User talk:Flix11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Flix11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Yk3 talk · contrib 09:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Crystal Clear action edit add.png
2011 AFC Champions League Final, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
  • The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Baseball Watcher 01:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi. When you add names to "day of the year" articles, or make any other edits to Wikipedia, could you please include an edit summary. Just the name would suffice. Thanks. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 11:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011[edit]

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Alexandros Tabakis. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Gurt Posh (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

How to create own kit for my favourite fotball team ?[edit]

How to create own kit (wikipedia) for my favourite football team ? For example, make it look like Lokomotiv Moscow. Detailed procedure for creating kit (using photoshop or gimp, upload photo) . Please contact me on my talk page. Regards, iQual (talk) 10:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Suharto, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Merbabu (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Sócrates, you may be blocked from editing. EchetusXe 11:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Sacha Baron Cohen, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Baron-Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Macedonian (talk) 03:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

TOTD[edit]

Tip of the day...


Please summarize your work using the Edit summary box

If you make anything other than a minor edit to an article, it helps others if you fill in the edit summary. Edit summaries are visible in the page history, watchlists, and on Recent changes, so they help other users keep track of what is happening to a page.

If you use section editing, the summary box is filled in with the section heading by default (in gray text), which you can follow with more detail. You also can put links to articles in the edit summary. Just put double brackets around [[the article title]] like you would normally. The summary is limited to 255 characters, so many people use common abbreviations, such as sp for correcting spelling mistakes, rm for remove, ce for copy-edit, etc.

Read more:


Consensus is to Help:Edit_summary#Always provide an edit summary.

It's a shame you've so far shunned ESs - is there some reason why you've done so? Trafford09 (talk) 12:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello![edit]

Hi Flix11, I wanted to say hello, I have seen your good work around Wikipedia, so good job! I've also noticed that you don't use edit summaries. Edit summaries are important because they let other users know why you made an edit, typing in something into the box (as shown below) can help if you remove text or make an edit that can be disputed.

Edit commands.PNG

Also, since Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and this encyclopedia gets built by working together, it would be helpful if you replied to comments here on your talk page or on the talk page of other editors (you can do that by simply editing the page). You can talk to me by editing my talk page. Thanks, Quasihuman | Talk 15:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Hi and thanks for gently warning User_talk:190.174.208.143 about his/her vandalism, and for helpfully reverting it. It's nice to see you collaborating and talking to other editors - bravo.

Please have another think, though, about using Edit Summaries - thanks, Trafford09 (talk) 10:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN[edit]

With regards to this edit please see WP:NOTBROKEN. -- PBS (talk) 23:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Can I again call your attention to this? While there are a few exceptions when a redirect should in fact be bypassed, it is generally neither required nor desired. This is a long-standing community consensus, please don't ignore it.
Amalthea 11:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
You are still making unhelpful edits (e.g. [1]). Please stop. DexDor (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Communist symbolism[edit]

Hello, Flix. Listen, you added a statement implying that Indonesia was a communist state at some point of her history, with a link to the article Pancasila. Pancasila was an original political doctrine created by the father of Indonesia, Sukarno, and it had nothing to do with communism neither marxism. Sukarno incorporated social justice (not communism) as one of the pillars of Pancasila, and he also spoke about the necessity of creating "a national socialism" that was specific for Indonesia, thus, he was never a communist and he never embraced any type of marxism (although he had some support from the Indonesian Communist Party until 1965). I recommend you not to add speculative information like that to the articles. 190.48.118.204 (talk) 12:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disregard of community consensus outlined at WP:R2D and refusal to engage in discussion about your edits. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Amalthea 20:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Flix11 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribscreation logchange block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

i don't read about the "fix to redirect" rule. It's absolutely my fault. I understand why did i blocked, because of my mistakes to fix to redirect. I swear it won't happened anymore. From now on, i'll edit only to fix red links, update information, and to complete on dates page (add some footballers to the "births" section according to their birthdays. About discussing, i'm sorry to not discuss first. But i'm completely busy on many schoolworks so i don't have much time to stay tuned in this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flix11 (talkcontribs) 10:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Per request and below understanding, block no longer necessary. Amalthea 11:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I understand that you are busy, but you are not alone in editing this encyclopedia. We all do it together, and for that to work, we must talk to each other.
Replying to comments or concerns really doesn't take that much time: Whenever the orange bar comes up which notifies you of a new message, read it and reply. If it's a concern about an edit of yours, avoid making similar edits until the concern is resolved. Even if it's just a notice, acknowledging it helps the other editor see that you read the notice.
Under the assumption that you will try that I will gladly unblock this account right away. Amalthea 11:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

