- 1 Welcome
- 2 Disagree with move from Wycliffe Bible Translators to Wycliffe USA
- 3 Sorry, I disagree with you...
- 4 Why Wycliffe USA then?
- 5 Your submission at Articles for creation
- 6 Disambiguation link notification for May 4
- 7 Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fsbof/Leader Garden
- 8 MfD nomination of User:Fsbof/Leader Garden
Disagree with move from Wycliffe Bible Translators to Wycliffe USA
Disclosure: I work for Wycliffe UK. I disagree with the move from Wycliffe Bible Translators to Wycliffe USA. Wycliffe USA is only one of a number of Wycliffe Organisations. Wycliffe Global Alliance is the umbrella organisation, so I think it would be more logical to redirect Wycliffe Bible Translators to that page.
Also, there is general stuff on the Wycliffe USA page that isn't specific to that particular organisation, so better fits on the Global Alliance page, but it may be that you have plans to tidy that up, but haven't got round to it. Paulmorriss (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I disagree with you...
Paul, since each Wycliffe organization is a separate organization with different history, leaders, membership requirements, expectations, unique finances, etc, doesn't it make sense that there would be a separate Wikipedia page for each one? The point I was trying to make in the change was that there is no one "Wycliffe Bible Translator" but rather there is Wycliffe Bible Translators USA, and Wycliffe Bible Translators UK, and Wycliffe Bible Translators Australia, and Wycliffe Bible Translators Japan and so on and so forth down the list. Please add the appropriate information for Wycliffe UK on a Wycliffe UK page. There is also Wycliffe Global Alliance, and I did make a separate unique page for them already. Feel free to edit the Wycliffe USA info, the Wycliffe Global Alliance info, and to help in adding pages for any of the other Wycliffe organizations. Fsbof (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2013
Why Wycliffe USA then?
Your submission at Articles for creation
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fsbof/Leader Garden
A tag has been placed on User:Fsbof/Leader Garden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Fsbof/Leader Garden
User:Fsbof/Leader Garden, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fsbof/Leader Garden and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Fsbof/Leader Garden during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)