User talk:FriscoRGMC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome![edit]

Hello, FriscoRGMC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Frisco Coakley, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Valenciano (talk) 12:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Frisco Coakley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a specific animal, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Valenciano (talk) 12:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The World's Best Rabbit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 12:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yunshui  12:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The World's Best Rabbit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a specific animal, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ∫eb²+1(talk) 19:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Frisco Coakley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a specific animal, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ritchie333 (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Yunshui. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ritchie333 (talk) 19:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll be a bit more charitable, assume good faith and imagine you're about 12 years old, as this is the sort of thing my friend's daughter would write about. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not a memorial and the pages you have created simply do not belong on an encyclopedia. Please do not create any more, they will also be speedy deleted and can lead to your account being blocked. Also, although Wikipedia is used in schools to one extent or another, on the editing side we will assume you're an adult and treat you accordingly. --Ritchie333 (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:disruptive editing - repeatedly posting inappropriate articles, despite warning. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry your pet rabbit has died, but Wikipedia is not a place like Myspace or Facebook for people to write about themselves and their own affairs. It is a quite different sort of site - a serious project to build an encyclopedia. That means it is choosy about subjects for articles; everyone is welcome to contribute, but that does not mean they can write about whatever they like - see Wikipedia is not about YOU.
An indefinite block need not be permanent, you can place an unblock request below here, and another administrator will consider it; but you will need to convince them that you have understood what I wrote here, and explain what sort of editing you would do if you were unblocked.
Before placing an unblock request, I suggest you read:
JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]