List of Presidents of Indonesia[edit]

Hi, I just reverted your edits to this article because although Sukarno did establish a party called the PNI, it was dissolved before he became president, and he was not a member of the revived version(s). Regards Davidelit (Talk) 16:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Indonesian Premier Division[edit]

Merge-arrows.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Indonesian Premier Division, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Bandy boy (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ansan Wa~ Stadium may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • do]], [[South Korea]]. It's currently served as home stadium for [[Ansan Police FC]|Ansan Police]]. While under construction it was known as 'Ansan Stadium'. After the public subscription during

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Liverpool v Hearts[edit]

You have changed the year of this match in accordance with the source. However, when you do this please explain in your edit summary that you have changed it to agree with the source, rather than passing it off as a typo. Britmax (talk) 11:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

June 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Andreas Pereira, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Watford F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • nat=ENG | pos=FW | name=[[Uche Ikpeazu]]|other=at [[Blackpool F.C.|Blackpool]] until 30 June 2016}}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Indonesian winner of WWTBAM?[edit]

Show me a proof about this or video. --Marik-modder (talk) 20:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Flix11. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! ◦ Trey Maturin 18:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Unblock[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Flix11 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribscreation logchange block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. This network is a personal home network provided officially, not a proxy nor a public network

Decline reason:

You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can use WhatIsMyIP to find your IP address. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 12:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

WP:NOTBROKEN, again[edit]

Hello. Regarding your recent edit to Birmingham City F.C. I came to tell you about WP:NOTBROKEN, a community consensus that says we don't need to avoid redirects, other than in very specific circumstances. But I see you've already been told about it, more than once... Please don't keep on editing to avoid redirects: it really isn't helpful. Thank you for listening. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

You are still doing this, and you are still refusing to discuss it. You were blocked once before for this behaviour, and agreed to cease "fixing" redirects as part of the unblock conditions. If you wish to be blocked again, by all means continue, just be aware that any future unblock appeals where you promise to change your behaviour are likely to be rejected. Yunshui  12:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Flix11. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

South Korean national football team kit evolution[edit]

Hi, Thank you for your interest in South Korea National Football Team. I'm a South Korean and big fan of South Korean football. Current kit evolution based on photos and match videos at that time. I had Korean football magazine 1970s~1990s. I checked out various match photos and videos and news articles. Also I asked Korea Football Association national team jersey history in October. This point of time, Kit evolution is almost accurate. But I'll check out more, Especially, 1950s~1970s. If I find mistake or new kit, I'll update. Please believe me. If you have question about South Korea national football team Kit. Please feel free to ask me whatever questions you may happen to have!Footwiks (talk)

2017–18 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season (top scorers)[edit]

Own goals are negative data, top scorers is a positive data chart, so please don't add them in. Govvy (talk) 11:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

Can you please add your sources to Japan national football team in 2017? All articles need to have referneces. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Live updates[edit]

Hi, please bear in mind we should not update statistics until after a match is completed. Please refer to WP:LIVEUPDATES. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Just realised the match had already finished, sorry! Mattythewhite (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Infobox dates[edit]

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

There's no need to fake hours and minutes in timestamp. Just add day-month-year or use ~~~~~. SLBedit (talk) 00:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Can you please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 A.F.C. Bournemouth season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Oliver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Non-free image use[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of Vice-Presidents of India, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Taichung TRA station[edit]

The Taichung TRA station article most certainly does exist. Please revert your edit to the Taichung article. Phlar (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Phlar (talk) 05:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

John Lewis[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

3RR[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at John Lewis (civil rights leader) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

File:New GBK Main Stadium from Drone Jan 2018.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New GBK Main Stadium from Drone Jan 2018.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New GBK Main Stadium from Drone Jan 2018.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New GBK Main Stadium from Drone Jan 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2018 (UTC) File:New GBK Main Stadium from Drone Jan 2018.jpg

