User talk:FoCuSandLeArN

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This is my talk page.
If you wish to ask why an article you submitted was declined, see some general advice here: User talk:FoCuSandLeArN/AFC declines
If this advice does not answer your questions, then for the fastest response try:
* AFC Help Desk
* unofficial live chat
Or please click here to leave me a message.
I always respond on my talkpage unless instructed to do so elsewhere.

Please comment on Talk:Political positions of Jeb Bush[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political positions of Jeb Bush. Legobot (talk) 00:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Request on 07:42:02, 27 July 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Tsdcorp[edit]


Hi I want to verify my article please suggest me the guideline Tsdcorp (talk) 07:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello there. You have substantial feedback that has been left on that page for you to read. Mainly, you haven't provided evidence that the digital platform is notable. For this we need to see that it has garnered significant coverage in independent and reliable sources. If this isn't possible, then the subject is simply not suitable for Wikipedia. Thank you, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Dewing Woodward Draft Article[edit]

Hello, I added more citations to the Dewing Woodward draft page. Ralph Rees and Mary Sieminski are the only leading researchers on Woodward which is why they're cited so often. Should I include a note about that in the article itself? Thank you!

I see. Let's see if anyone from WikiProject Visual Arts cares to comment about this. Best, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

20:31:03, 27 July 2015 review of submission by Leesfer[edit]


Trying to figure out what else I need for this article to be "notable."

The article about notability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music)) has "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" and "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)."

The subject of the article has both of these covered, but the article is still declined?

Leesfer (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

You need to read that over carefully: multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent. You have provided no such sources. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)