You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The user Helmoony is mass-removing "Tunisian arabic" in articles that was in place since several months. after the debate in Tunisia portal in september, an admin finally decided to grant the mention of Tunisian arabic for the names of people and places. Things were so settled since then, but the user Helmoony is recently removing all the mentions, could you please do something about it ? Thank you.Zangouang (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think I'm qualified to judge the merits of this particular matter; I read the discussion at WP:ANI and it seems there is a long history to this. Perhaps those more closely involved can offer counsel. 12:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hogs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Sorry, a lot of the edits seemed to be unnecessary grammar and word choice changes (most cases, for the worse) and adding too many unnecessary details to the lead. I do agree that the reference improvements and perhaps some of the changes to the body were salvageable. I'll try to restore them when I get a chance. If you have time, and would like to at least restore the reference improvements, I would appreciate it. Abog (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)