Disambiguation link notification for March 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2002 Liga Indonesia Premier Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergei Dubrovin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

italy shorts[edit]

italian national football team has white shorts. don't look at footyheadlines', todosobrecamisetas' pictures, look at the photos, please.--Luca•M 08:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

On that match (and also one against Sweden), they played as away team with the home team used dark shorts. As of 2nd leg vs Sweden, they just released the kit a few days earlier and probably did not have an alternate. But fine I will follow you for now. But when it became clear that THE OFFICIAL RELEASE combinations are the right one, I will change them back. Flix11 14:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

the shorts you have used in the page are wrong: the home shorts have blue navy details not light blue details, as you can see in the photos I linkled before. what about the shorts used by buffon against Macedonia? if the blue shorts were the right ones he would used them. footyheadlines isn't always right: look at the "new" milan logo, look at the as roma main sponsor...--Luca•M 14:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
the first ones are red so italy will have red shorts? it doesn't prove anything. untill it will be an official announcement from fifa, uefa, figc and so on we have just the fact that italy has not ever used the blue shorts but only white shorts. the under 19 female team has also a squad photo with white shorts, has played with white shorts.--Luca•M 15:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

ok. if you want (and if you have time and sources) i have a job for you: in the italian wiki there is a page about FC Monaco's colors and symbols, but there aren't a lot of kits and just only the modern ones are nice. could you draw them? if you want i can help you with some kits.--Luca•M 15:35, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karen conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Win Myint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kyle Walker. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Bolding/national ownership/blind reverts[edit]

Hello. As I noted in the edit summary, last time there was a discussion on bolding winners, there was a clear majority of editors against doing so (this applies to both parliamentary and presidential elections – see Azerbaijani presidential election, 2018, Armenian presidential election, 2013, Mongolian presidential election, 2017 etc). I don't generally edit American articles, but what happens there isn't an excuse to ignore the consensus that appears to have been arrived at at WP:E&R. You're welcome to start another discussion there if you disagree.

Regarding your comments about "your country", firstly I don't really edit British election articles either, and secondly Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia; anyone can edit an article on any country, and no one editor or group of editors own a country's articles. I almost exclusively edit articles on international elections (you're welcome to review my editing history), so I don't really appreciate this reference.

Lastly, your reverts of my edits appear to have been blind reverts – i.e. you simply hit undo without actually looking at the substance of the edits (and then had to redo part of them). This is really poor practice, so please avoid doing this in the future. Cheers, Number 57 13:53, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give US invasion of Grenada a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Mewaqua (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Template:2017–18 Eredivisie table[edit]

If on a Saterday you would notice a traffic sign saying "No Parking Mon-Fri", would you remove it too because it doesn't apply at that specific time? – Sb008 (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Hardly nonsense, the KNVB relegations dictate these season rules to apply at all time. Just cause the situation can't occur any more in this season, isn't a reason to delete them. Season rules is general information independent from whether they can occur at a specific time.--Sb008 (talk) 06:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Which edit are you talking about? "Season in progress"? The context is that there will be no changes to the table unless something extraordinary happened (point deduction/relegation because of match fixing, etc.). The playoff matches will not change neither the "play" (which max is 34) nor "W/D/L" and "GF-GA-GD". Therefore I concluded so. – Flix11 (talk) 07:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Indeed, the table will no longer change. But the rules will not change either. "Rules for classification" is general information, it indicates what applies at each stage/time. Just like the traffic sign indicates what applies at each time. Like you don't remove the traffic sign cause at a specific time it doesn't apply, you don't remove part of the claasification rules cause they don't apply at a specific time/stage. Those rules are general.
Furthermore, the info below "Discipline" on the 2017–18 Eredivisie page is incorrect. I understand you like an English source, but Soccerway is not a very reliable source. Especially for "assists" they are even more off. And if you want to use Soccerway,it's better to use www.soccerway instead of int.soccerway. The www URL has IP origin dectection and redirects to the pages in your language. So, assuming you from a country where English is spoken, you will be redirected to the int URL anyway. However people from countries with different languages will be redirected to the pages of their language. If someone is from a country with a language for which no pages exists, they will be redirected to the int URL as well, which is the default (Similar like Google does).--Sb008 (talk) 08:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I see. Is this really about the "Season in progress"?. Because the Template:2016–17 Eredivisie table and Template:2015–16 Eredivisie table also do not have the "Season in progress". I did not erase the "Rules for classification". The cards stats are done. Thanks for the notice. About the assists I already cross-checked it with the Eredivisie website listed as source so it should be correct. I see that the difference between int. and local version is just the language. How can it define which is right and which is wrong? Just checked those (my local version is id.soccerway) and there is no difference. – Flix11 (talk) 08:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

