article is about the Common-law legal systems. Similar institutions elsewhere should go in the "Analogous concepts outside the common law system" section. AnonMoos (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Roman Catholic Diocese of Sale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Patrick Phelan and Diocese of Limerick
Patrick Phelan (Bishop of Sale) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Victoria

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.

- MrX 22:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC) - MrX 22:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Be aware that Donald Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia is under a discretionary sanction that forbids editors from reinstating an edit which has been removed until consensus is reached. Your edit here violated that. Please be careful in the future. ~ Rob13Talk 03:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please remember to leave a edit summary when editing articles. I observed that one was not left when this edit was made.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Biased unethical editing in case of political topics[edit]

This user has selectively used opinions from newspapers that supported its anti-Trump bias in case of Comey-Trump relationship. But systematically deleted other user's additions TAKEN FROM THE SAME NEWSPAPER, that brought a different light to the topics. The user is not worthy of TRUTH-based Wikipedia. He should be banned for improper editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.88.146.1 (talk) 13:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

It is expected that such posts be signed. Whether it is from the same newspaper article or not, the material must be relevant to the subject matter of an article in which it is used. This article is about Comey's dismissal, not about disclosure of classified information or anything else. Your posts are not relevant to that end, as many other editors have obviously indicated. Stop trashing the article.

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution[edit]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Australian Security Intelligence Organisation you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia license. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Dismissal of James Comey[edit]

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know I have reverted your recent edit [1] on this article. I did not understand why these edits were made, as there were no reasons given in the edit summary. You deleted certain links, and cited source content, that is helpful to our readers. Also, using words like "however", to replace more direct and forward text that gets to the point seems unnecessary. No disrespect, I have appreciated many of your past edits, but if you wish to keep edits such as these, please at least provide an edit summary. Thanks, and keep up the good work. DN (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Fair enough. The first edit (replaced by However) was a duplicate statement relating to Comey wanting to maintain FBI independence from politics. The "however" part was a reference to not being able to achieve this in at least two cases. In relation to the second part of the edit: it was to remove a double link. Enthusiast01 (talk) 22:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)