This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Favonian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


There is a determined effort amongst (I suspect) those with motives to politically filter out information throwing this American Spy Base in an unfavourable light including any details relating to the conduct of American citizens employed at the base. I will re edit this article to contain information relating to

  1. the current operational status of Croughton related to any secret agreement
  1. reveal any sensitive information while protecting my sources
  1. report the considered opinions of International Lawyers in relation to the diplomatic immunity status of Mr Anthony Sacoolas and his wife involved in the fatal head on collision with Harry Dunn
  1. will show the obstruction and lies that have been used to protect individuals working at this American base
  1. will describe the policies of a future Labour govt to investigate and eventually eliminate this type of American base on British territory
  1. I will assemble numerous references and citations that will make it extremely difficult for you to routinely reverse any edits that do not comply with the pro American right wing political bias within Wikipedia which has been well publicised in such reliable newspapers as The Guardian. DarlingDavid (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

DarlingDavid DarlingDavid (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

This discussion belongs at Talk:RAF Croughton, not here, and remember to log in to your account. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Just to note that the user continues to add unreferenced information to the RAF Croughton and does not engage in the talk page. Concerned about BLP issues with unreferenced material and the increasing rheotric from the user. Thanks MilborneOne (talk) 08:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
... and now, surprisingly, he's blocked indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 16:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC)