User talk:Faizul Latif Chowdhury

Mr. Chowdhury, Thank you very for editing. Grateful if you can add refrences/citations. I have forgotten those. Also, some informaitn is licking iike Taskima Nasrin;s works in translation. Can you help? Noor Elahi

License tagging for Image:Keith Dowding.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Keith Dowding.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Akbar Ali Khan.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Akbar Ali Khan.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:M-n-roy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:M-n-roy.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Poet Jibanananda Das.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Poet Jibanananda Das.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 08:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amiya Chakrabarty

A tag has been placed on Amiya Chakrabarty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ekranoplan 21:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello

if you're the faizul latif chowdhury who used know a certain aditya kabir, please reply to my talk page. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 15:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Amiya Chakraborty.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Amiya Chakraborty.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Guy Verhofstadt.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Guy Verhofstadt.jpg.jpg. The copy called Image:Guy Verhofstadt.jpg.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 19:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and welcome

Hello Mr. Chowdhury, welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you are interested in Bangladesh related topics. So am I. I see you contributed significantly to the Bhasani article. Thanks for that. Please note to maintain the quality standard of wikipedia all additions to the article should be cited. So, if possible please provide the references for your additions. Also please spend some time to understand the image copyright principles of wikipedia. Your talk page seems to be flooded with a lot of image related issues. I personally have changed the copyright description of the Bhasani image that you added. Let's work together on the Bhasani article to turn it into a complete and good article. Arman ^(Talk) 04:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cover Ka.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover Ka.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hossain Zillur Rahman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hossain Zillur Rahman.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Painting-Banalata-Sen.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Painting-Banalata-Sen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Selim-Al-Deen--2001.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Selim-Al-Deen--2001.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iffat Ara

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Iffat Ara, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.thedailystar.net/starinsight/2007/02/01/she.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Chowdhury, the article is still a copyvio. Don't remove tag until you change/remove the copyvio text. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 12:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fake Stamp

The stamp from here is a PhotoStamp, which ANYONE in the USA can make with their OWN photos. Jitu Osmani is making a false claim that the US Post office has released this stamp. This is a stamp sold at double the face value ($16.95 instead of $8.20 for 20 stamps of 41 cent value). Here are some other photostamps. You can tryout creating a stamp with your own photo here.

This guy somehow fooled the Bangladeshi newspapers, but again, the US Govt has released NO stamps on this occasion. Here are the list of official 2008 US stamps]. --Ragib (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Iffat Ara 2006.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Iffat Ara 2006.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

totallydisputed tag on Ziaur Rahman biography

You added the {{totallydisputed}} tag at Ziaur Rahman, without citing any reason for doing so at the article talk page. Please provide your justification of the tag at the article talk page. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 22:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:United States of Europe.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:United States of Europe.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is from the public domain. And nothing more than a book cover. There is no point in deleting a book cover. Other versions may be easily produced and used.

Actually, book covers are NOT in the public domain, unless specified clearly. If you find an image in the Internet, it does not become public domain automatically. Book covers are copyrighted, and you can only use those under very strict fair-use conditions. --Ragib (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Clinton Seely 2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Clinton Seely 2006.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested Professor Clinton B. Seely for a photograph and he will send one as soon as he can. The photo I have uploaded is from a public domain and there is no indicaiton that it is copy-righted. There is no indication that copying and using this photo for Wikipedia constitutes violaiton of any copyright. Hence the use is fair.

Mr. Chowdhury, I am afraid you are confusing Public domain with content found in the Internet. The photo referenced above is from http://salc.uchicago.edu/seelypic.jpg , then how do you claim to be in public domain? In the context of copyrights, photos are in the public domain when their copyrights expire. Unless it is clearly stated that the author of the photo has released it in public domain, you cannot claim it to be so.

So, the bottom line is, if you find a photo in the Internet, you can't use it in Wikipedia, UNLESS you have permission from the author of the photo to use it in Wikipedia under GFDL or Creative Commons (attribution, ShareAlike) licenses, or the image is in public domain due to expiration of copyright.

