User talk:FoxyGrampa75

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ITN recognition for Jacqueline Pearce[edit]

Gnome globe current event.svgOn 5 September 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jacqueline Pearce, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 17:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Arthur Mitchell (dancer)[edit]

Gnome globe current event.svgOn 21 September 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Arthur Mitchell (dancer), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orders of magnitude (voltage)[edit]

I am requesting that you reopen the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orders of magnitude (voltage) and allow someone else to adjudicate it. Comment in this discussion were unanimous in favor of Keep. Dismissing those comments as mere opinion is not how the consensus process works. Per Wikipedia:Deletion process, re non-admin closures “Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to admins.” This one isn't even a close call. I would rather resolve this here, but I will take it to DRV if necessary.--agr (talk) 00:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

I think it's necessary to send the AFD to DRV given the situation. Also, I'd like all the AFD'd "Orders of magnitude" articles draftified until they are sufficiently reliably sourced. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 02:25, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review for Orders of magnitude (voltage)[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Orders of magnitude (voltage). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. agr (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, FoxyGrampa75. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Jurist[edit]

"Jurist" implies legal academic scholarship. Absent indications of this, it is best to avoid using this to describe a person. For members of the judiciary, the more easily recognizable term for readers would be "judge". bd2412 T 02:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Apologies for the error. I'll try to fix this if I have time. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 02:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
No worries. The drafts are still just drafts. Christmas Cheers! bd2412 T 03:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Page Mana Ayukawa should not be deleted - explanation[edit]

Related to Wikipedia source Most wanted articles, I found in that list Mana Ayukawa what was mentioned 89 times in various sources, thus I decided to start writing her biography, spending 2 hours for research, because are not so many sources on the internet about her, but she is considered and she is really a famous tennis player, about whom I consider should be written in Wikipedia. For me doesn't matter will be this article deleted or not, I only want to contribute to Wikipedia and make all possible for this. Hope I explain the reason why we should improve this page and do not delete. All the best! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trymemore (talkcontribs) 06:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)