────────── The most reliable source for stats is [2]. My mistake about the "Rules for classification", I looked wrong, I thought you removed all from "Season in progress" to just before "End of Season". But you only removed the string "Season in progress". However that string should be there, it's to indicate the rules slightly differ while the season is in progress and at the end of the season. You must be located in Indonesia since you get id.soccerway. The actual information is of course the same for each language. The interface (like menu's) however are changed in the language for the country. Maybe your English is good, but for someone who doesn't speak English that well, an interface in their language makes it easier.--Sb008 (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Read Template talk:2017–18 Eredivisie table--Sb008 (talk) 10:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
First, I do not understand what you wrote because it is very long. Second, it has never implemented before, neither in other league tables nor in Eredivisie. The cup winners do not need an X thing because their win is not related to the league and its table, only related to European qualification. It is enough with footnotes like [a] or [b] next to "qualification to ...". I do not understand that you say C-R-O-Q or not at all but you make X there. We no longer need "The winner of the 2017–18 KNVB Cup will qualify for the Europa League third qualifying round , if these winners qualify for the 2018–19 UEFA Champions League that spot will go to the third placed team." because now we know the KNVB Cup winners did not qualify for the UCL. And with that, AZ qualified for the 2nd QR. If you want to explain the qualification in case so, just hope next season will go your way. – Flix11 (talk) 15:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
First, being Cup Winner, like Champion is a status. A status which gives a team the right to play EL 3Q round (in this season). For the Champions the starus C is available. For the Cup Winners no letter is available so it has to be defined using X. The Cup may not be earned based on the league ranking, but by a separate tournament, however the Cup and the league are very much related. Because who ever wins the Cup affects the status giving to other rankings in the league. The footnote explains the rules for CL3Q. The rules have not changed because Feyenoord won the cup. The rules are still the same, only a specific part will not come into effect because Feyenoord did not qualify for the CL. Feyenoord winning the Cup changes the status of Feyenoord and not the rules. The rules remain the same. Second, it never been done before is no argument. For centuries mankind thought the earth was flat. Then wiser people discovered the earth was round and not flat. There're millions of other examples like that. If we always would stick to an idea/concept because it's always be thought/done like that, we would still be in the stone age. That doesn't mean the new idea/concept is correct by definition. But I offer reasoned arguments why it is. You offer nothing, you don't understand and it was never implemented before. You don't have a single argument why what you say is correct. In that perspective it's pretty arrogant to say "hope next season will go your way". It's not about "who's way it goes" but about what is correct and what isn't. Whole season you did nothing to update the page. End of season all of a sudden you think you can change things as you like without offering any valid reason. There is a discussion page where you can motivate your opinion. If opinions differ, it can be discussed to reach a consensus. But giving no motivation, and just changing, isn't very constructive. So if you want it your way, present your case, as I did, and it can be discussed. Similar, stop changing the format of the top scorers and assists table until you present valid reasons why it should be different.--Sb008 (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Past tense, present tense[edit]

Hi, I would like to talk about your most recent edit in Template:2017–18 Premier League table. I use past tense there because League Cup concluded. FA Cup is yet to finish, but its result was clear enough to make sure that its berth would be passed to the league. It is not related to the fact that Premiership is still going. I think past tense is correct there :) Centaur271188 (talk) 06:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Well okay then. No problem. It is not really matter. Thanks for your help on the Eredivisie table. – Flix11 (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Coupe de France - refimprove[edit]

Hi,

You added a refimprove template to 2017–18 Coupe de France. Could you give me a steer as to where you think additional citations are needed? Each match is cited in a report and there are 33 general citations used/reused in the article. Cheers Gricehead (talk) 07:57, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