In future, please do not upload images copied from a website. For any confusion, you can send a message to me. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 09:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But to be honest I don't know how to send a message.-Faizul Latif Chowdhury

Fair use rationale for Image:Seely-Retirement-2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Seely-Retirement-2006.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles

When someone or something is known by two different names, as is the case with Joseph A. Winter and Joe Winter, we do not create duplicate articles. Instead, we use a redirect. That way, when someone wants to add some content to an article, they do not have to do so in two different places. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But how can I be sure that Joseph A. Winter is Joe Winter? I have not found any evidence from any source to that. I went to Mr. Winter's house in Calcutta but found that he had left a few weeks ago. Three of his books that I have in my possession does not indicate that Joe Winter is an informal contraction. Grateful if your kindly explain how to use redirect. Thank you.- Faizul Latif Chowdhury

I do not understand your first question. In your own version of the Joseph A. Winter article, you used the name "Joe Winter". Not to mention essentially identical text in both articles. So you clearly think that Joe Winter and Joseph A. Winter are the same person - otherwise, why write two essentially identical articles?

Please also note that any discussions you might personally have with someone fall into the category of original research, which is not acceptable at Wikipedia. (You can certainly inform yourself any way you want, but don't use your own personal experience or information you personally obtained, in Wikipedia articles.)

As far as informing you on how to use redirects, please click on that link or this one: Help:Redirect. If something on one of those pages is unclear, I suggest asking a question at the help desk; that way, someone there can not only answer your question but also modify a reference page if necessary. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems, unfortunately there is a basic misunderstanding of the issue. I never wrote an artile on Joseph A. Winter because I don't know him at all. I wrote an article on Joe Winter. And did not use re-direction. And I also did not include in that article my personal knowledge. Thanks. - Faizul Latif Chowdhury

There is indeed some misunderstanding. According to Wikipedia's software, your useraccount made this edit, creating the Joseph A. Winter article at 22:26, 8 January 2008, with the edit summary "This is a new artcile". Then, 14 minutes later, the same useraccount made this edit, creating the Joe Winter article, with the edit summary "This is a new article on British poet and translator Joe Winter". The contents of the two edits are virtually the same (perhaps exactly - I've not checked).

Regarding I also did not include in that article my personal knowledge, I'm glad to hear that. As I noted, doing so would have been a problem.-- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sibnarayan Ray 2006.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sibnarayan Ray 2006.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sexy Sea Shark 17:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sibnarayan Ray 2006.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sibnarayan Ray 2006.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: There is at all no copyright problem. I myself took the photograph and using it for the first time. Uploading options do not give any slot to write (PD-self). That created the confusion. - Faizul Latif Chowdhury

If the license you want to put on the image isn't in the dropdown box, you can just put the license tag in the Summary box and ignore the dropdown box. So just put {{PD-self}} in the summary box. I hope this helps. Thanks for your contributions. MECU≈talk 13:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cover Meyebela.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover Meyebela.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Clinton_Seely.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Clinton_Seely.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 13:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hossain Zillur Rahman.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Faizul Latif Chowdhury!
We thank you for uploading Image:Hossain Zillur Rahman.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cover-first-book.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover-first-book.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This for sure a free image. It is a book cover without copyright. Even the name of the designer has not been mentioned. -FLC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.242.254.76 (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio

Hello, I inform you that I requested move for the article at J. M. G. Le Clézio to go back to the original title, Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio. Since you has shown interest in the article, I would appreciate your input in the discussion. The discussion for move has very a few participants so far, so more people's opinion on this matter would be really necessary. Regards.--Caspian blue 14:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sibnarayan Ray 1 2006.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sibnarayan Ray 1 2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rollback on Taslima Nasrin

