User talk:Z = z² + c

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:F=q(E+v^B))
Jump to: navigation, search


I did not realize (until now) these edits: [1][2]. As much as I would like to contribute, these will clearly continue and defeats the point of further contributions. This is NOT "drama" or "attention-seeking": now leaving for solid sure for other people's well-being forever...

Feel free to go through: special:contributions/F=q(E+v^B) + special:contributions/z = z² + c and delete/revert EVERYTHING!!! Please do not talk about this or my previous account, not one letter, not on any page: "terminated" actually means it and I will not respond. Thanks. Farewell (again)...

z = + c 23:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Date: Sunday, July 23, 2017
Time: 10:21 (UTC/GMT)

Premeable (as of April 2012)

  1. "Rules" are pointed out to me every now and then. Here is the finest "rules" page ever written (and my favourite): Ignore all the rules!!!
  2. Should be able to answer within a couple of days unless I'm really busy or have no access to the internet at all (unlikley but it could happen...).
  3. If you leave a message here, I'll answer here.
  4. If I leave you a message, please answer there.
  5. Archives are done by year. Any bots which auto-archive things may be reverted.

Equations of motion on spirals[edit]

If you could add this topic to the article would be appreciated.-- (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Help Request[edit]

I've recently set up a mediawiki site, and am having trouble getting equations to appear correctly. for example I think it relates to I was googling for a solution and somehow??? came across your page. I was wondering if you would be willing to help me out. Also thought you might enjoy the idea of and be interested in contributing to the website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar for changes to Integration by Parts[edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is to thank you for your many excellent changes to integration by parts. A very important mathematical article is now bearable! Quietbritishjim (talk) 14:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

It's disappointing that a couple of reverts from (probably well-intentioned) editors who didn't understand the situation put you off from editing. It's clear that you're a valuable contributor. I hope that you just waited for the dust to settle and started contributed under a new, fresh account (if so, abandoning this account was the right thing to do). Either way, best wishes and good luck in the future. Quietbritishjim (talk) 14:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)