There are definitely 195 matches. Thus:
Round Teams Matches Cumulative
7th 176 88 88
8th 88 44 132
9th 64 32 164
R32 32 16 180
R16 16 8 188
QF 8 4 192
SF 4 2 194
Final 2 1 195
Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay I miscalculated LOL. Will you update that on 2016–17 Coupe de France and maybe the seasons prior? Thanks a lot. – Flix11 (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 Done for 2016–17 Coupe de France (note: 194 matches due to a bye in the 7th round) and 2015–16 Coupe de France. Earlier than that needs more research as some of the information is missing from the articles. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 14:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your service. Cheers, Flix11 (talk) 14:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

2018-19 Premier League[edit]

Hi there, I'm TB Chigz. I'm here to talk about the edit you found disruptive on the 2018-19 Premier League page. Cause the only disruptive edit I made was immediately reverted when I found out the truth about it. Otherwise, all of my edits have been constructive since then. Point it out for me then we'll start from there. Thank you.

TB Chigz (talk) 10:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, that one. I am sorry, I think I made a mistake there. I will erase my comment from your talk page. – Flix11 (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christmas Eve 2000 Indonesia bombings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mataram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

infobox wp:overlink[edit]

Hi, I have just seen your edits in Serie A infobox. I would like to improve it by removing redundant links, many links refer to the same team seems unnecessary. Please support this change :) Centaur271188 (talk) 08:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Premier League Playmaker of the Season[edit]

Thanks for creating this article. But I need to point out that you added the featured list icon to the article, which I presume you did by mistake. Please be careful not to do this. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2018 UEFA Europa League Final logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2018 UEFA Europa League Final logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Manchester City F.C., did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not be disruptive on editing team kits. Govvy (talk) 15:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Football - continuing debate[edit]

Hi, I have just seen it while randomly checking WikiProject Football: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Need assistance with Template: 2017–18 Eredivisie table (continued). It is weird that Sb008 pinged me twice in that page and I received none notifications. Have you got any alerts from him (he also summoned you twice)? Right now, his argument is "since there is no consensus (I think he wants me to show him a formal and written one) on editing tables, then I can edit them in anyway as I see fit". I think I will talk to him about WP:DONTFIXIT. I would also appreciate if you can join this discussion again. Thanks :) Centaur271188 (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Centaur271188: No, I do not. But this might explain why you received that. – Flix11 (talk) 18:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Sorry if my expression confused you, I would like to clarify that I received nothing. :) Centaur271188 (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Well might be a glitch. But yes I will rejoin the discussion. Thanks for reminding me :D – Flix11 (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Kit articles[edit]

Thanks for your advice! I have a question. Blow manufacturer history table based on spanish article. But Original English aritle had another information

Can you check out them?

  • English article

Adidas (from 1982 until 1984), Le Coq Sportif (from 1984 until 1992) and Adidas once again (since 1992).

  • Spanish article
Manufacturer Period Notes
None 1920–1935
Deportes Cóndor 1935–1966
Umbro 1966
Deportes Cóndor 1967–1981
Adidas 1981–1983
Le Coq Sportif 1983–1991
Adidas 1991–present

Footwiks (talk)

It is 1991 all the way. – Flix11 (talk) 09:16, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Kit history is better article title[edit]

After searching in google, I can't find term Kits History. Most article used term Kit History. Please don't move. Footwiks (talk)

@Footwiks: wikt:kitsFlix11 (talk) 06:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Firstly, Please stay article title, English native speakers will judge. Footwiks (talk)
@Footwiks: [www.historicalkits.co.uk Historical Football Kits], [www.kitclassics.co.uk] (CLASSIC KITS). Both made by British. As far as I know, they would not even let your pages exist (case of Bradford City FC KITS history). "Most article used term Kit History", you said. Where? Tell me @Footwiks:Flix11 (talk) 07:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Italian flag[edit]

Hi, I saw your edit on 2006 FIFA World Cup article, and I have a question. I know that in 2002 the Italian government firstly announced the exact colors of the Italian flag, but are we sure that "your" flag is the correct one? I saw this file, which indicates the exact "Pantone" colors that you listed in the edit summary, but the flag is quite different. -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nick.mon: Hi. It has been a while since the flag was accepted as it is. If you want to talk about it, feel free to discuss that first in the Flag of Italy talk page. Thanks for the notice. – Flix11 (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, excuse me if I asked this to you, but I'm not a great expert in flags and I noticed this fact some months ago, so I hoped that you could tell me more about that. Anyway thanks for your help :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
@Nick.mon: And neither am I :) What if you bring this to someone with more knowledge on flags, for instance User:Illegitimate Barrister to help. – Flix11 (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Celso Borges[edit]