I have used rollback to revert the changes you made to the article. Some of the material you added is useful, but all of it is entirely unrefenced, much is not encyclopedic in tone, and, worse, your first edit, in which you changed "Nasrin" to "Taslima" throughout the entire article makes it impossible for me to simply undo that change without resorting to a wholesale reversal. The last name is what we use in encyclopedic articles, even if many of the publications cited from Bangladesh and India use her first name. Her books are listed alphabetically by last name, and that is how she should be referred to here. I will go through the other edits you made and take whatever is encyclopedic, but I will have to add "fact tags" since you never provide any references. Remarks on "rickety style" or whatever it was will have to be removed, unless you can provide reliable sources that make that claim. I appreciate your interest in improving the article, but I have spent an enormous amount of time on it already, and the way in which you added informartion and the order in which you did that would require me to spend an hour or more going through, and that's not right. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- I can wait until you have finished. 'Taslima' would be more in line with the custom, rather than 'Nasreen'. No one in India or Bangladesh calls her Nasreen, rest assured. I'll add references after the texts have been placed in order. You can trust I have more first hand knowledge than anyone. I have read and reviewed all her books. I interviewed her in 2006 in Calcuta. But if you'll insist I can certainly wait to add facts with sources. I see that you are relying on info that bare exclusively available on the internet. No offense please. 'Rickety' is from a book review by Professor Dyson of Oxford. Faizul Latif Chowdhury (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - You've said that before that I rely on information from the internet--surely you also notice that almost everything I have done to the article is scrupulously referenced from reliable sources. What people in Bangladesh call her doesn't really matter here. If such terms are from book reviews, why not cite those right away, the moment you add the information? I urge you to stick to the format as we have it right now, following the guidelines of the MOS. That replacement of the name, for instance, that's quite disruptive, and unverified information, especially since this concerns a living person, must be removed immediately, per WP:BLP. I appreciate your first-hand knowledge, but this encyclopedia has as its central tenet the matter of verifiability. Incidentally, you probably should be careful citing your own reviews. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - There is no point in arguing with you. I shall wait. I take your note of caution. FYI, I have not used a bit from my own reviews. Also be informed that I have added no info that is not verifiable. Your approach has greatly REDUCED informational value. I shall allow you to work because this is not a place to fight. During the last two years I have expanded the article with more and more data/info and kept it updated to the day. Do not ask for citation unnecessarily for something ignoring the same for other instances. Anyway, thank you for your interest in putting a good structure for the article. Good work man, carry on. Faizul Latif Chowdhury (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Thank you. Let me remind you though that encyclopedic information should be verifiable by having sources provided for each fact and statement. Information shouldn't just be theoretically verifiable. And I didn't mean to suggest that you couldn't use your own reviews, which I'd love to see, by the way. Drmies (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - I also see that in this edit you removed a lot of sourced information, and four references from reliable sources. Drmies (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - If you look carefully at the edit I referred to above, you'll see other problems. For instance, you added two nuggets of information, that she worked in "the family planning clinic of Mymenisingh Medical College hospital," and that she "was working in Mitford Hospital as an anaestheologist." Both of these are inserted into the original sentence, and thus claim that they find their source in the Britannica article, which is referenced, in both cases, immediately after your addition. But this information is of course not to be found in that article. The issue of its relevance aside, such information needs a source and must not be misattributed to another source. Drmies (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Although largely truncated now, in terms of of information provided, the article on Taslima is taking a better shape. Ref. two of your comments above. First, there was no intention to remove any well-sourced info which is acceptable. I stopped in the midst of working just to allow you space. I meant to resume after you would be finishing. The Britannica mishap is a matter of inadvertance, a consequence of messy text, interspersed with references. I am not an IT expert, I add info and leave the text to be properly fitted and placed by comptenet editors like you. Faizul Latif Chowdhury (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Faizul Latif Chowdhury! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Rafiqul Haque - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:Painting-Banalata-Sen.jpg

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.

File source problem with File:Rabindranath-by-Rothenstein.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rabindranath-by-Rothenstein.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cover Gavi Brittanto.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cover Gavi Brittanto.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 22:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover Gavi Brittanto.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cover Gavi Brittanto.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Joe Winter.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joe Winter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cover the Rakhaines.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Cover the Rakhaines.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 08:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Painting-Banalata-Sen.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Painting-Banalata-Sen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Manik Bandopadhay.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Manik Bandopadhay.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:15, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Daily Sun 24 Oct 2010.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Daily Sun 24 Oct 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Maulana Bhasani.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Maulana Bhasani.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Arr4 (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maulana Bhasani.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maulana Bhasani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jonmajati.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jonmajati.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamal Siddiqi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamal Siddiqi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamal Siddiqi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 07:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moniruzzaman.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moniruzzaman.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 08:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Faizul Latif Chowdhury. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of Naked Lonely Hand.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of Naked Lonely Hand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Faizul Latif Chowdhury. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shahabuddin Nagari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahabuddin Nagari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahabuddin Nagari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 00:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mustafa Majid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustafa Majid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Majid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bangla Desh – A Voice of a New Nation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangla Desh – A Voice of a New Nation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangla Desh – A Voice of a New Nation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 01:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contributing to AfD discussions

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, as you did with Bangla Desh – A Voice of a New Nation. If the template is removed, it will automatically be restored by a bot, so removing it accomplishes nothing but disruption of the consensus seeking process. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the deletion discussion instead. You may find the page Help:My article got nominated for deletion! useful. Thank you. -- Worldbruce (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no article. I don't own any article. I contribute to Wikipedia as much as I can. There is no deletion discussion. Before attaching the template there should be discussion with acceptable justification. Then I can contest. Hope my argument makes sense. Faizul Latif Chowdhury (talk) 08:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]