User talk:Faizan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Faizan Al-Badri)
Jump to: navigation, search
Crystal Clear Icons Apps Messenger.png
User Talk E-mail My part Toolbox Bookmarks Guestbook

Bhagat Singh - GOCE Edit[edit]

Hello Faizan: I am working on your GOCE request for a copy edit of the article on Bhagat Singh and have come across a sentence that does not make sense. In the Special Tribunal section: you/or someone wrote “…and to accept death of the persons giving evidence as a concession to the defence.” The meaning of this is unclear to me – can you explain? I will continue to work on the copy edit s time allows. Kind regards. Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for picking this article. There is a backlog at GOCE requests mostly. That text was not added by me. The Book that is being used after this text as reference is not available online, I am trying to access the reference somehow. Faizan (talk) 12:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Help needed[edit]

Plz check talk page of Paniala Ilyaskhorasani (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Baghat Singh Copy Edit[edit]

Faizan: I have now pretty much finished the copy edit of Baghat Singh and archived as many citations as possible. Along with my query of several days ago, I have some additional comments for your consideration.

In the “Assembly case” trial section it was not clear what the outcome of this trial was and what, if any defense, Singh offered. In the ” Hunger strike and Lahore conspiracy case” section it refers to Singh’s life sentence in the Assembly case. I have noted that he received a life sentence in the” Assembly case” section but this could use some elaboration.

There is no mention made of Singh’s defense, if any, in either the ” Hunger strike and Lahore conspiracy case” or the “Special Tribunal” section. This should be discussed. It is mentioned that they had no opportunity to defend themselves in the “Criticism of the tribunal trial section”. If that is the case then what they proposed as their defense in each case needs to be explained with a note that they were not allowed to present their arguments (if that was true in each case).

Please let me know what if any changes you make so that I can complete the c/e and advise the GOCE that i have done so.

Kind regards Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


I filed a DRN as Human 3015 was becoming increasingly nonsensical in his statements and making me laugh and he did not seem to get the point, anyway, it ought to be a simple open and shut case. Please give your input here. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015[edit]