User talk:Falcorian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Write a new message. I will reply on this page, under your post, and probably also make a copy onto your page of the whole discussion just to keep all replies together while still letting you know I have replied to your comment.

Meetup[edit]

  In the area? You're invited to the
   Minnesota meetup
Map of Minnesota counties blank.svg
  Date: 31 October 2010
  Time: noon
  Place: Midtown Exchange Global Market,
East Lake Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota
44°56′57″N 93°15′40″W / 44.9493°N 93.2612°W / 44.9493; -93.2612
  

You're invited to join WikiProject Women artists![edit]

Archives of American Art - Georgette Seabrook - 2381 CROPPED.jpg

Hello Falcorian! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite, but I don't think I'm active enough—nor my interests consistent enough—to be of much use! --Falcorian (talk) 16:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Don Quijote Project listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Don Quijote Project. Since you had some involvement with the Don Quijote Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LeVake v. Independent School District 656[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article LeVake v. Independent School District 656 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability; local case at the trial level with no precedential value; no appeal noted, not even to intermediate court of appeals, let alone the state supreme court.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 00:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of LeVake v. Independent School District 656 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LeVake v. Independent School District 656 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeVake v. Independent School District 656 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TJRC (talk) 23:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)