User talk:Fragglerock1001

June 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at George Michael shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 15:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at George Michael. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Fragglerock1001 reported by User:331dot (Result: ). Thank you. 331dot (talk) 20:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can confirm that user 331dot has taken it upon themselves to add the title CBE to the name George Michael on page George Michael. False information for which no reference can be found. Please review information it is INCORECT. User 331dot unwilling to listen. Fragglerock1001 (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history of the page clearly shows your claims to be false. I had never edited the page before today, when I saw your edit warring on the Recent Changes page. Please contribute to the existing discussion about this issue on the article talk page. 331dot (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By the way you may want to post your complaint about me in the correct forum, which is not the 3RR talk page. 331dot (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]