You added caps for Borges, but subtracted 3 international goals, without providing a source. Also, you called it an update, which it can hardly be, as he can't score "negative goals", or something of the like.Quanstizium (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

I just update it according to Soccerway profile. Now has fixed. Thanks for the notice. – Flix11 (talk) 20:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Dmitri Cheryshev[edit]

Hi there from Portugal,

in the infobox, please, only city and country. Region of birth appears in storyline. Thanks, happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 00:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Andrés Guardado[edit]

The same user here,

please do not revert me anymore in this player regarding his international caps. If you see his NFT.com page, you will see he has THREE UNOFFICIAL matches, not recognised by FIFA.

Thanks --Quite A Character (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Quite A Character: The caps are included even if not recognized by FIFA, for example in Romelu Lukaku and Kevin De Bruyne. This source ([3]) is the official FIFA stats of all players in the 2018 FWC. The caps and goals are updated usually at 21:30 UTC. – Flix11 (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Seems it's TWO unofficial caps and not three (per the RSSSF source i just added to the chart) and not THREE. Please i don't think we add them, but i will ask at WP:FOOTY just to be sure. --Quite A Character (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

@Quite A Character: If not, include them all and give notes like in those Belgians pages. I suggest to check out the FIFAdata PDF first. The update timestamp is on the page footer. – Flix11 (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

SOCCERWAY is not more important than NFT or RSSSF. The match against Panama was even interrupted (!), and Guadeloupe is not recognised by FIFA. I have reinstated the 147, if we engage in an edit war it will only be bad for both of us.

P.S. Don't remove again the NFT source i added for his int'l goals, like you did in your last edit. Thank you. --Quite A Character (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

See? There are already several opinions that agree to remove the unofficial caps here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Andr%C3%A9s_Guardado). Please participate, if you want. --Quite A Character (talk) 20:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Found this (please see here http://www.mediotiempo.com/futbol/2017/09/01/en-2007-un-mexico-vs-panama-se-suspendio-por-lluvia), in the fifth paragraph one can read "A pesar de disputarse un tiempo completo, este encuentro no es considerado como de “Selección A” por la FIFA, por lo que no se encuentra registro estadístico en su página oficial.", which means "In spite of one full half being played this is not considered an A-teams one by FIFA, and thus is not statistically recorded in its official page"; however, after talking with User:Mattythewhite, he made a good point and i reinserted the match against Guadeloupe. But there is no sense in inserting this one against Panama.

Regards --Quite A Character (talk) 21:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Updating infoboxes[edit]

Please use five tidles (~~~~~) for where the date and timestamp should go when updating player infoboxes, thank you. Govvy (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Updates[edit]

Hey, thanks for all the updates of the player articles. But can't you just do one whole edit instead of two? Got me some edit conflicts already. Kante4 (talk) 16:04, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

@Kante4: Well it will take longer amount of time for me though. How about we split so you got one team and I got the other? – Flix11 (talk) 08:52, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Just do the whole edit. Not sure what is so hard about it? I do it aswell and it's easy and quicker than loading the article, edit the box, loading the article, edit the International section and then load the page again... Kante4 (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Flix, you're still aren't doing a correct time/date stamp. Be helpful if you could thanks. Govvy (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Update[edit]

you must see other user before i am wrote. lihat dulu ya sebelum saya tulis. tahniah emosimu ya. jangan anggap saya salah. lihat dulu usernya sebelum saya tulis. Akuindo (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

@Akuindo: Cuba awak tengok [4] line 542. – Flix11 14:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Stones, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

@Mattythewhite: Stop the revert. I will type the source. – Flix11 (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Maybe mind the attitude, and learn some basic grammar while you're at it. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Ambox warning pn.svg Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on The End of the World (Skeeter Davis song). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 75.182.115.183 (talk) 13:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

@75.182.115.183: Make an account first. Then we'll talk. Actually I want to cite, but since the movie is uploaded illegally, thus violating WP:VIDEOLINK, I can not cite it. It is in here. Go to 46:28 to hear the song. Please understand. – Flix11 (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
You need to get control of your attitude if you want to continue editing here. Wikipedia does not require registration to edit, and that includes issuing legitimate warnings. I suggest reading WP:CIVIL. This is not your personal website to do with as you please. Wikipedia has rules and guidelines, and you don't have any special privilege that allows you to ignore them. Collaborative editing is required. You have numerous warnings on this talk page. If you continue to ignore them you are headed for a another block. Second and third blocks usually are for a long period of time. And it doesn't matter what you or I hear at 46:28. You need a source. Again, read WP:V and WP:RS. The warning stands. 173.209.178.244 (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Tottenham first team kit[edit]

The blue/black doesn't go half way up on the shirt, it's only on the bottom part of the shirt. It needs fixing, please review the photo's at the Tottenham website. Govvy (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

@Govvy: I left the away kit in generic because the templates currently available (made by JonasBR, see on Spurs' Portuguese Wiki page) are wrong. The sleeves have 2 different colours, the one I listed in the generic is the greyish blue below the shoulders. Since the remake will cost me many times I currently do not have, I left it generic for now and I concentrated to both "easier-to-make" kits and my real life (with thesis looms). As for the home, I did not make those (Jonas did), but if I find you are correct, I will make one more suitable for you. If you can make those away kit, can you make one? I will correct the colors if you get it wrong. – Flix11 (talk) 15:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
@Govvy: Done. Is that good enough? – Flix11 (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
I don't know, still looks like more than needed on the top shirt, I am not good with colours, doesn't help that I have partial colour-blindness! Govvy (talk) 15:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Oh sorry to hear that. Well I have lowered the accent a little bit and tested it with white shorts, and I thought it was good. Thank you for bringing this up! – Flix11 (talk) 16:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anders Lindegaard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nick Pope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at August 5. Toddst1 (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2018 FIFA World Cup Final, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SounderBruce 19:56, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Spurs 3rd Kit.[edit]

Here, 1, Govvy (talk) 15:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

@Govvy: Yes I know. I can not make the templates because there are too much details. I will wait for JonasBR. – Flix11 (talk) 15:43, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2018 Asian Games closing ceremony, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.Angga1061 (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liang Xiaojing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Please use {{In use}}[edit]

If you want to avoid edit conflict, please use {{in use}} on the article so that I will not edit at the same time, thanks Hhkohh (talk) 13:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Common name[edit]

Hey there! The common names are not usually those mentioned by news channel (they usually also write the whole lot of it), it is better if we use the name mentioned in the websites which contain football data like globalsportsarchive etc. These sites contain all the data of the player including birth dates and their FIFA name.--Anbans 585 (talk) 10:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Here is the link for the Indonesian team.--Anbans 585 (talk) 10:44, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey there! I think that we should not sort the countries by their code as people don't usually know the FIFA codes of different countries, but they usually know the name. Do it like 2018 FIFA World Cup, as you may notice in the goalscorer section, Saudi Arabia's goalscorers are displayed after Russia, although Saudi's code is KSA and not something starting with 'S'. Similarly, Mexican names are displayed before Moroccan, although alphabetically Morocco's 'MAR' should come before Mexico's 'MEX'.--Anbans 585 (talk) 15:43, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Shamsunnahar Jr. moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Shamsunnahar Jr., does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Leighton Baines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited California Fried Chicken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&W (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

2018 Asian Para Games[edit]

Hi, are you interested in editing the article? Need few people to help me out.--Hongqilim (talk) 01:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

@Hongqilim: With pleasure. Thank you for the invitation. – Flix11 (talk) 15:57, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome.--Hongqilim (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

2018 Asian Para Games Opening[edit]

Hi, are you watching the opening ceremony? It is happening now. The live streaming is here--Hongqilim (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sumitro Djojohadikusumo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Success (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Football managers who never became players has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Football managers who never became players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chicken Dance, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also see WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly on 2018–19 Burnley F.C. season

Special:Diff/865088518 - a lot of Burnley fans would have found it better when the team drew 1 each in their match yesterday than the 5-0 battering which actually happened. Iggy (Swan) 17:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)